ъรεս
@crewislife.bsky.social
86 followers 120 following 40K posts
Black Lives Matter! Desert Shield/Storm Vet, Veterans Against Trump, FDR Democrat, #Atheist, 🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦 #Resist
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Find on Apple Podcasts under Gen X 80s Top 20 Countdown or add this link feeds.buzzsprout.com/2425891.rss to your podcast app!
'You used to be conservative': Fox News icon gets brutal fact check for Trump king comment
Fox News political analyst Brit Hume was hit with outrage on Saturday after appearing to reject the premise of the "No Kings" protests this weekend. Hume took to social media to defend the president. He wrote, "The 'No Kings' rallies are mostly a protest against a man who sought power 3 times through democratic elections and enacted his major agenda item by majority vote of democratically elected members of Congress." "Some king," he then added. But he was quickly corrected. Ex-GOP lawmaker Adam Kinzinger replied directly to Hume, writing, "Come on. You know what this means." "Of course he’s not a literal king because we won’t let him be. But our nation was founded on anti-corruption, disseminating power to the people, holding all equal under the law," he wrote Saturday. "Trump tried to overthrow a free election, pardoned 1000 criminals, and has placed congress on their knees. Oh not to mention the Epstein files, and his 400 million dollar free jet that we will pay 1 billion to upgrade and give to him. Gold palaces and ballrooms and massive arches are not the works of someone who seeks humble power." Political scientist Norman Ornstein had a list of his own: "Executive actions, illegal acts, including 'pocket' rescissions, firing people and eliminating agencies, bragging about killing fisherman in violation of international law. Weaponized DOJ and FBI in an open campaign of retribution," he wrote. "Masked thugs without identification assaulting children and American citizens, throwing them into detention without their constitutional rights being respected. Federal judges nominated by every modern president trying to block imperial actions. Brit, you used to be a conservative." He continued: "Let’s talk about selling pardons, violating emoluments clauses by enriching himself and his family through his office, including a $400 million jet bribe from Qatar, and Trump resorts in various countries, not done out of largesse but knowing they can extract something in return." Ornstein concluded, "If you don’t see something troubling in all of this, Brit, you have replaced your integrity with fealty to the cult. Which is very, very sad."Executive actions, illegal acts, including “pocket” rescissions, firing people and eliminating agencies, bragging about killing fisherman in violation of international law. Weaponized DOJ and FBI in an open campaign of retribution. 1 https://t.co/k5cFzdX3Ib — Norman Ornstein (@NormOrnstein) October 18, 2025
dlvr.it
'Bright red flag': Yale professor highlights 'blaring alarm bell' on new military strike
Donald Trump's administration just stepped in it with its latest military strike, according to a Yale professor. Margaret M. Donovan, Visiting Clinical Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School, appeared on MSNBC on Saturday to discuss Trump's latest attack on a foreign boat, purportedly carrying fentanyl. Donovan noted that the Trump admin returned the two survivors of the strike to their home countries, which she said was likely to avoid going before a judge on the topic of war powers. "The Trump administration stumbled into the last place they want to be," she said, "which is before an Article III judge." By sending "these people back to their apparent countries," Donovan added, the Trump admin was implying they aren't Venezuelan and they are "apparently not that dangerous." The host cut in to say it was "an admission that either they haven't thought it through... or these people aren't who they claimed them to be." Donovan agreed, saying it's possible that the federal government has been "killing not who they've been telling us." She went on to note a "blaring alarm bell" and "a bright red flag" as a top military official reportedly resigned amid tension over the military strikes. "That is very unusual," the professor added. "That's a sign. That's a clue." Of the Trump admin's actions today, Donovan said, "None of that holds up." "Their actions today undermined all of their legal justifications," she said this weekend.
dlvr.it
Protester claims discrimination by Trump: 'He wouldn't allow us to live in his properties'
A Los Angeles "No Kings" protester told MSNBC on Saturday that she and her parents were discriminated against by Donald Trump's family when they tried to rent property in New York years ago. Trump was accused of bias in renting to Black people in connection with the rentals from his father, Fred Trump, in the 1960s, according to the New York Times. That old story got new life over the weekend, when a MSNBC reporter attended a "No Kings" protest in L.A. The subject was only identified as Jamie from Rancho Cucamonga, and, when asked why she was there, she said, "Because my daughter's future depends on me coming out here like my mother walked for Martin Luther King. She marched, she walked. And I'm here in honor of her. And in honor of my daughter." When asked about potential parallels to the past, Jamie said, "My parents and I came out of Jim Crow." "While I was at the end of it, we were the result of what happened in Jim Crow, because my parents, who came up from the south, they went into New York and we were discriminated against [by] Trump," she said. "He would not allow us as being Black people to live in his properties." When asked how she feels about recent ICE raids, Jamie said, "It makes me feel like we're going back and going back and going back, and we will not go back. We fought too hard. My mother, god bless her soul, she marched on Washington. And I cannot stand by while she marched on Washington and me not come out here and stand firm for her. God bless us all."
dlvr.it
'Your father had the courage': Meghan McCain under fire for comment about 'No Kings' rally
Meghan McCain came under fire on Saturday after she made an unpopular comment about the "No Kings" protests. Some analysts have hailed this weekend's pro-democracy protests as the largest on record, but political dynasty McCain, the daughter of the late GOP presidential candidate John McCain, does not understand the point. "I don’t understand how Trump is a King when he won every single swing state, the electoral college and popular vote in a democratic election," McCain wrote on X Saturday. That led to immediate responses from various high-profile political insiders. Atlantic writer Jonathan Chait asked the commentator, "Is it your view that literally nothing a freely elected president does in office can be anti democratic?" GOP pollster Mike Madrid said, "Your father had the courage to speak out against this." The popular Nerds for Humanity account told McCain that "winning fair and square doesn't make overreach okay." The account added, "Critics aren't calling him king for the vote, they're worried about power grabs like these: -Issuing an EO to end birthright citizenship, defying the 14th Amendment. -Firing 17+ inspectors general without the required 30-day notice to Congress, gutting independent oversight. -Invoking the Alien Enemies Act for mass deportations, a wartime power twisted for peacetime crackdowns. -Freezing congressionally approved federal funds, usurping lawmakers' purse strings. -Directing agencies to rewrite election rules with voter barriers, invading Congress's turf. Make sense?" Former GOP staffer Drew McDowell said, "Meghan McCain is doing her best to blow up her father’s legacy." "John McCain would be speaking at a No Kings rally today," he added on Saturday. One attorney, Christine Jones, pushed back on those bringing up Meghan McCain's father. "Why does every Meghan post bring out the 'your dad would have…' crowd, mostly people who never even met him?" she asked Saturday. "I knew John McCain fairly well, and I’d never presume to know how he’d react to any of Meghan’s posts. The compulsion to drag him into every conversation is just bizarre."
dlvr.it
'A confession': Onlookers stunned by new Trump military move that 'makes no sense'
Donald Trump's administration on Saturday shocked observers with a decision not to arrest two suspected peddlers of fentanyl. Trump over the weekend took the time to brag about a military strike, saying it was an "honor" while announcing that two were killed in the strike on a submarine. The New York Times also released a report focusing on the two survivors of the strike on the purported drug vessel, who were not arrested and were instead reportedly returned to their home countries. It's that report that baffled political and international law experts. Conservative attorney and anti-Trump activist George Conway said Saturday, "This is essentially a confession by administration that it committed murder." Immigration policy expert Aaron Reichlin-Melnick chimed in: "So the people on these boats are 'terrorists' who can be killed without any due process, but if they don’t die in the initial strike, they just get released and go home with a warning? Seriously?" Former Obama staffer Tommy Vietor said, "So the administration's argument is that these men are dangerous narco-terrorists waging war against the US and thus deserved to be executed, but also that the US should send them home rather than to try prosecute them in court. Makes sense." Political science professor Christopher Clary also added, "Enough evidence to try and kill them but not enough evidence to prosecute… what are we doing here exactly?" Political attorney Robert Kelner also weighed in, saying, "This makes no sense, if we are supposed to believe this was a drug trafficking ship and the attack on the ship was legal." "If that were so, why wouldn’t we detain the evil drug traffickers and prosecute them?" Kelner asked. "Congress needs to exercise its oversight authority. And reporters need to dig into this story."
dlvr.it
'Sharp break': Trump changes course by not arresting two survivors of military strike
Donald Trump's administration took a "sharp break" from its typical handling of military strike cases by choosing not to prosecute two survivors of an attack on a foreign suspected drug smuggling boat, according to the New York Times. Trump over the weekend took the time to brag about the military strike, saying it was an "honor" while announcing that two were killed in the strike. The Times also released a report focusing on the two survivors, who were not arrested. "The Trump administration has decided to repatriate two survivors of a deadly U.S. strike this week on suspected drug runners in the Caribbean Sea rather than prosecute them or hold them in military detention, people with knowledge of the matter said on Saturday," according to the report. "The men who survived were being returned to their home countries, Colombia and Ecuador, the people with knowledge of the matter said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss operational and diplomatic matters. It was not clear if the government of either nation would prosecute the men upon their return, or simply release them." The report continues: "President Trump has previously described people aboard suspected drug-smuggling boats, which the United States has targeted in several deadly airstrikes since early September, as 'unlawful combatants.' He has claimed the authority, widely disputed by legal experts, to summarily kill such suspects in military strikes as if they were enemy soldiers in a war." According to the Times report, the move "was a sharp break from the traditional handling of maritime smuggling, in which the Coast Guard would intercept boats and arrest people if suspicions proved accurate." Read the article here.
dlvr.it