Composition Studies
@compstudiesjrnl.bsky.social
220 followers 82 following 77 posts
An academic journal dedicated to the range of professional practices associated with rhetoric and composition.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Turns out, a lot of PhDs—and a lot of care.

Composition Studies 53.1 is now live.

Featuring essays on grading contracts, conference futures, sustainable teaching, and editorial care.

Read it here: compstudiesjournal.com/current-issu...

#cs531 #compositionstudies #rhetcomp #writingstudies
compstudiesjournal.com
If we want equitable writing classrooms, we must rethink how and why we regulate behavior — not just what we grade.

🔗 Read Gomes’s full piece: bit.ly/CS53-1
💬 What expectations—spoken or unspoken—shape how students show up in your classroom?
He invites us to imagine culturally sustaining pedagogies that:
✨ Center plural literacies
✨ Value diverse linguistic practices
✨ Challenge how schools define ‘good behavior’
Gomes argues that these “behavioral” expectations aren’t neutral. They often reflect White, able-bodied, middle-class norms that don’t align with all students’ realities.
Contract grading doesn’t just assess writing. It regulates behavior—how students act, participate, and even think about writing.”
What are we really grading — writing or behavior?
In Composition Studies 53.1, @mattgomes.bsky.social explores how grading contracts don’t just assess writing, but regulate how students act, participate, and even think about writing.

🔗 Read here: bit.ly/CS53-1
Kinkead closes by reflecting on what these preferences mean for teaching and for how we think about writing itself.

So—where do you stand: #TeamPilotG2 or #TeamInkJoy?

🔗 Read the full post here: bit.ly/Zen-Pen-Blog
Kinkead’s students overwhelmingly favored analog implements for reasons tied to aesthetics, creativity, nostalgia, and pleasure.

From the Pilot G2’s perfect point to PaperMate InkJoy’s smear-proof flair, students described tools as central to their writerly identity.
“Pilot G2 or nothing—a hill I’m willing to die on.”

Turns out, even so-called digital natives have strong feelings about analog writing tools.
New on the FEN blog: Joyce Kinkead’s collaboration with student researchers explores pens, pencils, and even quills in the classroom.

🔗 bit.ly/Zen-Pen-Blog
In a moment when “fast” feels like the only tempo higher ed allows, ACT reminds us that slowing down is radical.

🔗 Read the full Course Design: bit.ly/ACT-FYW
💬 How have you built small pauses into your teaching?
The ACT Model in First-Year Writing
by Casie Fedukovich and Brooke Mulhollem
bit.ly
The model draws on neuroscience—slowing down helps cultivate relaxed alertness, an “optimal state for learning.”

“Create a decision point… eliminate decision fatigue… use momentum to fight procrastination.”
The benefits run deeper than productivity hacks: ACT builds confidence and rewires habits.

“Helping students fight procrastination and decision fatigue and improve the writing process.”
Why ACT? Students were rushing through, fragmenting assignments, and “short-circuiting the long writing process.”

“Writing happened quickly, incompletely, and often without regard to expectations.”
So, what’s ACT? A one-minute metacognitive routine:

✨ Abide & Assess → pause and notice what’s actually been done
✨ Choose & Concrete → map out the next doable step
✨ Takeaway & Transition → name one insight, breathe, move forward
Teaching first-year writing in 2025 means juggling more than thesis statements. Students are navigating stress spirals, fragmented reading habits, and pandemic aftershocks.

Casie Fedukovich & Brooke Mulhollem offer a reset: the ACT model.

🔗 Read more: bit.ly/ACT-FYW
It’s time to reimagine conferences and volunteerism. What would it take to make them more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable?

🔗 Read Giaimo’s full piece in Composition Studies 53.1: bit.ly/42sukt6
bit.ly
Giaimo’s storytelling highlights the divide between the “center” and the “periphery.”

“This is what COVID-19, my stint at MLA, and all my service work has made me realize: academic conferences are experienced very differently from those in the center and those on the periphery.
Actionable ideas emerge: hybrid models, fair pay, shifting to advocacy.

“Since 2020, many academic associations have rethought their conference structure … IWCA rearranged itself into a semi-annual in-person conference. In the off-years, it holds an online conference.”
Giaimo reflects on the growing precarity in higher ed: adjunctification, unpaid labor, inequities.

“There is still a center and a periphery but over time these groups have become even more disproportionate and out of balance. The elect are few; the aspiring, many.”
In “Reimagining Academic Conferences and Professional Volunteerism in a World of Academic Precarity,” Genie Nicole Giaimo reflects on inequities in higher ed: adjunctification, unpaid labor, and the costs of traditional conferences.
How can we rethink academic conferences in a world of growing precarity?

In Composition Studies 53.1, Genie Nicole Giaimo reflects on the inequities of academic labor—and the possibilities for reimagining how we gather.
LBGCs don’t eliminate risk. They reframe it as part of the learning process.

What might teaching look like if we treated risk not as danger, but as opportunity?

Read Libertz’s full article in Composition Studies 53.1: bit.ly/CS53-1
Current Issue | Spring 2025, 53.1
Editorial Introduction: Charting Our Course Here and Forwardby Jacob Babb and Zachary Beare At a Glance Jaclyn Fiscus-Cannaday New Methodologies for Researching Reflection: Reflection-in-Motion in …
bit.ly
But it wasn’t all smooth sailing…
🔹 Some felt less motivated without the push of traditional grades
🔹 Others worried their final product wasn’t “quality” enough

Risk opened doors—but it also raised new questions.
In a collaborative podcast project, students reported:
🔹 More freedom to experiment with ideas & formats
🔹 Comfort in trying new roles
🔹 Less stress tied to “points” or grades

Risk started to feel like possibility.
So what’s a labor-based grading contract (LBGC)?
🔹 Grades are tied to effort and process
🔹 Less focus on “perfect products”
🔹 More room to experiment

The goal: shift from proving ability to building it.