Manuel Excel
@colintj.bsky.social
1.5K followers 490 following 2.6K posts
“A mainstay of charts and graphs twitter” - MGo “Top-notch, safe, family-friendly heckler” - Benetti
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
colintj.bsky.social
Technically they’re blitz/popping not just pre-defined rats but w/e
colintj.bsky.social
Unsurprisingly Mattison’s Michigan playbook has similar. Wonder how long the Ryan tree has been running this stuff.
colintj.bsky.social
And here’s the 0 Double Rat (aka Train in the 2010 Jets playbook)
colintj.bsky.social
Conveniently Michigan ran these in back to back plays in ‘22 against PSU bc we were offside on the first 3rd down. Here’s the show 0 drop into Tampa.
Reposted by Manuel Excel
collegefootballdata.com
I haven't had much time to jazz this up, but this is what I have for now. I'd like to go back and break it down by DC rather than HC.
colintj.bsky.social
Yeah if you’re stipulating that they would look like they’ve been coached by adults then I think you ofc take that
colintj.bsky.social
so you’re saying he’s already got the Franklin decision chart
colintj.bsky.social
I would tend to think better but I dk if they would actually understand their assignments.
colintj.bsky.social
Wink vs Minter
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
The original study used these questions, which did not actually ask about "desirability"!
colintj.bsky.social
a much slimmer resume than I would want but I’m not gonna tell you he can’t work.
colintj.bsky.social
Minter’s primary third down package was a 0 blitz with 2 rats and then Tampa off that.

He could coach that stuff. Wink can’t.

They don’t do the basics so ofc they can’t do the advance stuff.
colintj.bsky.social
can we see this as a histogram instead of a scatter plot?
colintj.bsky.social
An insurance policy with a robot plan?!
colintj.bsky.social
Yeah at some point stupid is stupid and Sherrone either has to recognize it and make the right hire to save his job or not.
colintj.bsky.social
I don’t think there’s any solving for it. They were closer to this by the end of last year where they just played him as a plug backer. Hit a gap and go find ball.
colintj.bsky.social
Yeah it's probably just a ton of skipped steps and cutting corners and lack of accountability. Barham and Hillman are out there doing dumb shit over and over and they play them anyway.
colintj.bsky.social
Tampa is the backbone of their 3rd down D. They would've installed it SUPER early and they should have repped it a ton.
colintj.bsky.social
If Penn State pays half a gajillion dollars to buy out James Franklin and hire Matt Rhule the cash for equity thing just makes everything so friggin clear. These guys just want cash to shove into budget holes and they'll do the same thing 5-10 years from now when the TV recession hits.
colintj.bsky.social
There's definitely plenty of stuff that's just not getting through. I am very confident they've told Barham to box vs. counter and he just...doesn't. But when you let that guy play anyway (and all the other examples of this) what are you telling the rest of your team?
colintj.bsky.social
Yeah that’s why I’m curious. Is the original thought process there but they’re not actually making sure their guys know? Or is the thought not there in the first place.
colintj.bsky.social
Very next play, they’re subbing their DL to STAY in 3-4 and nobody is lined up. Hillman I think is thinking that 2 is under so he’s free to help on 1. Obviously that’s not the case.
colintj.bsky.social
So he’s busy trying to figure out what they should be doing while the play just runs past him.

If you haven’t made sure your guys know what to do vs very common CFB wrinkles, you haven’t done your job. Really curious what these pages in the playbook looks like.
colintj.bsky.social
Hausmann knows the 2 under need to DOT—Drop Off Trips. Which means push both underneath defenders toward the 3 receiver side.

But what do you do vs 4 fast? Should the backers push out and have somebody weak solve for the inside most WR? Should they check to something else? They don’t know.
colintj.bsky.social
Here’s a good example of our guys not being given answers in their calls.

This is 3-4 vs 12 on 1st down after the 3rd and 1 that SC got into 12 for, tho I think they could’ve subbed. It’s a 4-deep 2-under fire zone.
colintj.bsky.social
😬
collegefootballdata.com
I had USC with a 66% (!) offensive success rate on standard downs and a 60% overall success rate. These are the type of numbers you'd expect to see against a MAC or FCS defense.