Cassandrus
@cassandrusb.bsky.social
180 followers 310 following 1.1K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
cassandrusb.bsky.social
You're not wrong, unless of course the states choose to enforce.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Someone should poll his constituents on how they feel about that statement. If they poll against, it might undermine the regressive movement and the Dark Enlightenment. If they poll for, then at least we know where not to expect help or sympathy from and can cut them off emotionally.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
They accidentally made a music festival!
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Oh. Sorry, when you said that it was because of something at school, I thought you meant it was a school-age kid and wondered why you weren't doing more. Late 40s is a lot more established in their ways, and there's not much room to teach anymore. :-/
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Only if you regard the expanse of federal executive power as valid. If SCOTUS can rewrite precedent, why can't we revisit Pierson v. Ray (the qualified immunity decision) or at least the mid-2000s expansion into ersatz unqualified immunity for federal law enforcement. Just gotta take a stand.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Courts don't enforce. That's literally why we have an executive branch. Congress legislates, the courts judge, and the executive branch is supposed to execute based on those two inputs.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Johnson's replies, while perhaps good theater, demonstrate that your suggestion approach doesn't work. The inherent flaw is the presumption that they feel an obligation to explain anything to folks who aren't their base. By this point, the Epstein lines are drawn.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
I hate with a passion that it, like so many things, ends with "Russian disinformation". Gods, imagine a world where a psychopath didn't run Russia.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
I would strongly recommend you consider not spreading legal interpretations if you are not an expert (i.e. a lawyer), then. You're getting people excited for something that isn't necessarily borne out by all law (particularly, note that US Code Title 2 Section 25 is more compelling here).
cassandrusb.bsky.social
The Sharks wouldn't even let me fursuit at games when I was a season ticket holder(and mine is a partial that wouldn't have blocked line of sight) so this makes me a little grumpy.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
I presume some of the regressives understand opsec better since your story, so the rest are the ones who didn't learn.
Reposted by Cassandrus
thetnholler.bsky.social
ICYMI: “And now, a response from the leader of the frog resistance...” 🐸 🎵 #Colbert
cassandrusb.bsky.social
No, you need to teach more aggressively that blaming an entire race is bad. Not liking a race or nationality is not an acceptable outcome. If you don't know how to teach this, research fundamental attribution error. Maybe toss the kid a copy of Thinking, Fast and Slow, by Kahneman.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
No. We need their kids to be exposed to the things their parents are scared of. Abandoning trans kids to the orthodoxy of their parents causes harm. Being exposed to different things, sometimes even scary things, is growth.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
It's true. When values deviate this much, what do you do? In a relationship, you can have a divorce, but in politics there's too many of each value structure embedded in the communities of the other (and that's presuming that physical community even has value in the 21st century).
cassandrusb.bsky.social
It might be interesting to explore that theme more directly (obviously too late for S2, but in the future, presuming that S2 doesn't render the entire question moot).
cassandrusb.bsky.social
They're just jealous that Jesus was closer in color to the people they're deporting than to them.

(Wait until they find out about the Samaritan leper and that Jesus didn't tell him to self-deport after being healed!)
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Oh. Oh, yeah, this makes more sense. Farm to Taber just did a video on H2A, so if MTG starts promoting the idea of "normalizing" immigrantss statuses by force-enrolling them indefinitely in that program, we might have a motive.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Why am I witnessing a chaotic evil safety guy adjudicate vampirism rules for a skeleton?
cassandrusb.bsky.social
The scary thing, and perhaps why we are where we are, is that these people *aren't* going to die in poverty. Even Yarvin has plenty of cash from previous tech work, even if we ignore the money being thrown at his Substack. This movement won't grow poor - it must be stopped via other means.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
Ok. Immigrants are real flesh and blood people who ideally should not be used as slave labor. AI, until it demonstrates an aversion to doing work, happily embraces repetitive tasks and allows humans to do things besides work.

Don't live a life enslaved to the idea of work as virtue.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
(I also don't have any sympathy at all for people who say of a particular piece of media "X is bad" instead of "in my opinion, X is bad" or "I don't like X." It is manipulative and meant to frame one's opinion as objective truth.)
cassandrusb.bsky.social
...that, while having your own opinion is perfectly valid, making it your mission to change others' opinions is invalid. Too many of those who fault Spindlehorse's works are too invested in trying to change others' opinions.
cassandrusb.bsky.social
The usual Latin quote trotted out when people are talking about opinions is "de gustibus non est disputandum." What people miss about it, especially in the current era, is that it translates to "matters of taste cannot be disputed." What this means to me is...