bearchowski.bsky.social
@bearchowski.bsky.social
19 followers 18 following 620 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Are you not embarrassed by yourself? This is a hilariously pathetic way of perceiving effective political engagement.
Building effective party infrastructure pales in comparison to my strategy, writing essays on Substack.
You want to signal an alternative, but you don't actually want to make it viable. You admitted you don't bother supporting them on a local level. You want to start somewhere and then go nowhere.
I'm sure the millions that are suffering from USAID being killed are grateful that you voted to "send a message."
I think the maximum impact your vote is, on election day, voting for the candidate which the greatest chance of defeating the Republicans.
You advocated voting for the Green Party to discredit the "Bourgeois parties." Why, if not to bring about their demise?
You believe the collapse of the Democratic Party is inevitable, and that the gradual collapse should be sped up? And that your ideology will emerge victorious from the ashes?
I thought you weren't advocating accelerationism?
As far as I'm concerned, yes this is the message of everyone concern trolling by reading my post as some sort of accelerationism, which I've explicitly said several times is not what I'm saying.
I noticed you've avoided answering the question for the third time. Now you pivot to the DSA. But I asked you about the Green Party.
You're evading again. Again I'll ask you, what material steps are they taking to actualize their agenda?
Wow, they have a party platform. What material steps are they taking to actualize their agenda?
Actually, the presidential election is an opportunity to elect an individual to the most powerful position on the planet, whose actions and policies have a serious impact on the lives of millions.
Is the Green Party building a viable alternative? Because it seems like its become little more than a vanity project for Jill Stein.
Are your principles more important than peoples' lives?
If the Green Party wanted to win, why do they only pop up during Presidential elections? Why do they put so little effort into winning local or state-wide election?
Seems like that's what majority of Democrats did in 2010 when they passed the ACA despite its impact on their electoral chances.
And just a reminder
Losing is no proof of fight.
How is the Green Party fighting for what they believe in?
Conservatives call me slurs when I disagree with them.
He watched them on TV. That's empirical, lib.
Yes, you do use eyes to watch TV. How does that prove these politicians don't believe in anything?
How can you ascertain that from watching TV?
Yep, you're the only freethinker on this site. Everyone who disagrees with you is brainless sheeple. You're so cool man.