austin robey
@austinrobey.xyz
550 followers 530 following 190 posts
Building socialist internet 🌐 Subvert @subvert.fm
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Co-ops are common sense
“but we have bandcamp” is the rallying cry of relative-best apologists, the accidental status quo defenders

willing to defend union busting and corporate ownership as long as it’s not spotify

they don’t understand that critiquing the best option is how you get better options
Saw Corey Doctorow talk to Lina Khan last night about enshittification

Loved the point about the limitations of founder virtue

Founders may see themselves as omni-benevolent, but they’re not omni-competent.

Corporate benevolent dictatorships are not durable
Today I heard “I’m starting the Subvert of Hollywood”
Today I heard “I’m starting the Subvert of science”

So cool
Today I heard “I’m starting the Subvert of science”

So cool
Reposted by austin robey
Last month we traveled to Spain's Basque region to visit Mondragon, the world's largest worker cooperative.

92 co-ops. 70,000 workers. €11 billion in revenue. Spain's 7th-largest company.

All collectively owned.

Here are 5 lessons for building a "Mondragon of Music"
A co-op can be a social base for future institution building

🌐
In <5 years @subvert.fm co-op will own a multi-use building in nyc

Mondragon of music
Market socialism is common sense
The founders to idolize are not Steve Jobs or Elon Musk - it's Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta

92 cooperatives
70,000 worker owners
€11 billion revenue
a university

All for the dignity of workers and community benefit. This is why there is a statue of him
Reposted by austin robey
I think what I’m doing would make 15 year old austin proud
I want to build a co-op

I want to meet with members

I don't want to go to a music industry mixer and shake hands with someone that works at suno
Music streaming discourse:

“Spotify’s founder invests in a military contractor

Instead, we should use YouTube music, a company owned by Google, a direct military contractor

A true alternative way to continue paying $10.99/ month to access all music”

🤯🤯🤯
If your “alternative” to streaming is a company with

-opaque deals
-opaque ownership
-undisclosed funding sources
-no democratic corporate governance

It might not be that much of an alternative
Hear me out. I think too much is blamed on Daniel Ek.

By suggesting systemic problems are the result of flawed individuals, we obscure and further mystify larger systemic challenges

Yes, ridicule him

But also remember that solutions don’t come from cooler capitalists in charge
100 new members joined Subvert Co-op yesterday

Each one owns as much of the company as I do
Music tech:

The platform is not the solution
Any startup is at best a future problem
Solidarity is the only solution
Sometimes the co-op community gets this backwards and confuses the means with the ends
Co-ops are a tool, not the end goal

What matters most:
-broad-based community ownership
-democratic governance
-less worker precarity
-greater utility and material benefit
-greater resilience, integrity, trust, and longevity
“Co-ops are great in theory, BUT…”
Reposted by austin robey
Subvert @subvert.fm · Aug 20
Our newly elected Board has approved our platform revenue model:

Optional Contributions instead of artist and label platform fees.

Supporters can optionally contribute at checkout. Artists and labels keep everything they earn.

0% platform fees. 100% community control.
Cooperatives are a means, not the end

Success isn’t -forming a co-op

It’s enabling broad-based ownership and creating material benefit for workers, and reducing precarity
From Caroline Woolard in "Ours to Hack and to Own": "So You Want To Start a Platform Cooperative"