Author | Lightnews

AttackOnCardboard

@attackoncardboard.com

680 followers 160 following 1K posts

So, you want to learn about Layers? 📺 YouTube.com/@attackoncardboard 🇦🇺 Commander Format Panelist 📧 [email protected] 📊 beacons.ai/attackoncardboard/

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · Nov 11

Magic: The Gathering Content Creators from Down Under 🇳🇿🇦🇺

Let me know if I've missed anyone!

go.bsky.app/GwGBtY6

7 3 17

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 21h

Mental Misstep is where it's at

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

You realise the "awful" thing I did was merely state how I felt about a card. I was not looking to "dunk" on the CEDH community. I even sent the person I quote tweeted an apology.

To say I'm acting in bad faith is ridiculous.

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

Oh yeah, I'm not saying "rules can't be changed". Having said that, I'm currently in camp "keep the current rules", but I'm completely open to discussion and have been reading all the comments on my YT poll.

1 3

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

Previously, Bosh was only a Colourless Commander. They expanded CI rules to look at *any* mana symbol on the rules text of a card.

1 1

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

Ty for the response. Ive had someone cited an old RC ruling that has since been deleted but I cant find anyone of authority talking about the interaction.

1 1

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

@taio.bsky.social am I wrong here?

I've had a couple of comments tell me this is incorrect.

The nitpick coming down to does "this effect doesnt remove auras" allows auras from Lightpaws to still bypass CR702.16c

youtube.com/shorts/k82ET...

Can you bypass this protection? - MTG Rules Question

YouTube video by Attack on Cardboard

youtube.com

1 1

Reposted by AttackOnCardboard

Grem, of 𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐏 🔜 Announcement! @gremlin.world · 1d

HOLY BALLS

#MTGxFF deal!
Grab the decks you missed!

4 2 16

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

Hi Cal, you mentioned "this is something like 5 months of it", do you have any example of this outside of the Jeweled Lotus saga last month? (And even that was that was was my own personal opinion, not looking to "dunk" on anyone).

Would be awfully slanderous to say so if there wasn't any...

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

You're literally not.

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 1d

I love reading YouTube comments

1 5

Reposted by AttackOnCardboard

Rachel Weeks @wachelreeks.com · 2d

No major changes to the Brackets this time, but we've been working on clarifying some of the ~*vibes~* around each Bracket, including adding "safe turns" and delineating expectations for decks, win conditions, and gameplay.

We've also removed tutor restriction from 1 & 2.

100 130 760

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 2d

Delightful.

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 2d

Here.

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 2d

Wait, so you're saying that people who don't know the colour identity rule today, will continue to not know the colour identity rule if we change the hybrid rule?

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 2d

There's literally nothing in the current rules stopping you from running a mono green Rhys deck. You control what cards you put in the deck.

2 2

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 2d

😏

Reposted by AttackOnCardboard

Tolarian Community College @tolariancommunitycollege.com · 4d

There are many people whose lives are so much better for having you in it.

Remember that. You are important, and you are loved.

37 450 1.7K

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 6d

Caramilk was GOATed last time I had it. Although if memory serves, they've changed the recipe. I'd still try it though.

Otherwise I'll always pick up a small bar of Marvellous Creations 🤤

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 6d

One thing I see people get confused is, as soon as priority is passed by everyone in the declare blockers step, you immediately move to the combat damage step and damage is immediately assigned and dealt. You can't do anything in-between damage assignment and damage dealt.

1 1

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 6d

So if you had a creature that says "whenever this creature deals damage, create that many treasures" you'd be able to respond to that trigger after it's put on the stack.

1 1

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 6d

The Foundation combat rules didn't change priority or timing. It simply removed damage assignment order.

It still goes: Beginning of combat - priority - declare attacks - priority - declare blocks - priority - combat damage - priority - end of combat- priority.

Reposted by AttackOnCardboard

blakepr.bsky.social @blakepr.bsky.social · 7d

Hey everyone, it’s been a while since I’ve weighed in on something on here, but since the influencer team reports up into me, let’s talk about this question (1/5)

22 98 390

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 9d

Me:

a little girl wearing a pink jacket is sitting at a table

ALT: a little girl wearing a pink jacket is sitting at a table

media.tenor.com

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 9d

Pre Modern exists and is going fine, there's no reason it can't work. It just needs someone to put in the effort.

AttackOnCardboard @attackoncardboard.com · 9d

To create a format that excludes UB while trying to feel like "traditional" standard (X sets + 1 core set)

1 2