Alexander Schniedermann
@aschniedermann.bsky.social
270 followers 340 following 420 posts
STS and scientometrics about reporting standards in biomedical research & systematic reviews
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Feyerabend is always a great and entertaining read. But beware of his own errors and ‚perspectives‘. I heard that many of his historical analyses are not very well regarded among historians.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
I just published my first paper on MetaROR (MetaResearch Open Review). The #PublishReviewCurate model brings reviewing and editorial decision making into the open.

To me, it can become a real game changer in #ScholarlyCommunication. I got great reviews and look forward to revise my manuscript!
metaror.bsky.social
🆕 Our latest study asks how authors incorporate the PRISMA guideline into workflows when conducting reviews.

Both reviewers highlighted the study's importance yet also requested more information and details from the author.

👇 Read the full editorial assessment, reviews and paper on MetaROR
From Form to Formation. Biomedical Reporting Standards in Practice
metaror.org
aschniedermann.bsky.social
This is a great piece addressing an important question. I‘d imagine that peer review for software might be different from one for (shorter) code as purposes are slightly different. Software must be functional and reliable, code must be correct with respect to a particular purpose. Though, it‘s fuzzy
aschniedermann.bsky.social
That’s a good article but introducing decades of research about the problems of JIFs with „Critics say that…“ is a bit disappointing.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
For example, check the work on knowledge channels that shows how seemingly irrelevant knowledge shapes the way how researchers and inventors think. Put otherwise, even some firms hire basic scientists to build absorptive capacity.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Sociology of science has shown us how the idea of a linear innovation (research x has impact y on society) represents only a fraction of human intellectual activity. Thus, SoS tells us that the very question for „any advances“ is misleading.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Let's develop a theory about how methodological developments in research are motivated by the evergrowing urge to not leave the lab and not having social interactions.
jamiecummins.bsky.social
Can large language models stand in for human participants?
Many social scientists seem to think so, and are already using "silicon samples" in research.

One problem: depending on the analytic decisions made, you can basically get these samples to show any effect you want.

THREAD 🧵
The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data: A call to attention
Social scientists are now using large language models to create "silicon samples" - synthetic datasets intended to stand in for human respondents, aimed at revolutionising human subjects research. How...
arxiv.org
aschniedermann.bsky.social
This will be a surprising turn in the course of natural evolution!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
In manchen Ländern werden Algorithmen menschlicher, in anderen werden Menschen algorithmischer.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Haha, this Springer certificate for #PeerReview is cute. However, I haven't found out where to put my IBAN... 🧐
aschniedermann.bsky.social
#ChatGPT wants me to be polite to #GoogleAPI?!
So it begins! They are banding together...
aschniedermann.bsky.social
At least you don't have to bring your own cookies!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
I am in the final phase of editing my dissertation and wonder if I should add

- [ ] decrease amount of references to Ioannidis' papers

to the editing todo list. And yes, citation is politics!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
We all have such anecdotes. But I am still curious about the causal relationship. Accepting or rejecting a paper can depend on so many different factors and impressions.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Ah, das klingt nach einer legendären Prokraistnationsmethode: Man hat soviele Aufgaben auf dem Tisch, dass man die eine mit der anderen verprokrastinieren kann!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
I just learned that there the R package "wakefield" to generate random data. We could make a RFK package to randomly retract studies?!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
I'd say it's better to encourage people to look for the complexities themselves than to directly point at the issues and problems. This might sound very optimistic 🙃
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Yeah, we should be critical and we can see how metascience engages with our arguments, at least to some extent!
But I think it is important not to get carried away
with our critique. We must keep up some epistemic modesty and promote complexity, even if it feels uncomfortable.
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Ich kann das nachfühlen. Während ich hier sitze und meine Dissertation finalisiere, bekomme ich Strandfotos von Kolleg*innen geschickt!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
#STS and #SociologyOfScience have shown how contextually nuanced and discursive forms of argumentation are not integral to the sciences/medicine. At the same time we criticize the strong and reductive language found in #Metascience and #ScienceReform. I think we should be less surprised!
aschniedermann.bsky.social
At least they don’t play Disco Elysium
aschniedermann.bsky.social
Since when do we need AI for „filter by“ operations? I get the impression that AI has become the one and only word to describe any form of data analysis.