Andrew Haslam-Jones
@andrewhj.bsky.social
560 followers 1.2K following 1.4K posts
Coach, Lawyer, Business Owner, MBA, husband, father, citizen of the world, migrant, Chair of Heath & Hampstead Society Town Sub-Committee
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
andrewhj.bsky.social
As ever, when people speak, they always tell you more about themselves than about that of which they are speaking.
andrewhj.bsky.social
Freedom.

Freedom from war
Freedom from constraints
Freedom to dream

Freedom
andrewhj.bsky.social
Yes, it clearly is enlightened self-interest. “Zero sum” is the mindset the exploiters propagate because it’s easy to understand and suits their divisiveness. The problem with “pro-European” is the zero summers can then contrast that with “pro-UK”.
andrewhj.bsky.social
Selling EU membership as generosity won’t work. I doubt the majority of EU citizens support EU membership because they see European unity as a good in and of itself. I think your analysis of it not being a “zero sum” game is nearer the point. The EU is about enlightened self-interest.
andrewhj.bsky.social
Dig down. Keep broadcasting the links to the Russian regime. Keep questioning how someone with such admiration of and ties to both Russia and the Trump administration and who spends so much time cultivating those links can be loyal to his constituents let alone his nation.
andrewhj.bsky.social
In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

(You’ll notice that the rows in the Menin Gate are quite well integrated.)
Reposted by Andrew Haslam-Jones
andrewhj.bsky.social
If you first accept that even in that system all the candidates would be preselected by small, unrepresentative groups of party members, maybe. Alternatively, you’re just setting up a more equal bun fight.
andrewhj.bsky.social
Just a slight shame that they had to rip the UK apart in order to do it.
Reposted by Andrew Haslam-Jones
fascinatorfun.bsky.social
That Brexit referendum to end the Tory melodrama is going so well, isn’t it?

Bet Cameron is pleased with himself.
rolandmcs.bsky.social
Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride's big speech.

#ToryPartyDeath
andrewhj.bsky.social
He leads the country like a barrister striving not to offend a judge whose opinion he cannot quite fathom.
Reposted by Andrew Haslam-Jones
billybragg.bsky.social
Free stickers suitable for flag-bearing lampposts. Send a large A4 envelope with a 1st class large stamp to me at Bragg Office, PO Box 6830 Bridport DT6 9BH and I’ll send you a sheet. #ReclaimtheFlag 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧
andrewhj.bsky.social
Now, imagine what this inexperienced and ignorant party would do in the speeding headlights of national government:
andrewhj.bsky.social
@georgemonbiot.bsky.social re Any Questions and our political system, 24 skimmable pages on what’s wrong with what we have and, from p 13, a utopian alternative: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/edvlv...
www.dropbox.com
andrewhj.bsky.social
Isn’t that just a factor of how a party political, first past the post electoral system works?
andrewhj.bsky.social
On what grounds do either of you think the ECHR has any jurisdiction here?
andrewhj.bsky.social
24 June 2016. David Cameron :
“The British people have voted to leave the European Union and their will must be respected.”
andrewhj.bsky.social
No. If you ask for advice, you don’t need to take it. Parliament is sovereign, unless it binds itself with a mandatory referendum (which this wasn’t). And the argument in court for the referendum not being void for irregularities was that Parliament had the power to ignore the result.
andrewhj.bsky.social
You’re relying on a pronouncement of David Davis rather than logic or law.
So:
There was an advisory referendum.
D Cameron said it would “be respected”.
T May tried to leave.
The SC in Miller said Parliament had to decide that.
So, effectively, the EU NoW Act was Parliament’s decision.
andrewhj.bsky.social
Parliament, by the EU NoW Act.