Allan Oooh-lley👻
banner
allanolley.bsky.social
Allan Oooh-lley👻
@allanolley.bsky.social
84 followers 110 following 1K posts
Fan of many things and over degreed and underemployed. Groucho Marxist. 🥸 Advocate of mining the Sun for helium. ⛏️🔆
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
You'd have some eminence grise virologist say "that's not how you id a virus" because it used a technique developed after his salad days. Invocation of unsystematic or anecdotal evidence (the funeral homes aren't doing a brisk enough trade in South Africa for there to be a plague) and so on.
The encounter I remember with AIDS denialism was reading Kary Mullis's autobiography (back in the late 90s early 2000s), Mullis is a deeply flakey guy by his own account. I remember bumping into it here or there talking to people or reading internet conversations about it, it seemed typically bad.
The thing that got me is that apparently the logic is something like:

"Don't support the Democrats or mainstream movements who promise little and deliver little or nothing. Instead support other movements that have delivered even less, but at least promise more."
Whereas the makers of the Chevy Chase Memoirs of an Invisible Man decided they should double down on it.
I got all these from the Facebook feed of a lefty (there were also some vaguely positive responses, but also lots more blanket criticism).
No danger of being proven wrong. 🙄 Criticisms vary, a lot seem to be based in the hatred of brunch.

I "like" the one that says not accomplishing things is damning. I mean if you want me to drop any political movement that fails to immediately accomplish things, okay. Are you sure about that?👀
Stirring seems essential in cooking (or mixing drinks say) which is surely within the ambit of chemically. Not stirring enough definitely yields chemically different baked goods etc.

So it seems like any inefficacy of stirring is specific to a set of conditions as the chemical engineers suggest.
ποῖον σε ἔπος φύγεν ἕρκος ὀδόντων

What got stuck in your teeth?
It was the time before (English) spelling had been invented (or at least the tail end of that period).
Wordle 1,580 6/6

🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Hmm this and the last xkcd are sort of establishing a theme.
Not for comedies, but I did consider how the kids in Liberty's Kids never age from 1773 to 1789 as part of my pro-British anti-revolutionary reinterpretation (clearly those malcontents were starving those poor children).
It does actually predate George Lucas saying it (earliest instance found is by psychoanalyst Theodor Reik in 1965), even if Twain never said it. Twain did actually say history does not repeat itself, but not the rhyming thing.

quoteinvestigator.com/2014/01/12/h...
quoteinvestigator.com
I totally thought of them (the ones that have lots of songs) as musicals and in my memory the ads for them (in the 80s and 90s) they were advertised as such ("latest musical animated film from Disney" or something), although I'm not sure if that is true, watching a few old ads does not confirm it.
Yeah, TRON Uprising was great!
I didn't notice the odd name, but I was wondering wait specifically Coca Cola or is this like referring to all "soda pop" as "Coke" as in some parts of the US? Coke cola suggests a contrast with things like Pepsi Cola, but it seems unlikely that the British government would single out one brand.🤷‍♂️
You mean "intensive porpoises" the most exacting and pedantic members of the animal kingdom.
What is at work is we interpret the entire sentence to convey something like:

"His expression of surprise was so emphatic that the short hop he made felt to me the observer as though he leapt 10 feet in the air."

Maybe?
I think we need to keep in mind that when we speak ironically or hyperbolically etc. the meaning of the words is not what changes, rather the entire sentence gives an interpretative context.

If we interpret "He was so surprised he jumped 10 feet in air." as hyperbole "10 feet" means "10 feet".
Tellingly using "literally" to mean "not figurative" is a figurative use of literally. Literally comes from the Latin for letter, but when someone says "two things are literally the same", they often mean "exactly the same" but there are no letters involved. Or so I think of it.
Tron is one of those bad ideas that every once and awhile someone looks at and says, sure its failed every other time, but surely I'm different.
I'd be glad to be corrected, but based on a quick search the movie, seems to be only streaming in Japan.