Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Alissa Cooper

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 13d

New @nytimes.com: @juliaangwin.com explains how the US v. Google remedies ruling could further entrench Google’s search dominance.

KGI’s @alissacooper.bsky.social notes “[t]he remedies here are unlikely to create the circumstances for competitive entry in search.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/o...

Opinion | Google Wins, We Lose

www.nytimes.com

1 2

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · 15d

Very excited to host Jonathan Sallet at Georgetown next week! Come hear directly from a lead litigator in U.S. v. Google search. Free lunch for those joining in person, or live stream for those joining remotely. Registration required.

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 15d

🚨Event alert! “Google Search: A View from the Counsel’s Table”

Join us Oct 8 (in person or virtually) as Jonathan Sallet, lead litigator for the State Plaintiffs in the US v. Google search antitrust case, breaks down the case and the remedies ruling.

Register: www.eventbrite.com/e/google-sea...

1

Reposted by Alissa Cooper

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 18d

We're speaking at two #TSRConf sessions today at 11:30am PT. @alissacooper.bsky.social's “Fixing the Feeds: A Policy Road Map to Address Algorithmic Recommender System Harms” will provide insights on how algorithms can be better designed to put user well-being and long term user value first.

1 2 5

Reposted by Alissa Cooper

Leticia Bode @leticiabode.bsky.social · 18d

Come hang out with us and talk about data access! #tsrconf

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 18d

Also at 11:30am PT, @leticiabode.bsky.social cohosts a workshop w/ @naomishiffman.bsky.social, @angieholan.bsky.social & @whiskeyocelot.bsky.social “Let’s Share: A Framework for Researcher Access to Publicly Available Platform Data” to preview our new framework! Be sure to join + say hello #TSRConf

3 4

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · 19d

Haven't read enough about the Google search antitrust remedies? We have more for you ...

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 19d

📣 New on @techpolicypress.bsky.social: Our analysis of US v. Google digs deep into Judge Mehta’s remedies ruling, exploring what we can expect from the data sharing remedies in the absence of a ban on default payments. Read more from @alissacooper.bsky.social 👇
www.techpolicy.press/without-a-pa...

Without a Payment Ban, What Can We Expect from the US v. Google Data Sharing Remedies? | TechPolicy.Press

There is time to try to understand how the other remedies might work and if they can open the search market to competitors, writes Alissa Cooper.

www.techpolicy.press

4 9

Reposted by Alissa Cooper

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 25d

This week, KGI’s @alissacooper.bsky.social is featured in NPR about what the Google Search antitrust ruling means for the future of AI and why the remedies may be too limited to pave the way for more search competition.

Full story here 👉 www.npr.org/2025/09/18/n...

What does the Google antitrust ruling mean for the future of AI?

A federal judge's mild ruling in the Justice Department's suit over Google's search engine monopoly has critics worried that the tech giant can now monopolize artificial intelligence.

www.npr.org

1 2

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · 26d

DCC 2026 -- our annual competition conference bringing together researchers, policy experts and practitioners -- is accepting paper submissions until October 13. Get those fingers typing ...

Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) @knightgtown.bsky.social · 28d

🚨Antitrust & digital competition are in the news almost daily – from decisions issued in cases against Google search and ad tech to DMA enforcement actions involving Apple and Meta and new private litigation in multiple jurisdictions. 👇

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 12

Thanks to @sumitecon.bsky.social for reminding us that the CMA has done the world a public service through thorough investigation of the search market. Too bad the US court did not consider what the CMA already found about limited search syndication serving as a barrier, not a boost, to competition.

Sumit Sharma @sumitecon.bsky.social · Sep 12

My take on the Google search remedies decision in
@techpolicypress.bsky.social

➡️Remedies Not Enough as Google will still be default ➡️None of the other remedies compensate for this
➡️ Just relying on AI is bananas

www.techpolicy.press/us-courts-re...

US Court's Remedies Not Enough Given Google Can Continue to Pay for Search Defaults | TechPolicy.Press

The remedies ordered will not pry open competition, because Google can continue to pay to be a default service, writes Sumit Sharma.

www.techpolicy.press

2

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Much more to come as this opinion gets digested ...

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Our own independent analysis has shown that the divestiture is technically feasible. kgi.georgetown.edu/research-and...

The Technical Feasibility of Divesting Google Chrome – Knight-Georgetown Institute

kgi.georgetown.edu

1 1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Lastly -- to the question of what evidence are we relying on here? -- the opinion seemingly buys into the narrative that Google and its witnesses shared at trial about the technical infeasibility of the Chrome divestiture.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Importantly, while AI companies “may yet prove to be game changers” the court itself has found that “Google is a monopolist” and the hypothetical future does not eliminate the need to resolve the existing present.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The contrast of this adoption of common AI hype narratives by the same court that meticulously analyzed evidence to establish its general search market definition and liability finding is stark.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The opinion relies heavily on testimony from actors whose business interests benefit from the public perception and belief that generative AI is competitive and growing explosively.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The opinion claims that the “GenAI space is highly competitive” even though the basis for this claim falls far short of what would be expected if generative AI were the market that was the subject of the litigation.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

After issuing a liability opinion thoroughly supported by findings of harm in the existing search market, the remedy opinion relies on speculation about future competitive benefit in adjacent markets.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Quite different from what we explored in Considerations for Effective Search Competition Remedies. kgi.georgetown.edu/research-and...

Considerations for Effective Search Competition Remedies – Knight-Georgetown Institute

kgi.georgetown.edu

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

While the opinion includes remedies whose stated purpose is to address both access to distribution and access to data for quality improvement, the hollow approach in both cases is not likely to spur competition.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The court’s opinion pays lip service to the well-supported finding that a package of remedies is required to address the interlocking, mutually reinforcing dynamics of the search market.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The impact of those has been negligible (less than 1% change in Google’s market share) because the OEMs’ total dependence on Android to operate in the market rendered the contractual changes impotent. That dependence is as strong in the US as it is in the EU, so we can expect the same result.

1 1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

At KGI we think a lot about concrete evidence. Seven years ago, the European Commission instituted contractual prohibitions in its Google Android case that were of a similar nature to those included by the court here.

1 1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

Despite mentioning five times the finding that the search market is “frozen,” this logic would leave innovation and dynamism in that market suppressed by keeping defaults locked only to the highest bidder.

1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

The court appeared to view potential harm to businesses like Apple, Samsung, and Mozilla that rely on default payments from Google’s monopoly profits as a reason to preserve Google’s payments.

1 1

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

See also "Judicial Remedies to Restore Lost Competition in the Market for General Search" for an economic analysis of entry barriers and a demonstration of how the court could have facilitated a partial payment ban. www.michiganstatelawreview.org/forum2024202... @proffionasm.bsky.social

Judicial Remedies To Restore Competition in the Market for General Search"Spring Symposium: Connected-Vehicle Techonology and the Law"

www.michiganstatelawreview.org

1 2 3

Alissa Cooper @alissacooper.bsky.social · Sep 3

This happened despite the court receiving multiple proposals for partial payment bans, including from Motorola (to exempt small mobile device vendors) and Mozilla (to exempt independent browsers).

1