AI can't create art, but a person showing off their deranged generations, the best output they've managed to curate, like it's the future of anything, themselves become a piece of outsider art. Like a fecal mural painted by a toddler or someone on bath salts and presented with pride by the artist.
But have you considered the "Lazy cunts who want to be considered artists and/or make a lot of money doing nothing" problem? Can't solve that without creating a simulator of the dying brain of a modern military shooter enthusiast.
I'll give it this: before AI I could never imagine that a video can transfer the smell of burnt toast without some special equipment on the receiving end.
I like it when something is so obscure and inconsequential that a Wikipedia writer can get away with a bit of humor. Also love that the synopsis implies that a CEO needs a whole secret identity to watch movies with her cat and surf the web.
This seems to be false marketing obscured as "reporting" by an astroturfed account. Google search for the companies only returns this Instagram post and a bunch of other attempts at virality by higgsfield ai.
After he got shot by the guy who got kicked out of a sex cult his treatment was taken over by his friend Doctor Bliss, who supported homeopathy. Doctor Bliss insisted on trying to remove the bullet, looking for it in the wrong direction and disturbing the wound for weeks, which prevented recovery.
Yes. Her predecessors seemed to do well. I don't think he cares as long as he can have some armcandy as a status symbol. A bigger consideration for her would be whether her personal brand is too poisoned, but I think she could still hack it in the grifter circles.
You are assuming that she is a victim. Either a victim of KGB, or of him. And like, I have no illusions about the modeling business, she probably went through some shit if she was in it since 16. But she's 55 now. I think it's fair to say she's personally responsible for her continued involvement.
A term made up by a hack writer to associate a distasteful but common intelligence practice with the Soviet union. Used in this case to deny a woman's agency.
