Andrew Dunford
banner
ajdunford.bsky.social
Andrew Dunford
@ajdunford.bsky.social
230 followers 240 following 630 posts
Photography and sport, particularly football. Also some other stuff sometimes.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Please don’t shut it down
Is right. Simple truths. Really glad he’s getting them aired.
Sounds absurd, thanks for the info
What is the point of this?
Hopefully this will somehow work out with you having nothing to do tomorrow except relax.
Same. Although YP has certainly had teething problems I’m not quite writing them off yet.

Hoping that greens and YP can form some kind of pact to fight far right.
Toffee through and through as well.
The ref definitely saw that he was down holding his head. He made a judgement call to let play go on a few seconds.

I don’t see how that could possibly be doubted.
That’s true. But ref has to gauge what he sees and how likely it is a serious head injury has been sustained. Some incidents it’s very clear that there has been a huge collision with the head so I expect the ref to go straight to his whistle, other incidents maybe let a little bit of play finish.
Also it is possible to say that the ref made the right call and didn’t need to stop play - because he wasn’t concussed, he didn’t leave the field even.
Imagine being them.

Then give thanks that you’re not.
I thoroughly enjoyed the commanders D making the safety signs when they forced a safety earlier.
Of course you know that is just horse shit
Somehow outlawing monetarisation, and the algorithms which enable and promote it, would definitely help.
I never wanted to do that. I have liked some of your other work.

If you had done some decent journalism - perhaps covering other possible angles and getting opinions from other sources this might be a different article
You also understand then that I had enough knowledge of the scheme to make my comment, because after reading it nothing else in the article said anything relating to my comment. Which still stands as a valid criticism of it.

Pity it’s come to this, I have to call you out for client journalism
So you either didn’t read my question properly, or are pretending you weren’t replying to it

It’s obviously the latter - either way your responses are a pathetic attempt to dodge

It’s a pity we have reached a point where I have to call you out, my initial comment was a criticism of the scheme…
😂whatever

My initial point was about what a waste of money and bad idea environmentally the proposal was - and reading the article made no difference.

The direct question I asked you was about transport spending.

It makes sense to read a question and understand it before replying
I asked: “am I wrong does it mention public transport spending?”

You replied: “yes you are wrong”

Not true is it? Because it doesn’t mention any spending on green public transport does it? I wasn’t wrong was I? So what you posted wasn’t true was it?