Statutory interpretation, legislation, federal courts, administrative law
Research: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=648978
Posts do not speak for my employer
I write about legislation and judicial process. I’m currently working on papers about (1) statutes that backstop threatened constitutional rights, (2) pre-Erie understandings of interpretive methods.
Sometimes post fun stuff from old books.
Kant 1
Hegel ?
Left: Hunter Biden motion for default judgment
Right: Judge Smith’s dissent in Texas redistricting case
(Smith’s reference is obviously meant to be negative, but given the tenor of the dissent, how to score?)
Kant 1
Hegel ?
Left: Hunter Biden motion for default judgment
Right: Judge Smith’s dissent in Texas redistricting case
(Smith’s reference is obviously meant to be negative, but given the tenor of the dissent, how to score?)
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Among my other things, some nice points about congressional reliance on Humphrey’s Executor:
Among my other things, some nice points about congressional reliance on Humphrey’s Executor:
I listened to the oral argument.
Reactions in next post.
Docket and briefs at this link:
I listened to the oral argument.
Reactions in next post.
Docket and briefs at this link:
#pedantry
#pedantry
@dividedargument.bsky.social
@dividedargument.bsky.social
I am honored to be this year’s Kelly Professor for Excellence in Teaching. The professorship comes with the duty to present lunchtime sessions to my colleagues on teaching-related themes. What ideas do you have?
I am honored to be this year’s Kelly Professor for Excellence in Teaching. The professorship comes with the duty to present lunchtime sessions to my colleagues on teaching-related themes. What ideas do you have?
The Democracy Project at @nyulaw.bsky.social is publishing a daily essay from authors across the ideological spectrum to explore the issues facing democracy today.
Read the first three essays: democracyproject.org
www.yalejreg.com/nc/looming-m...
www.yalejreg.com/nc/looming-m...
thehill.com/homenews/adm...
thehill.com/homenews/adm...
Have I got the (short!) draft article for you.
Here is the link.
Abstract in next post.
⚖️ 🗃️
Have I got the (short!) draft article for you.
Here is the link.
Abstract in next post.
⚖️ 🗃️
Case for “less likely”:
1) Court would pay the legitimacy cost of overruling without getting much policy benefit.*
2) RMA shows enactable legislative preferences / public opinion.
1/3
Case for “less likely”:
1) Court would pay the legitimacy cost of overruling without getting much policy benefit.*
2) RMA shows enactable legislative preferences / public opinion.
1/3
Our latest update to 50constitutions.org adds tracking constitutional change features to 4 additional states!
These tools allow users to explore a state's full amendment history.
50constitutions.org
Our latest update to 50constitutions.org adds tracking constitutional change features to 4 additional states!
These tools allow users to explore a state's full amendment history.
50constitutions.org
Have I got the (short!) draft article for you.
Here is the link.
Abstract in next post.
⚖️ 🗃️
Have I got the (short!) draft article for you.
Here is the link.
Abstract in next post.
⚖️ 🗃️
Pictured: beautiful door on a church in Naxos, Greece.
Pictured: beautiful door on a church in Naxos, Greece.
Yes, and in this thread I’ll give a short version of the story of Judge Platt Potter, held in contempt of the NY Assembly in 1870. The story is a bit zany, as Potter went to unusual lengths to publicize his side of it.
⚖️🗃️
🧵
Yes, and in this thread I’ll give a short version of the story of Judge Platt Potter, held in contempt of the NY Assembly in 1870. The story is a bit zany, as Potter went to unusual lengths to publicize his side of it.
⚖️🗃️
🧵
(Tl;dr is class certification is right.)
@dividedargument.bsky.social
substack.com/home/post/p-...
(Tl;dr is class certification is right.)
@dividedargument.bsky.social
substack.com/home/post/p-...
#LawSky
Not a normal court, sure, but the first appeals in England were in the church courts, a hierarchical system where appeals ran eventually to Rome (before Henry VIII’s break). Then equity had appeals. The common law had the clunky writ of error until relatively recently.
#LawSky
Not a normal court, sure, but the first appeals in England were in the church courts, a hierarchical system where appeals ran eventually to Rome (before Henry VIII’s break). Then equity had appeals. The common law had the clunky writ of error until relatively recently.