Author | Lightnews

Yayael (Politics)

@yyutopian.bsky.social

40 followers 20 following 480 posts

Arawak Anarchist, Certified Genderfucker. Anti-Fascist. Rebellious Boriken Soul. They/Them.

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 6d

REKLAIM our bodies.

REKLAIM our ways of being.

REKLAIM our lands from corporate colonizers.

REKLAIM the Earth.

#REKLAIM

A stylized depiction of a person wearing a headband. They have long hair and scarlet skin.

At the bottom, there is a stylized text that says "REKLAIM"

2 1 1

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

Zohran Kwame Mamdani @zohrankmamdani.bsky.social · 9h

Without the night shift, there is no morning.

YouTube video by Zohran Mamdani for NYC

www.youtube.com

140 1.3K 8.5K

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 1h

I saw a Cuomo ad last night that was basically "if there's another 9/11, we need a mayor with experience like Andrew Cuomo," and it made me wonder, wait, what was Andrew Cuomo doing on 9/11?

Well, he was probably preoccupied with damage control for this:

nypost.com/2001/09/10/p...

PROBE RIPS ANDY IN $130M HUD MESS
By Deborah Orin
Published Sep. 10, 2001, 4:00 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON – Federal watchdogs today will testify that Andrew Cuomo’s “lax oversight” let crooks loot a housing program for the poor that will now cost taxpayers $130 million to bail out.

At issue is Cuomo’s role as Bill Clinton’s secretary of Housing and Urban Development and his pet home-ownership program for the poor, which collapsed in scandal.

Today’s bipartisan congressional hearing was called by Rep. Sue Kelly (R-Westchester), with Reps. Charles Rangel (D-Harlem) – who backs Cuomo’s gubernatorial rival Carl McCall – and Felix Grucci (R-L.I.) also expected.

“Decisions made during [Cuomo’s] tenure opened up this program to widespread fraud and abuse while the concerns of federal investigators were ignored,” Kelly said.

The program was supposed to help poor people fix up housing. But instead, it left tenants stuck in 719 homes – including almost 200 Harlem brownstones – that are mostly a mess, in foreclosure and, in some cases, without heat.

31 340 1.1K

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 22m

I agree.

The pseudo "democracy" of the United States causes MILLIONS to starve and create imperialist dictatorships against other countries, all for the sake of monetary interests.

And if you want proof? Look at the actions of the government right now:

Starving people, brutal suppression, etc.

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

The Serfs (youtube.com/theserfstv) @theserfstv.bsky.social · 17h

The Lord of the Rings was about the forces of darkness being unable to imagine its enemies would ever unite together to destroy the most powerful weapon in the world rather than be corrupted by it. Dune was about imperial colonialism over the exploitation of resources and how power ultimately would corrupt any ruler who once thought themselves as moral fighting on the behalf of the colonized. Star Wars was about the rise of imperial fascism and a guerilla roots rebellion rising to ultimately destroy and liberate the people from it. The third film compares the Empire to America and the Rebels to Viet Con. The Matrix Trilogy is about how systems of control ultimately serve to even make liberation from them a feature of the same system. On an individual level it’s also a trans allegory. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are evil nerds with no media literacy that are trying to destroy the planet because they thought the bad guys had a point.

7 65 260

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

I can't believe I have to explain this, but there's a major difference between an ethnosupremacist, totalitarian, hierarchical ideology(Nazism)... and an anarchist, labour-owned ideology where resources are collectively owned (Communism).

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

Communism is good, and the USSR's heavily modified application of it was terrible.

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

Communism is different because the main goal is to create a stateless, classless society where resources are owned by the public and that people own the fruits of their labor.

The USSR did commit atrocities, but the atrocities were not baked into communism itself, so it's more accurate to say:

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

Its adherents are evil.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

Nazism is bad because the ideology believes that the state(ruled by a dictator) should have total control over everyone's lives enforce racial/national supremacy, and commit genocide against dissenters.

In this case, genocide is directly tied to the ideology, which is why we say that

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 19h

Indeed, and that's the difference between us and that other person:

We look at the values that a given ideology espouses separately from the individuals who hold said ideology.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 20h

We're dumb genocidal and discriminatory supporters*

*This can only be true if he wanted to argue that rich people are a racial/ethnic/religious/national group.*

*Well, if worshipping money over human lives was a religion, maybe he'd have a point, but that's not a religion.

Daniel says "oh you are just a dumb genocidal and discriminatory supporter! Well of course every commie is! By the way sucks to suck you dumb losers. Your genocidal states are gone the same way nazi ones are. Can't wait when the world wakes and decides to treat you like nazis post world War 2."

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

Gary R Simonds @garys79.bsky.social · 21h

Amen

Let's go after EVERY solitary pedophile - republican or dem
If it empties out SCOTUS and congress, so be it.

5 64 240

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 20h

(american) LIBERALS AND "DEMOCRACY" got you Project 2025.

"How? It was the conservative's playbook!"

Because you still advocated for a system that fundamentally allowed the wealthy to become puppetmasters:

Capitalism.

And now you're paying the price.

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 20h

Ah yes, the movement that was about giving power back to the people (DEMOCRACY/SOCIALISM) is the same as the one who deigned to enforce hierarchy. (Nazis/monarchists).

Absolute logic.

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 20h

Ah yes, the movement that was about giving power back to the people (DEMOCRACY/SOCIALISM) is the same as the one who deigned to enforce hierarchy. (Nazis/monarchists).

Absolute logic.

1 1

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

Anti-Fascist Collective…. 👊🏼👊🏽👊🏿 @wtafc.bsky.social · 1d

340 2.7K 8.8K

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

The most INFURIATING part of Web3's current trajectory is that the current dominant system is oriented towards speculative plutocracy (rule of those with the most crypto) rather than as a tool to break the bourgeois chains of capitalism; a tool to free the people.

Reposted by Yayael (Politics)

The Serfs (youtube.com/theserfstv) @theserfstv.bsky.social · 2d

There's no such thing as anti-war right.

They're bloodthirsty imperialists who are fine raging war both on their own people and abroad

U.S. poised to strike military targets in Venezuela in escalation against Maduro regime By Antonio María Delgado Updated October 31, 2025 1:22 PM Gift Article The Trump Administration has made the decision to attack military installations inside Venezuela and the strikes could come at any moment, sources with knowledge of the situation told the Miami Herald, as the U.S. prepares to initiate the next stage of its campaign against the Soles drug cartel. The planned attacks, also reported by the Wall Street Journal, will seek to destroy military installations used by the drug-trafficking organization the U.S. says is headed by Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro and run by top members of his regime.

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article312722642.html#storylink=cpy

6 22 140

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

In short, sex fundamentalists claim trans women steal womanhood. If it’s purely biological, as they insist, personal expression can’t touch it. Claiming it can be stolen admits womanhood’s a social construct, gutting their own logic.

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

A common argument sexfundamentalists (extremists who believe that one's reproductive biology should determine their basic freedoms) is that trans women are in "woman-face" or otherwise misappropriating "womanhood."

This is incorrect and here's why:

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

If they claim that womanhood can be "mocked" by adopting feminine cultural presentations, then their strictly biological definition becomes a social construct argument, which directly contradicts their "biological" stance.

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

2. If womanhood, as they claim, is distinctly biological, then it is impossible to "capture" womanhood through personal expression, making "womanface" nothing more than a baseless sex-conformist insult hurled at people who exercise their right to personal identity.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

There are two main issues with their claims:

1. Their comparison fails because "race" is a *social construct* (i.e. NOT biological) revolving around the idea that people with different skin colors are distinct subspecies from one another instead of mere melanin variations.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

"Womanface" is a comparison akin to blackface (the act of portraying oneself as a CARICATURE of a black person for the purpose of mocking them.)

One of their core positions is that everything regarding the "adult human female" experience is inherently biological(and NOT cultural.)

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

"Womanhood" is the cultural experiences attached to people who society sees as women.

"Womanface" is the idea that that someone whom society identifies as a man can misappropriate womanhood by adopting culturally feminine presentations, or identifying themself as a woman.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

What do I mean by that?

A social construct is an idea/category created by people in a society whose meaning/reality is shaped by cultural norms and human interactions.

"Womanhood" is a social construct because its meaning is shaped by the individuals that participate in a society.

1 1

Yayael (Politics) @yyutopian.bsky.social · 1d

Mind you, this definition makes no claim of any cultural implications, or social constructs.

"Womanface" and "womanhood", however, are *social constructs*, not biological realities, much to the chagrin of the sexfundamentalist ideologues.

1 1