toplayinla.bsky.social
LightNews LightNews
toplayinla.bsky.social
@toplayinla.bsky.social
1 followers 5 following 220 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 5h
You two deserve each other
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 5h
Have repeatedly said he isn't a good candidate you dunce
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 9h
You are literally just making up stats.
1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 9h
Saying "i don't have proof but the vibes are off" would have a lot shorter and honest.
2 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 9h
Be serious.
1 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
That's fine to think that: just don't make that argument by citing bogus outlets and speculatation.
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
Jewish Insider has a history of islamophobic reporting and is owned by Max Neuberger, who is on the board of directors of ADL. They are not a reputable source.

And if you actually read my comment, you'd see I believe his ignorance alone is disqualifying.

www.adl.org/staff/max-ne...
www.adl.org
2
Reposted by toplayinla.bsky.social
nberlat.bsky.social
Noah Berlatsky @nberlat.bsky.social · 19h
redemption arcs do not need to include a senate seat. and they should not.
2 12 85
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
Suggesting that Platner knew for years and covered it up but is somehow not a Nazi sympathizer by extension is silly. People are only now backtracking that insinuation because it's becoming obvious he's simply an idiot.
1 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
I would refer you to my first comment.
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
Condemning misinformation is not "splitting hairs"
1 2
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 11h
bsky.app/profile/kate...
1 5
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
Another good one

www.everythingishorrible.net/p/graham-pla...
Graham Platner Is Not Going to Be Senator
Bad choices sometimes have consequences
www.everythingishorrible.net
1 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
And why is there this fixation on clearing a bar that doesn't need to be cleared to declare Platner disqualifying? Why can't people say "idc if you didn't know. That is a disqualifying level of ignorance when fascism poses an existential threat to the country and our most vulnerable Americans?"
1 2
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
Based on what? People keep insisting he "must" have known but I dare anyone who asserts that as fact to turn to anyone not online and ask them if they have even heard of the totenkopf let alone describe it. Why is it presumed it's as widely known as the swastika?
1 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
I have to wonder how many people had even heard of the totenkopf before yesterday, or could even physically describe it *now*.
1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
Where is the evidence he knew it's meaning before last month? If people want to say his ignorance is disqualifying, that's reasonable. It's not reasonable to posit he definitely knew based on what amounts to vibes.
4 3
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 12h
This is on a very short list that tried to do a serious moral assessment of Platner calling for him to drop out without engaging in naked misinformation or willfully obtuse speculation.
1 1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 15h
He should drop out, but you will never convince me people are not more than the worst thing they've done or that misinformation is a good thing. There's is something deeply upsetting how many people are fine with simply lying to gild the lilly.
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 15h
No one is "defending the tattoo": his defenders are making the case ignorance is an acceptable excuse. If that's not good enough for you, that's not only fine, I agree with it.
1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 15h
Cannot understand this insistence on being willfully obtuse about the nature of Platner's tattoo and his defenders. It's a very easy/grounded case to say "even a face value reading of Platner's mea culpa is disqualifying b/c that is an intolerable level of ignorance for a Dem US senate candidate"
1
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 15h
They are not doing that! Why are people so adamant about misrepresenting the facts of the case? Why can't it be "even a face value reading of Platner's mea culpa is still disqualifying"? Why must we make up accusations?
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 15h
You cheered on the Wagner group's coup in Russia and deleted it once you learned of their Nazi associations. You don't have any moral highground here.
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 16h
And of course he blocked me.
toplayinla.bsky.social @toplayinla.bsky.social · 16h
Roundabout way of admitting you were wrong by moving the goalposts from implying he knew to being ignorant of the meaning.
1