Smazak 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 they/them
@smazak.bsky.social
1.8K followers 2.4K following 5K posts
Biological enby seeking leftist echo chamber and a free palestine. I can't see DMs
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
smazak.bsky.social
I'm now running 3 mod lists if you're interested.

You can report to any of these lists by replying to this post or tagging me under something. Best keep a screenshot in case they block.
3 moderation lists on bluesky:

Maga chancers - for the huge influx of maga chuds in the wake of charlie kirk being dispatched

Charlie Kirk shaggers - people papering over what Kirk was or telling others off for posting facts

Corbyn shaggers - people defending corbyn from accountability to trans people
Reposted by Smazak 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 they/them
smazak.bsky.social
There's an Ann Reardon video where she asks Chat GPT a question, let's it answer, then follows up with "now tell me what was wrong with that answer", and it lists all the lies it just told 🤣
smazak.bsky.social
There's an Ann Reardon video where she asks Chat GPT a question, let's it answer, then follows up with "now tell me what was wrong with that answer", and it lists all the lies it just told 🤣
smazak.bsky.social
Every day I wake up thinking maybe today will be the day we hear from them
stephaniejane.bsky.social
Still waiting for the ‘1,000 families’ that were going to sue the Tavistock.
smazak.bsky.social
I know the chat gpt erotica announcement is getting attention, but the really shitty bit is claiming you've mitigated for mental health when your product convinced a child to hang himself.
ChatGPT Kіlled a Child
YouTube video by Dr. Caelan Conrad
youtu.be
Reposted by Smazak 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 they/them
stephaniejane.bsky.social
But, but, but… Bridget Phillipson said that universities must protect free speech and academic freedom; that they are “non-negotiables”.

Of course, she was only talking about protecting it if the free speech is attacking trans people. 🤷‍♀️
The University of Sussex has been fined £585,000 by the higher education regulator, the Office for Students (OfS), for failing to uphold freedom of speech.
The OfS investigation started with the case of Prof Kathleen Stock, who left the university in 2021 after being accused of transphobia for her views on sex and gender issues.
The OfS said the university's policy statement on trans and non-binary equality, including a requirement to "positively represent trans people", could lead to staff and students preventing themselves from voicing opposing views.
The University of Sussex plans to legally challenge the OfS findings, vice-chancellor Prof Sasha Roseneil said.
Describing the judgement as an "unreasonably absolutist definition of free speech", the university said the ruling would leave institutions "powerless to prevent abusive, bullying and harassing speech".
The OfS, it added, had pursued a "vindictive and unreasonable campaign" against it.
Universities UK, which represents 141 institutions, said it would be writing to the OfS to clarify what would represent a breach of freedom of speech rules.
Chief executive Vivienne Stern said the University of Sussex ruling raised concerns about how universities can balance freedom of speech with other legal duties, like preventing harassment and hate speech.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said free speech and academic freedom were "non-negotiables" in universities.
"I have been clear that where those principles are not upheld, robust action will be taken," she said.
"If you go to university, you must be prepared to have your views challenged, hear contrary opinions and be exposed to uncomfortable truths.
smazak.bsky.social
Heya Jo, can I politely ask that you use alt text to make your images more accessible to the visually impaired?

Cheers :)
smazak.bsky.social
Ok so when you said starmer isn't starving kids because parents are responsible, you were in fact just saying that starmer isn't starving *some* kids. Correct?
smazak.bsky.social
You said that the politicians running the cap aren't starving anyone.
matt600000.bsky.social
He personally starves children does he? Does he go into their houses and take food from their fridges?
smazak.bsky.social
What % of families who can't feed a kid, had that kid knowing they wouldn't be able to feed them?

Just, you never clarified that's the only ones you're talking about, but expected us to just know. So presumably you think it's the vast majority?
smazak.bsky.social
Point to where you clarified you weren't talking about those raped or abused? Which of your posts should Lady Aranea have read to get that nugget of context?
smazak.bsky.social
Soyboy In Chief
paleofuture.bsky.social
“We are considering terminating business with China having to do with Cooking Oil, and other elements of Trade, as retribution.”
Trump: I believe that China purposefully not buying our Soybeans, and causing difficulty for our Soybean Farmers, is an Economically Hostile Act. We are considering terminating business with China having to do with Cooking Oil, and other elements of Trade, as retribution. As an example, we can easily produce Cooking Oil ourselves, we don't need to purchase it from China.
173 ReTruths 753 Likes
10/14/25, 12:37 PM
smazak.bsky.social
I didn't say you're a fan, I just said that in this thread you've been arguing for him.
smazak.bsky.social
Whoever you are arguing for at that moment. In these interactions, Blair and Starmer.
smazak.bsky.social
Starmer kept the policy in place to enable those kids to starve.

Cmon man, your double standard is glaringly obvious. All the good things your guy does are to his credit, all the bad things are not done personally by him so no big.
smazak.bsky.social
Did he personally kill them? Did he go into their homes and start shooting?
smazak.bsky.social
Did Blair personally do all the stuff you credit him with?