Nicholas Lees
@ndmlees.bsky.social
880 followers 130 following 130 posts
Senior Lecturer in International Politics, University of Liverpool. Foreign policy, global inequality, democracy and conflict. https://www.nicholasdmlees.net/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
An absolute classic. I think it's a broader phenomenon: 'We pretend to work and you pretend to pay us' ; 'We pretend to study and you pretend to test us'.
Gambetta & Origgi on the LL Game, in which agents prefer to deliver and receive (!) low quality.

This paper is absolutely savage but also feels uncomfortably relevant to parts of academia outside of Italy 👀

diegogambetta.org/wp-content/u...
Abstract
We investigate a phenomenon which we have experienced as common when dealing
with an assortment of Italian public and private institutions: people promise to exchange
high-quality goods and services, but then something goes wrong and the quality delivered
is lower than had been promised. While this is perceived as ‘cheating’ by outsiders,
insiders seem not only to adapt to, but to rely on this outcome. They do not resent
low-quality exchanges; in fact, they seem to resent high-quality ones, and are inclined
to put pressure on or avoid dealing with agents who deliver high quality. The equilibrium
among low-quality producers relies on an unusual preference ranking which differs from
that associated with the Prisoners’ Dilemma and similar games, whereby self-interested
rational agents prefer to dish out low quality in exchange for high quality. While equally
‘lazy’, agents in our low-quality worlds are oddly ‘pro-social’: for the advantage of
maximizing their raw self-interest, they prefer to receive low-quality goods and services,
provided that they too can in exchange deliver low quality without embarrassment. They
develop a set of oblique social norms to sustain their preferred equilibrium when threatened by the intrusion of high quality. We argue that high-quality collective outcomes are
endangered not only by self-interested individual defectors, but by ‘cartels’ of mutually
satisfied mediocrities.
But, their qualitative investigation raises additional complications! Interviewees report increased tensions within the Group of 77 at the UN and a tendency towards drafting lowest-common-denominator resolutions to maintain unity. It's a really interesting and worthwhile contribution.
They find that South-South solidarity hasn't just persisted in terms of their chosen quantitative measure at the United Nations General Assembly despite the economic development of some Global South states, but that economic development seems to increase a state's alignment with the Global South.
Another great thread from Liam, genuinely very thought provoking.
In my mind Auden, Robert Frost, Rawls, CS Lewis, JRR Tolkien (slight edge case cos he was Catholic) and Mr. Rodgers are all part of the same early-mid 20thC. cultural movement which was trying to synthesise this genteel version of WASP culture, and it didn't quite work so now their hegemony is over.
Great Leeds band. Blackbirds Fall is standout.
Really great thread. Seems to me like some of the 'restrainers' and unilateralists were suffering from what Jon Elster calls the 'younger sibling' fallacy - that others won't react strategically to our own strategic actions.
IR Theory 🧵: One issue I have with unilateralist and restraint approaches to foreign policy is that they assume other countries have no choice but to maintain their policies even the face of US withdrawal from global leadership.

The US can get all the benefits of global leadership without the cost.
We discussed inconsistencies in the foreign policies of all states and within both the N & S, the relationship between historical experiences & contemporary foreign policy positions, the different idioms through which Global South states register dissatisfaction. Thanks all who participated.
Had a great @mybisa.bsky.social panel on foreign policy of Global South states feat Obert Hodzi, Ahmed Umar, Thaís Doria with Meera Sabaratnam as discussant.
Most self-proclaimed 'geopolitics analysts' simply aren't very good at analysing geopolitics. It's usually little more than sports commentary, with a terrible signal to noise ratio.
remember how the Gaza tunnels were an invulnerable fortress into which Hamas would simply retreat? and how Hizbollah would resist the Israeli forces in Lebanon to the death? and how Iranian missiles would wreck Israeli sites? there's been a lot of bad wish casting.
In a week and a day, I'll be presenting findings from my new book The International Relations of the North-South Divide as part of the British International Studies Association conference in Belfast. Looking forward to sharing ideas with others interested in Global South foreign policy.
Book cover for 'The International Relations of the North-South Divide'.
Looking forward to @mybisa.bsky.social - where I'll be discussing 'Southern Strategies: Foreign Policy Perspectives of Global South States' with a great group of panelists. My paper offers a new way of looking at foreign policy differences between Global South states, using cluster analysis.
Reposted by Nicholas Lees
I go into even more depth about North-South relations and how historical inequality shapes foreign policy disagreements in my forthcoming book with Bristol University Press, reviewing theories and offering new quant & mixed method investigations.
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-internat...
The International Relations of the North-South Divide
The International Relations of the North-South Divide - Historical Inequality, Contemporary Disagreement and World Politics; Through a comprehensive and comparative study of data on foreign policy pos...
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk
I have a longstanding interest in the Global South in diplomacy and multilateralism. Here I argue that the Group of 77 within the UN system promotes a ‘South-South ideology’ that shapes voting patterns and the issues states discuss at the General Assembly.
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.cambridge.org
I have a lot of new followers, so I thought I’d introduce myself. I’m Nicholas Lees, Senior Lecturer (Associate Prof) of International Politics at Liverpool University. I mainly research role of material inequalities in shaping diplomatic relations between states. Recent research below.