Max
@maxchch.bsky.social
1.2K followers 1.3K following 2.8K posts
God gets the credit man gets the blame Trump's Big Beautiful Bill will increase the National Debt by 3.5Trillion. That's 1M each day for the next 9000 years He didn't win the WH he was installed Respect Buddhism NZ- where Peter Thiel has bought a passport
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Here's what retired Generals think about Corporal Bone Spurs, who had active US soldiers on their hands and knees rolling out red carpet for a war criminal.

MAGATs: if you want to buy a kidnapped Ukrainian child from Crimea, they're being sold on the internet.
You must be so proud of yourselves
They certainly have a lot in common.
My guess is
- hatred for democracy
- an intense disrespect for people who weren't born with a golden spoon
- a desire to get richer ($billions aren't enough)
- and the power of a malignant narcissist
Yes. Project 2025 (written in 22/23) began when the useful idiot got re-elected. It was so toxic lying Trump denied he knew anything about it.
Then he installed Vance and Vought.
US democracy is being replaced by billionaires who believe it impedes their ability to control everything and everybody
John Bolton's indictment has nothing to do with what you think about him, but everything to do with a president who has weaponized the DoJ.
Bolton's indictment is far bigger than any crimes he may have committed. It's further proof the US is in a dictatorship led by a classified document stealer
Reposted by Max
Once again proving the closest we’ll ever come to justice is his eventual death.
"MAGAt" works for me. They worship him
That's only one picture from my extensive Trump meme library.
If you sit down and put a bucket next to your chair I could show you more - like this:
(we must not forget)
That's only one picture from my extensive Trump meme library.
If you sit down and put a bucket next to your chair I could show you more - like this:
(we must not forget)
Maybe MAGAt Mike would declare the swear-in to be illegal and we would have to wait for Clarence, Alito, and John Roberts to agree. That could take months
The thumbs up works for all occasions
.
The 911 call centers should be flooded with calls the moment masked men get out of unmarked cars
The Qatari pilots need a base in Idaho to train.
I wonder why they couldn't train in the largest US military base in the Middle East - which is in Qatar
There should be a call to 911 every time this sort of thing happens.
Even when masked men get out of unmarked cars - call 911
Having trouble processing facts are you?
You're lucky you don't know how to fact-check because if you did you would be amazed at what Fox has kept from you.
.
Go shoot an elephant plonker - it looks like fun.
I wonder if Trump jr. got his rocks off watching it die
Global warming isn't an issue if you are rich enough to insulate yourself from its effects
He may not understand it but he sure as hell knows how to use it
What's legality got to do with it?
He hates the picture because it looks like he wasn't shot in his ear
Reposted by Max
* * * * WOW * * * *
Look what I have found - thanks to your question,
"Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress though the situation is unusual and context-dependent".
.
x.com/i/grok/share...
Can a US federal district or circuit court judge swear in a newly elected member-to-be of Congress, if that person has been certified by their state as the winner of a special election in their congressional district, and yet the speaker of the house will not perform that obligation?
Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress in such a scenario, though the situation is unusual and context-dependent. The U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 3) requires members of Congress to take an oath to support the Constitution, but it does not specify who must administer it. In practice, the Speaker of the House typically administers the oath to new members during a formal swearing-in ceremony after a special election, as outlined in House Rules and 2 U.S.C. § 25. However, if the Speaker refuses or is unable to perform this duty, there is no constitutional or statutory prohibition against another official, such as a federal judge, administering the oath. The key requirement is that the member-elect has been certified by their state as the winner of the special election, as state certification establishes their legal status as the elected representative (2 U.S.C. § 8). Federal judges, as officers authorized to administer oaths under 5 U.S.C. § 2903, can legally perform this function. Historical precedent supports this flexibility: for example, in rare cases, members-elect have been sworn in by local officials or notaries when circumstances prevented the Speaker from doing so, such as during recesses or emergencies. However, the House retains ultimate authority to determine the qualifications of its members (Article I, Section 5, Clause 1). If the Speaker’s refusal reflects a broader dispute within the House (e.g., over the election’s validity or the member’s qualifications), the House could challenge the member’s seating, regardless of who administers the oath. In such cases, the member might be seated provisionally until the House resolves the matter, as seen in historical disputes like the 1969 case of Powell v. McCormack. In summary, a federal judge can swear in the member-elect if the state has certified their election, but the Speaker’s refusal could signal procedural or political complications that the House would need to resolve. If you need further analysis of specific legal precedents or practical implications, let me know!
x.com
* * * * WOW * * * *
Look what I have found - thanks to your question,
"Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress though the situation is unusual and context-dependent".
.
x.com/i/grok/share...
Can a US federal district or circuit court judge swear in a newly elected member-to-be of Congress, if that person has been certified by their state as the winner of a special election in their congressional district, and yet the speaker of the house will not perform that obligation?
Yes, a U.S. federal district or circuit court judge can administer the oath of office to a newly elected member of Congress in such a scenario, though the situation is unusual and context-dependent. The U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Clause 3) requires members of Congress to take an oath to support the Constitution, but it does not specify who must administer it. In practice, the Speaker of the House typically administers the oath to new members during a formal swearing-in ceremony after a special election, as outlined in House Rules and 2 U.S.C. § 25. However, if the Speaker refuses or is unable to perform this duty, there is no constitutional or statutory prohibition against another official, such as a federal judge, administering the oath. The key requirement is that the member-elect has been certified by their state as the winner of the special election, as state certification establishes their legal status as the elected representative (2 U.S.C. § 8). Federal judges, as officers authorized to administer oaths under 5 U.S.C. § 2903, can legally perform this function. Historical precedent supports this flexibility: for example, in rare cases, members-elect have been sworn in by local officials or notaries when circumstances prevented the Speaker from doing so, such as during recesses or emergencies. However, the House retains ultimate authority to determine the qualifications of its members (Article I, Section 5, Clause 1). If the Speaker’s refusal reflects a broader dispute within the House (e.g., over the election’s validity or the member’s qualifications), the House could challenge the member’s seating, regardless of who administers the oath. In such cases, the member might be seated provisionally until the House resolves the matter, as seen in historical disputes like the 1969 case of Powell v. McCormack. In summary, a federal judge can swear in the member-elect if the state has certified their election, but the Speaker’s refusal could signal procedural or political complications that the House would need to resolve. If you need further analysis of specific legal precedents or practical implications, let me know!
x.com
Yep - the price you have to pay to protect a pedophile
To be fair - it's not a bad reason