Marina
@marstrina.bsky.social
1.1K followers 640 following 4.6K posts
I'm sorry to be so difficult, but I'm afraid the truth is that I am.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Marina
There’ll be multiple reasons that the reason WM police have banned Maccabi Tel Aviv fans: some will be political, some will have to do with the bad conduct of fans in the past

What’s also true is claims antisemitism plays no part in the safety threat is for the birds

Many things can be true
The thing about antisemitism is not that it's wrong or immoral (it is). The problem is that unlike other bigotries, it's essentially a conspiracy theory. And if you have a lot of people believing a conspiracy theory, your country is in trouble, because conspiracy theories make people *stupid*.
I can't make my mind up about the ban, but the *need* for a ban really is a national disgrace. If Jews aren't safe in your country, it's getting into a very dark place.
Daily Express: Ban on Israeli fans is ‘a national disgrace’ #TomorrowsPapersToday
100%. That's why all the milk & sugar - Brits drink the darkest, most bitter & least aromatic varieties of tea, & stew it to boot.
As a British person living in Asia I have come to the realisation that whilst British people love tea and drink loads of it we basically know nothing about it and drink the worse stuff. We are like a person who only smokes soapbar thinking they are a guru on cannabis
I can almost feel sorry for Reform cllrs with no experience of local government getting into power & being absolutely certain they can easily find huge cuts to make - for nearly a decade, central government had been making those very cuts without taking responsibility for or even acknowledging them.
What "shrinking the state" really looks like:
Let's take this in: "Funding cuts from 2010 to 2019 were so severe that they left gaps that could not be filled even by five years of above-inflation increases, leaving local authorities increasingly reliant on emergency funding+capable of providing only legally mandated services, the report shows.”
English councils to remain poorer than in 2010 despite funding rise, says report
Exclusive: Impact of austerity cannot be undone by end of parliament despite above-inflation funding, analysis finds
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Marina
Let's take this in: "Funding cuts from 2010 to 2019 were so severe that they left gaps that could not be filled even by five years of above-inflation increases, leaving local authorities increasingly reliant on emergency funding+capable of providing only legally mandated services, the report shows.”
English councils to remain poorer than in 2010 despite funding rise, says report
Exclusive: Impact of austerity cannot be undone by end of parliament despite above-inflation funding, analysis finds
www.theguardian.com
I tend to assume the worst of all men on principle, but then I am a lifelong & committed hag, so!
Yes, that's what we call the squeeze: if someone says they're not sure about Labour, or just DK, we ask them if there is a party they definitely *wouldn't* want to get in. It used to be Lab or Con - the LDs & Gs never made people care enough - but now we also get "Reform", which is interesting.
We so need this in Swindon. Victorian street layouts & 2+ enormous cars per household simply do not mix.
I think everyone is far too obsessed with Labour, & too focused on teh collapse of the Tories (the latter somewhat jutifiably, it's insane), so nobody is paying enough attention to the fact that teh ~30% protest vote that's *always existed* in the UK is what's fragmenting more than anything.
We're not feeling Reform at 22% on the doors, and we do have an election in 2026 (albeit a local) so it's a bit more real to people. There's about 25% DKs, which is again not unusual, but how many of those are shy Reform there's no telling. We're a bellwether seat, so this should be representative.
That's entirely what one would expect this far out from an election. Why on earth would normal people know who they want to vote for without the clarifying reality of needing to choose? It's bonkers that polling isn't a part-time job anymore. They need to go do something else until 2028.
That's a very tactful way of putting it 😆
That's kind of you, thank you - but I think this was never really going to get off th ground.
Then go away and stop replying to me? Or do you just need to have the last word?
If you really want to engage with people you should be able to do more than give them homework in the form of Haaretz links though. That's like trying to explain to someone why the UK vote to exit the EU by sending them links to Guardian Comment if Free columns.
Nope. As James said, one thing about people who are committed to UBI is that they are not, in fact, open to dialogue - only persuasion. That is why you are still talking to me after I rebuffed your opening gambit, & why I see no obligation on my part to offer you a platform for that persuasion.
Is that a demonstration of the thing I was talking about?
The use of the Nazi self-justifying term 'liquidation' is telling, but what really strikes me is that if the analogy were to be taken seriously rather than tendentiously, then Israel's war in Gaza would be akin to *Allied* powers destroying the Warsaw ghetto.
Same as UBI obsessives.
Tell me when you spot it.

"[A]dministrative detention, introduced by British authorities in the 1940s as an emergency regulation to punish Palestinian resistance fighters and Jewish paramilitary organizations."
It's funny how many historically influential women were accused of being frivolous airheads¹ *and* power-hungry manipulators at the same time.

¹ MA never said 'let them eat cake' - it was probably said by Athenaïs de Montespan, & was definitely a witticism, not a clanger.
At her trial, Marie Antoinette was accused of becoming "master over [Louis XVI’s] feeble character," forcing him to "do anything bad," and that he followed her destructive advice to the letter.

Her response: "I never knew him to have that character you are speaking of."
Reposted by Marina