Marc Veldhoen
@marcveld.bsky.social
11K followers 1.3K following 17K posts
Professor of Immunology 🇳🇱 🇬🇧 Lisbon, 🇵🇹 #Immunology Time for Science, not silence https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=7vG1jLIAAAAJ&hl=en https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-9562 threads.net/@marc_veld mastodon.online/@marc_veld
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
marcveld.bsky.social
Service post:
This account is on anti-science, COVID-19 denial, Long COVID denial, etc., blocklists. All fine, but I'm also running an automated block program. Some unblock me only to find they’re already blocked.

A reminder: be cautious with blocklists.

Unlike X, once blocked = blocked.
Postbox filled with mail, and the forbidden sign behind it.
Reposted by Marc Veldhoen
marcveld.bsky.social
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV

How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility

marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
Reposted by Marc Veldhoen
marcveld.bsky.social
Truly bizarre how a bunch of non-specialists club together under the cosplay banner of the WHN, and push out anti-science pulp.

@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.

1/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Step 1: Ask a loaded question in print. @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social

Step 2: Pretend your question was the answer.

Step 3: Call it science, bc "Peer review".

Step4: Spread it as the truth.

But it is anti-Science BS:

Reposted by Marc Veldhoen
marcveld.bsky.social
Antivaxxers are faced with an overwhelming amount of data, evidence, that shows their claims are very wrong. So they have to claim conspiracy and government involvement.

Covid19 doomers are similar. They use the same arguments, can't read papers, cherry-pick, twist data, and
1/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Again: can you provide evidence of those "many"? Or you mean the online loud activists that are now really doing a lot of harm to those with LC?
marcveld.bsky.social
All yes. Also counts for bacteria, parasites and fungi. SARS-COV-2 infection is not higher risk than those we also regularly encounter. If you claim otherwise you need to provide evidence
marcveld.bsky.social
So again, no data. You make claims, using only words there are 1000s of pathogens, that is why we have an immune system. Nothing has changed.
marcveld.bsky.social
So you have none. Yet you pretend you know better than experts, than collective knowledge, than large amount of data?
Anti-science indeed
marcveld.bsky.social
Show the data. You come again with empty words. Belief over data, knowledge and evidence? That is anti-science.
marcveld.bsky.social
The substack will be updated in stages, so do check back.
3/3
marcveld.bsky.social
There is so much nonsense and unsubstantiated claims in this piece in
@ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social, it will take much of my own time to go through it.
I will do it fast, so it may contain mistakes. Please point them out, and I will correct them.

2/3
marcveld.bsky.social
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV

How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility

marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
marcveld.bsky.social
That is a very important question. And, after decades, the answer is unfortunately: we do not know. This is extremely frustrating and leaves the door open to quacks to make outlandish claims. But, it is the truth.
marcveld.bsky.social
With 200 cherry-picked, mostly low-impact papers, general webpages, press releases, and predatory journals, among others, it is a significant task to review all references and demonstrate that they are flawed or misinterpreted.
marcveld.bsky.social
Yes and no. The issue is that you build up immunity to these infections from early life. This protects you fine until old age, when your immune system is getting weaker. If you do not build up immunity, or insufficiently, you can get very ill when you inevitably encounter the pathogen
marcveld.bsky.social
Also not. Symptoms are caused by the inflammatory response. For some this is heavier, some respond differently.
marcveld.bsky.social
Why does @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social, publush anti-scientific papers? This one is trully shameful, scientifically incorrect, not substantiated by primary data, written by a bunch of conspiracy activists.
8/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Secondary effects have reduced in the years after the pandemic, and are now at background levels.
bsky.app/profile/mar...
bsky.app/profile/mar...
bsky.app/profile/mar...
bsky.app/profile/mar...
7/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Enduring Outcomes of COVID-19 Work Absences on the US Labor Market

Much is made of this, the "COVID kills us all" crowd is up in arms agatin. What does the paper actually show?

jamanetwork.com/jour...
1/8
marcveld.bsky.social
These science-undermining papers do everyone a disservice. The content is clearly incorrect, the message is false, but it can cause panic and a high level of concern; those who do suffer from the consequences of SC2 will be taken less and less seriously due to this nonsense.
5/8
marcveld.bsky.social
it is your immune system responding to an invasion with a virus, bacteria, fungus or parasite.

This "narrative review" does not examine anything; it cherry picks, twists and overinterprets things the authors clearly are ill equiped for to understand.
4/8
marcveld.bsky.social
There is no "Tissue reservoir persistence drives long-term damage" after SARS-CoV-2 infection, etc.

The absence of any knowledge by the authors starts with the statement that both SC2 and HIV infections start with cold-like symptoms. Indeed, so do nearly all infections:
3/8
marcveld.bsky.social
The arguments do not hold. SARS-CoV-2 is not a cronic infection, coronaviruses are not retro-, papiloma- or herpes-viruses. SARS-CoV-2 does not result in dysfunction, exhaustion, depletion or damage of "the immune system", this means you do not understand how it works.
2/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Truly bizarre how a bunch of non-specialists club together under the cosplay banner of the WHN, and push out anti-science pulp.

@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.

1/8
marcveld.bsky.social
Part of the earlier outbreak may be mass tourism such as from Australia and New Zealand, which saw a peak of H3N2 Influenza A at the end of their winter. Changes in climate and reduced exposure to this circulating variant are other explanations.
4/4