Linas Vepstas
linas.org
Linas Vepstas
@linas.org
420 followers 170 following 1.7K posts
░A ░G ░I ░in ░B ░I ░O ░
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
I am fascinated by ideas from AGI: a mashup of math, computing, physics, sociology, linguistics, psychology, structuralism and more. I explore these ideas via Atomese, this odd compute system that is part of the OpenCog AtomSpace. Described here: bsky.app/profile/flee...
@linas.org please please make an opencog profile here so you can talk a bit about it and where you are going in the development , looks like you are doing a lot of interesting things there and i bet other people would be as fascinated by it as me :)
From what I can tell, VICE was doing news like this. Exploring the seedy, shady underbelly of work, ranging from dishonorable to criminal. They've got a series of interesting bio interviews on youtube. But also people seemed to hate VICE. Not sure why. Because it was smeared in shit, I suppose?
The story here is that it's not "petabytes"; my phone has maybe 5 or 10GB of photos. The problem is there's no button/menu n the photo app that says "automatically back up linas.org/%22 I would tell my sister to punch that button, if I could, but I can't. So she pays google $20/month for it.
So google has built a walled garden. Not as fortified as Apple's, but still hard to escape from. And, like the Berlin Wall, these are designed to keep people in. Which is (yet another example of) why I call these people "Soviet" instead of "fascist".
This is hard. Here's a mini example. My phone syncs photos to Google Cloud. At home I have 30TB (yes, you read that right) of disk storage. Can I change my phone to sync photos to my home machine? Supposedly. But its so hard & technical to set up I haven't done it (yet). What about my sisters phone?
Well, can we game out a scenario to prevent this? The "terminal" is de facto the phone, and the apps on it. The path for google is easy: provide an LLM SDK that app writers will want to use. The alternative is what? Use same SDK, but attach it to an LLM that is non-hostile?
But the biggest of them all was(is) string theory. When it started it was explosive in popularity. And stayed that way for decades. I mean, I see exactly why. Who doesn't want an excuse to learn knot theory or number theory, and claim "I'm still doing physics, so you can keep me on the payroll"?
But earlier "mini-" fads in particle physics: recall magnetic monopoles? proton decay? SU(5) unification? Met a guy who wrote his PhD on SU(5) and he was kind of oddly pissed when I said out loud "Oh yeah! That's right! I forgot about that one!"
The charmers are in space: the Pioneer anomaly (now settled). The flyby anomalies (not settled, last I looked). The rainbow of MOND stuff, e.g. the large-diameter stellar binaries evidence (against dark matter). the "no dark energy, we just happen to be the edge of a giant void." Wild stuff.
I'm drawn to unexpected results. There are strange resonances in some low-energy nuclear reactions that keep getting tagged with "is this a 5th force?". But there's also: anomalous muon g-2. The off-by-10% proton charge radius. I don't recall the status of those. Stuff keeps popping up.
The number of corners on a typical neural-net hypercube is larger than the number of atoms in the universe. Much larger.
She's drunk as a skunk when she starts texting. My general impression is everyone in or near the White House is knockered out of their gourds on drugs or booze.
The median normie physicist is distributed on the surface of a soap bubble. All of physics has been subject to fashion trends since forever. Everyone wants to think about the fun new thing instead of the impossible old thing that won't crack despite years of work. That's just how it is.
Who are these so-called Dems, and why do they hate us so much?
Day late and a dollar short.
You can't say this, because I imagine a lot of people would get mad at you, if you did. You're a public persona. I am not. So I can say it. But I also imagine this is not news to you. (Oh, I mis-spelled "kompromat". Oops.) bsky.app/profile/lina...
Some decades ago, Trump was flyin to Moscow regularly to get the russian bankers to bail him out of bankruptcy. I imagine there's a metric eff-ton of compromat of Trump doing 13-year-old russsian girls. This shouldn't be some mystery at this point. I think it's pretty clear, by now.
Well, the crazy perks were kind of crazy. There was (is?) this management technique: "let's get them to hang out in the office 16 hours a day" and that works if you've got ping-pong tables and the employees are single. Grad school was definitely like that.
But also I'm a techie; I have mobility. I have more choices than "work in an Amazon warehouse or be unemployed". That kind of lack of choices is at the root of corporate misery. The fact that Bezos wants to create yet more misery is really a big problem.
I also heard a lot of really terrible things about working for Dell. But yet they chug along. Disclaimer: I am not a business analyst.
Well, careful, I guess more than a few Silicon Valley companies managed to scale this past a few hundred employees. Each used different formulas to get there. Didn't always work out. Some of them are hated for a reason. I got to visit Microsoft a fair bit; I have no clue how people could stand it.
I mean, if you're a VC investing money into a startup, *of course* you don't want and office like "The Office". Of course you want "Seal Team A". And if you're ruthless in hiring practice, you might get that. But that doesn't scale pas a few hundred employees. Reversion to the mean.
TV show "The Office" is not inaccurate. It really is kind of like that.
I dunno. I assume so. Culture doesn't change that quick. I think most companies operate this way. Most companies can't afford to piss of their employees, and they know it. What you might be hearing are some very noisy twitter posters and VC's in Silicon Valley who are, uhh, "opinionated".
IBM execs weren't like royalty. And it wasn't about being "benevolent". Lateral movement was relatively easy: if your boss is a fuckup, you could transfer to work for someone else. Some transfers could even be lateral-but-up. Fuckups didn't get to stay in charge. People would leave them.