James D Kightly
banner
jdkightly.bsky.social
James D Kightly
@jdkightly.bsky.social
1.1K followers 910 following 1.3K posts
Does history - not an historian. Does aviation - not a pilot. Writes, reads, learns, communicates. Aviation Cultures Conferences. Interesting in many things. Freelance. No AI. He/him. Aviation content based at: https://vintageaerowriter.wordpress.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I'll be there - after all, I co-organised it. But it you're interested in aviation history, how it's created, researched and examined, the maybe you should be too.

After all we've made it free, online, and accessible, because we think it should be. See you there!
Reminder! Only 2 days to the free online Logbooks & AvDocs.

Did Guy Gibson 'fudge' his logbook? And one of our experts' 'smoking gun' document: "...reminding audiences that you can’t always trust the people you think you should be able to trust."

Join us! -JDK

aviationcultures.org/spotlights/l...
Cleared that up.

Archivists. Be nice, they know where the bodies are buried.
Hoping this helps our colleagues across the industry
Incidentally, the article's from last year...
Not just you, the internet's worse.

NB: You aren't powerless, you can adapt and overcome. Your actions are important. As elsewhere, making thoughtful smart choices is work, but make a crucial difference.

(Bonus dog on the internet New Yorker cartoon too...)

theconversation.com/the-internet...
The internet is worse than it used to be. How did we get here, and can we go back?
In the early days the internet was a free, egalitarian space for anyone to surf. Now, commercial interests rule – but users do still have some control.
theconversation.com
Very proud of what @avculturesconf.bsky.social team have achieved. It's 2 sessions this weekend, but packed in there are world class experts ready to share their expertise AND answer YOUR questions, free.

I can't quite believe what we've got! Full details on the website, shares & visits v welcome!
Engaged in aviation history research? We've got a VERY useful, FREE, online Spotlight this weekend. In-depth WWII British Commonwealth insight in Sess 1, many wider insights inc legal docs & getting your P-51 papers in Tech Order: Sess 2. Join us! -JDK.

Details: aviationcultures.org/spotlights/l...
Well, I’m hanging for the proof of the breadth of BlueSky’s reach when someone pops up and says ‘yes’!
Reposted by James D Kightly
Reposted by James D Kightly
Logbook oddities? We’re interested. What’s the strangest, funniest or most unexpected thing that you’ve found* in an aviation logbook?

We’ll be talking ‘Logbooks & Avdocs’ in our next Spotlight event, free, online, in just over a month. Can you tease us with an odd fact first? -JDK
The ‘dress’ has been worn by almost every surviving Spitfire decades longer than the re-production of two seat conversion revival.

The casual watcher of warbirds is getting a brief intro. Not an accurate history lesson - on multiple counts.
Nice! A Tiger Moth with manners!
There’s a lot of interesting developmental elements to the D-520 story.

But in 1944, they were still using the standard model. And it was not capable as an air superiority fighter by then.
Essentially, yes. Long range over water to return to a MOVED base seemed to justify a dedicated navigator.

(There's also a forgotten belief that bombers were going to be hard to down, and fighters, thus less useful - so adding other roles to fighters didn't seem as a big compromise as it became.)
Monday Movie Magic: "...you're wanted for murder on every front page in America. Don't be so modest."
-
"I told you. It's a nice face."
That level of thinking is next level, literally!

Great model and idea, too.
Ha! *If* I get there (fingers crossed) this will be the largest model I've completed in decades. That said, if you can avoid messing around and/or trying to be clever (like me!) it's a pretty simple kit that mostly looks like it fits well, so there's that...
A bit of progress on #HeaviesGB #histscalemodels Fw 200. ‘Busying up’ the cockpit which, as well as being very empty, bears little resemblance to the real thing. And the seats are nothing like those provided. Meanwhile the mystery boxes and 1:1 screws have come good in V2 of the plan. Details anon.
Reposted by James D Kightly
The three 1/72 Sea Furies are done! A big “Thank You!” to @jdkightly.bsky.social for his generous assistance with decals, without which these would be back in the stash waiting. I still shudder that Airfix released this kit given its limitations, even compared to Hornby Era designs. #histscalemodels
Blocked Tom a while back (on Twitter) as it became increasingly evident No One Was Ever As Right As Tom About Anything.

He also stopped listening a long time ago.

Of the fascism point, the current US is ticks all the criteria of the definition. You know, Tom, FACTS.
Reposted by James D Kightly
The Met Opera’s season ad shows people being transfixed by gorgeous singing in different places in New York. This commenter is very angry: what if the wrong sort of people show up? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Reposted by James D Kightly
Going to be worth your time! @danellin.bsky.social shares great research.
I'm giving a talk "Penguins and Chop Girls: Remembering RAF Bomber Command ground personnel 1939-45" Monday 6th October 2025 at 6.15pm, @uolhumanities.bsky.social Brayford campus (room TBC). #WW2 #History @nmtdambusters.bsky.social cityoflincolnbranchha.wordpress.com/.../branch.../
It was a good airshow! So in my #HeaviesGB #histscalemodels Fw 200 build, I decided the failure of my special bit was just a blip.

In the 'conventional modelling' element of the build, I created an inner frame structure and the inner side of the passenger door. This Fw 200's cabin was stripped out.
The Royal Australian Air Force base, RAAF Point Cook, in Victoria, has a rare (possibly unique) pre-WWII aircraft gun butt building.

The modern image was taken on a base tour while the great period shot shows one of the RAAF's Hawker Demon fighters using it.

Any other pre-WWII aircraft gun butts?
I certainly thought so, and Sree Nair could provide data in terms of relative performance, and what I also think is interesting, it's one of those aspects of history that won't have been documented, and thus easily missed.
Talking to an Indian Air Force historian about their WWII early days, he suggested they achieved a (documented) higher level of aircraft serviceability and performance because they worked harder, smarter and longer to pre-empt British racial judgement. Be twice as good to get the same credit?