Daniel Villarreal
@getvillarreal.bsky.social
660 followers 2.6K following 260 posts
Hybrid queer witch-rad fae satyr 🧚🏽‍♂️🐏 journalist gaymer 🎮 pun-loving wrestler 🤼 psych & film slut + antifa (come & get me, Trump) 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🏴‍☠️🇺🇦🇵🇸🌹☮️♎️☯️👾 Sex work is real work 💃🏽🕺🏽 PDX via TX 🤙🏾🤠 UBI. Now @ LGBTQ Nation (past work @ Vox, Vice, Newsweek, NBCNews, etc). 📝
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
getvillarreal.bsky.social
I totally judge people for their tattoos and other kinks, but I daren’t say it out loud bc #SexPositive but like, ummm… ewwww no 😜
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
getvillarreal.bsky.social
I have a weird thing, that when I take a seat at a restaurant, bar or any room, I wanna sit in a seat that allows me to view the crowd and the door. Safety? Neurosis.
getvillarreal.bsky.social
Whoa! The xylophone! Hurrah to Japanese punk ingenuity 🇯🇵🗾👺🎎
getvillarreal.bsky.social
And it’s in English! 😺 not scary but definitely a stylish and modern take on the gay coded Wilde tale
getvillarreal.bsky.social
Bring her back will eff you up. Barbarian is pretty good. The Italian version of Dorian Gray is neat. The remake of Nightmare on Elm Street has overt chomo vibes. Companion was fun…. Just a few ideas
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
jessdkant.bsky.social
So when I hear of students being encouraged to use GPT in college I don’t hear innovation. I hear cognitive atrophy, the inability to think critically for oneself, and total dependence on vulnerable centralized repositories of data for knowledge without ever understanding how knowledge is generated.
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
zanath.bsky.social
"We took freedom of speech away" should be in every campaign ad moving forward.
atrupar.com
Trump: "We took the freedom of speech away because that's been through the courts and the courts said you have freedom of speech, but what has happened is when they burn a flag it agitates and irritates crowds."
getvillarreal.bsky.social
If you’re wondering why I didn’t respond to your last email apologizing for ending our friendship after years of us not talking, it’s because I still love you very much and am worried about getting pulled back into your maelstrom. 🌊⛈️☔️
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
mns71.bsky.social
What's the point of these hearings when no one is forced to answer questions posed to them, gets away with being obscenely rude & lie like a rug when they do say something w/o being fact-checked and corrected to their faces?!
#Cartoonish
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
annaleen.bsky.social
A lot of the apps on your phone are tracking your physical location and selling that information to other companies. Here's a fantastic explainer from @pcmag.com about 20 of the most common apps that spy on you. Service journalism at its finest. www.pcmag.com/explainers/t...
These 20 Apps Are Watching You—And You Probably Use Them Every Day
You might use these apps every day, but have no idea what they collect. These 20 apps are quietly harvesting your location, contacts, photos, and more—here's what you can do about it.
www.pcmag.com
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Sounds like Republicans ought to get all the Republicans who form the Republican majorities in the Republican-led House and the Republican-led Senate together to pass the budget that Republicans wrote with the Republican White House and that Republicans now insist absolutely must be passed.
atrupar.com
Sean Duffy says the safety of the air traffic control system will start being impacted next Sunday if the shutdown continues
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
kojamf.bsky.social
Dr. Jane Goodall filmed an interview with Netflix in March 2025 that she understood would only be released after her death.
getvillarreal.bsky.social
The body is a gateway to the mind is a gateway to the body. I will worship at the altar of physical beauty, which is internal as well as external, so I may know myself, my sensuality, and my capability more fully. This is part of Lady Aphrodite’s message to me.
A statuette of Aphrodite shows her clothed, rising from a clam shell, her hands in her hair as a dolphin adores her from the water at her feet
getvillarreal.bsky.social
Making peace
with my body 🧘🏽‍♂️
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
Justice Jackson is obviously correct. SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE are now illegally going to have their status terminated early — as every court other than the Supreme Court has found so far.

Not a single word of justification from the Justices in the majority to justify this. NONE. Not one.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Sotomayor and Kagan would deny the application.

Jackson, alone, writes, accusing the majority of "privileging the bald assertion of unconstrained executive power over countless families’ pleas for the stability our Government has promised them."
Our lower court colleagues have already chosen the obvi-ous—i.e., least disruptive and most humane-answer to that question.? So, this stay application presents us with an antecedent decision: whether the Government's interest in terminating TPS right now is so urgent that this Court, rather than the able judges currently exercising jurisdiction over the matter, should be the one to decide those individuals' interim fate. See Noem v. Doe, 605 U.S. .
(2025) (JACKSON, J., dissenting from grant of application for stay) (slip op., at 7-8); see also Magnum Import Co. v.
Coty, 262 U. S. 159, 164 (1923) (explaining that "this Court requires an extraordinary showing" before it will override the stay decision of a lower court, rendered "with a much fuller knowledge [of the case] than we can have"). Only if the Government demonstrates such a time-sensitive need should we even consider vetoing the lower courts' unanimous judgment about the most equitable interim status.
The Government has made no such showing. Yet, for the second time in this same case, the Court grants it the JACKSON, J., dissenting
extraordinary relief it seeks. We once again eschew re-straint—ignoring the need for exigency or any other prudent threshold limitation on the exercise of our discretion— and wordlessly override the considered judgments of our colleagues. We once again use our equitable power (but not our opinion-writing capacity) to allow this Administration to disrupt as many lives as possible, as quickly as possible.
I view today's decision as yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket. This Court should have stayed its hand.
Having opted instead to join the fray, the Court plainly misjudges the irreparable harm and balance-of-the-equities factors by privileging the bald assertion of unconstrained executive power over countless families' pleas for the stability our Government has promised them. Because, re-spectfully, I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent.
Reposted by Daniel Villarreal
bencollins.bsky.social
I am just so fucking proud of her.
getvillarreal.bsky.social
@clarkrogers.bsky.social he’s back… same screen name as you said