FPL Historian
banner
fplhistorian.bsky.social
FPL Historian
@fplhistorian.bsky.social
620 followers 350 following 600 posts
OR 23/24 17k
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I think not having BB to deal with on WC is big, as it means both putting more money on the pitch but also using fewer transfers.
I think that will probably be the case, but it will be hard to go into team styles when games are so variable. ‘X team delivers crosses and long throws, but had a man sent off when Y player faced them’, and that sort of thing. More generally, two more games will be 25% more info which is huge.
My conclusion is that if I were predicting over the medium-term, it would be no surprise to see any of these (bar Senesi) get 5-6 returns in an 8 game stretch. Whereas players like Lacroix and Alderete are on a median of 9.5 suggesting consistent returns of around 1 in 2.
4) Richards - 5/8 returns, median of 11.5. Also some very big numbers, and should sustain this rate.

5) Andersen - 6/7 returns (Starts only), median of 11 per start. Like Tarko, a few returns in the 10-11 range, suggesting it's likely that there will be a few more near-misses in the future.
3) Tarko - 7/8 returns, median of 11. Many returns are in the 10-11 range, so I suspect we'll see a few more near-misses than we have so far, perhaps some regression to Virgil-esque levels of returns. (Last year he hit returns of 2 in 3 from a median of 10).
1) Senesi - 7/8 returns, median of 14. This feels very highly predictive and suggests that this sort of hit rate may well sustainable.

2) Virgil - 5/8 returns, median of 11. Massive numbers hit in some games, missing out on others. I think, again, this is a sustainable rate of return.
What's the most useful metric for thinking about Defcon returns? Percentage of returns? Total DCs piled up? minutes per DC? I've had a quick look at the top 5 for minutes per DC, and looked at their Median DC average....
Just go with GW9 if the players are fit - who knows what it will happen
True, but it means the player pool is pretty small…
The expansion of European football plus the five subs rule really does ruin FPL. How many legitimate attacking picks, in xMins terms, are there from the six UCL teams?
The bad place totally losing its shit over the non-assist for Semenyo.
1) it’s not an assist according to the new rules as although inadvertant touches count, they don’t if a defender subsequently touches the ball;
2) imagine being that angry about 3 more points for a 90+% EO player.
Also, it’s fair to say that I’m a very pessimistic fan 😂
That’s fair enough! And if he could get you a price rise or two.
Original plan for King to either Sarr/Paqueta/Minteh and BB8, but the Caicedo flag is worrying me. Should I just roll and wait for another week for BB? That said, in the long term I think all three of the above are good picks
As a West Ham who had Diouf from the start I wouldn’t touch him until we see if Nuno can turn it around.
Reposted by FPL Historian
Fish and Chip shops that use spray bottles for vinegar should be shut down.
Cheers - and there is a sense that I will want to move a very cheap striker/mid at some point
I’m weighing up whether to trust Caicedo starts and use mine as well, as planned….
I really appreciate this, Jonny!
Would you BB this week with Caicedo and hope he starts, or hold fire?
I’m weighing up King to Paqueta and BB’ing this week. Also, I’m going to the West Ham-Brentford game so having a player is always nice.
Still having my BB feels like a massive fucking millstone. My feeling is that although GW11 looks better here, use it as early as possible as who knows what injuries will happen? Also, I can't wait to bin one of my strikers for a 4.5 dud.
But if Kudus doesn’t deliver straight away you might be itching to move him for his tricky run away. So I’d say get Eze or go for someone who you know you’ll be happy to hold for a while…