Author | Lightnews

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 6h

Unarmed ≠ Not a threat.
Rosenbaum & Huber attempted to disarm Kyle.
The term "unarmed" becomes irrelevant when that person is attempting to DISARM you.
Huber was utilizing his skateboard as a blunt force object.
Grosskreutz pointed a firearm at Kyle's head.

Context matters.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 7h

I'll admit that your original statement lacked context as usual.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

It's restricted and generally requires a specific permit.
You claimed that every household has an automatic weapon. That's simply not true.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

Stop making false claims & I won't correct you. 😂

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

"seeing a guy with a full auto rifle over his shoulder in a grocery store is common in Switzerland"

Both are highly restricted and generally require a specific permit. It's not common.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

Rittenhouse was responsible. His trigger discipline & threat assessment were flawless.
He only neutralized those who attacked him first.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

"Most Swiss ppl have a full auto rifle in their house."

That's interesting considering they're outlawed.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

Your posts show otherwise.

2

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 8h

Despite his denial, he doesn't approve of firearms or self-defense.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Agreed. Irrelevant to the conversation.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Yet, you're condoning the unprovoked attack on Rittenhouse by Rosenbaum in his attempt to disarm him.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Then why post an irrelevant scenario? 😂

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

I've heard you. You despise firearms & encourage people to disarm those who are armed.

I'm basing my opinions on facts. You're basing yours on feelings & emotions.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Thanks for admitting that your example was irrelevant to the Rittenhouse situation.

Simply being armed in an open carry state amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed is NOT justification to disarm that person. Your views on firearms/open carry are not allowing you to remain impartial.

1 1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

If the sight of a firearm triggers a person to carry out an unprovoked attack on someone that's their problem.
It's certainly not what a reasonable person would do.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Your opinions regarding open carry are in direct conflict with the open carry laws in WI.
Rosenbaum, the catalyst, was clearly looking for trouble but you're choosing to ignore it.

The self-defense laws in Japan share the same standards/principles as the US.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Your example was a false equivalence.

You're placing all the blame on Rittenhouse when the evidence clearly proved that Rosenbaum, Huber & Grosskreutz carried out an unprovoked attack on Kyle who was clearly armed.
Legal self-defense.

1 1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 9h

Nice try but that doesn't invalidate my previous post.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 10h

"looking for trouble"

Ironically, you just described Joseph Rosenbaum. Not Rittenhouse.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 10h

"looking for trouble"

Why did he run from every encounter?

There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.

That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 10h

"no business being in Kenosha"

Says who, you? 🤣😂

Despite YOUR ignorance, Kyle had every right to be there, armed, just like everyone else.

Once YOU accept that reality is the moment YOU become less ignorant.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 15h

Rittenhouse?

What do you have against a clear case of self-defense?

Either you believe in self-defense or not.

Rittenhouse:
-Justifiably defended himself against unprovoked attacks.
-All supported by witness testimony & video evidence.
-No law(s) were violated.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 15h

Your entire scenario is a false equivalence to what occurred in the Rittenhouse incident.

1 1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 15h

The open carry laws in WI are in direct conflict with your opinion. Considering WI is an open carry state & 100's of people were similarly armed invalidates your claim.
There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed.

1 2