Emily Grubert
banner
gruberte.bsky.social
Emily Grubert
@gruberte.bsky.social

civil engineer / environmental sociologist. energy, water, climate, buildings, justice. fossil phaseout / universal programs. she / her. bunnies.

Environmental science 38%
Engineering 24%

I feel like every article I read about Trump admin energy policy lately is like “on the one hand, actual people are horrified and suffering. On the other hand, a literal lump of coal called this a ‘good move.’”

Sure words evolve, but this particular terminology has tended to exalt the US political system as the way to be “good,” so shedding the positive label when the underlying thing produces bad outcomes and pinning those outcomes on someone else isn’t great

I’m not lolol (I was actually hate-rooting for Miami out of ND loyalty here) but I still think it was BS!

We are all aboard the Indiana train now toot toot

Another slightly less meaningless thing I’m mad about is referring to the US as “third world.” third world doesnt mean poor and shitty! It means unaligned with US or Soviet powers!! This is what “first world” politics has produced!!!

Reposted by Emily Grubert

I know refs treat Hail Marys differently but this really does seem like pass interference.
Replays in the end zone from the final play

Ok this is so far down the list of important but it upsets me that I literally can’t find any evidence that Carson Beck (who graduated from UGA!!! But is a redshirt senior at miami!!!) is a degree-seeking student

This reminds me of the "kick this soccer ball around to generate power in poor places" type thing -- the attitude that this is charity and people should take what they can get (that happens to be my zany idea)

Reposted by Emily Grubert

Carbon markets have no future in a (net) zero-emissions world

New article in @dialoguescc.bsky.social by @gruberte.bsky.social journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

Ok but at this point it just feels targeted

Reposted by Emily Grubert

It has been a truly upsetting revelation how many people who I thought cared about disinformation, advocating for science, etc just flipped in 0.002 microseconds after a tech company programmed a chatbot to tell them how great their questions are

“Things I’ve known but haven’t previously seen a bunch of philosophers fight about” for 200, Alex

I think the greatest gift that being part of our Ethics Initiative this year has given me is the scholarly framework to talk about how failing to phase out fossil fuels is ethically wrong. We can talk feasibility til our ears bleed but there’s an obvious moral aspect that doesn’t need cost analyses

I do think the “meet people where they’re at” advice has been twisted into “people are stupid” in a lot of political settings and it’s just…not true?
I think that advice is extremely short-sighted. Try harnessing anger at fossil billionaires after collaborating with and enabling them. Try telling people you'll protect public health after supporting policies that let fossil fuel companies poison the air and water in disadvantaged communities.

Reposted by Emily Grubert

I think that advice is extremely short-sighted. Try harnessing anger at fossil billionaires after collaborating with and enabling them. Try telling people you'll protect public health after supporting policies that let fossil fuel companies poison the air and water in disadvantaged communities.

This is an extremely based cold calling approach, incredible

I also love that one could check the SSA data for the year the students were born to tailor it

That’s a neat idea — basically a bracket that would let you pass the linesets through the window?

Intriguing! Still need to be able to access an outdoor horizontal surface for this one though, right?

Acknowledging my gradient was cheap ($2k) it remains a very neat solution for my weird use case. Glad to see more options for more use cases!

Reposted by Emily Grubert

Larger point: 45Q is arguably the most perverse energy subsidy from a climate pespective. Govt paying corporations to capture and store CO2, instead of actually reducing emissions, means incentivizing more extraction and combustion of fossil fuels because more emissions means more public $.

Honestly facts

I was thinking more popular media on that front but yes lol

The “AI will revolutionize academia because it can summarize articles” argument is so funny because this is what an abstract is for??

What it is good at is circumventing paywalls

Reposted by Emily Grubert

If you are working towards a vision of shared prosperity in a clean energy future and your principal adversaries are unions, environmentalists, and community-based justice orgs, consider if just maybe it might be possible that you haven't unlocked secret knowledge they are all too dumb to understand
2. What he says about climate is patently false (more on that later) but to the extent he's saying "politicians shouldn't do the right thing unless it's popular", I'd note only that that is a toddlers view of leadership. If the popular kids are mean, should you be mean?
“The mind-set shift needed here is to acknowledge that while climate change is real and harmful, the utility of fossil fuels is not something the oil and gas industry tricked the public into,” Matthew Yglesias writes.
Opinion | Obama Supported It. The Left in Canada and Norway Do. Why Don’t Democrats?
Liberals should reconcile with America’s oil and gas industry.
nyti.ms

But markets!!!

(All this is making my survey of people who live by many of the plants affected by this trend into more of an experiment than I’d expected…)
States' rights? States are in charge of deciding what power plants we have on the grid - until the GOP in Congress decides they're not. All to prop up the losing hand of coal.
E&E News: House approves bill to keep coal plants on the grid
The legislation would give federal regulators new authority to delay power plant retirements in the name of grid reliability.
subscriber.politicopro.com

Reposted by Emily Grubert

States' rights? States are in charge of deciding what power plants we have on the grid - until the GOP in Congress decides they're not. All to prop up the losing hand of coal.
E&E News: House approves bill to keep coal plants on the grid
The legislation would give federal regulators new authority to delay power plant retirements in the name of grid reliability.
subscriber.politicopro.com

and notably this is not the same argument as "carbon taxes are regressive," which is also true but easier to design away

i'm regularly surprised by the pushback i get on the idea that a carbon tax isn't useful for full decarbonization. like it seems on its face obvious that taxes become less effective at changing behavior as wealth gets bigger, so you push out non-luxury stuff way before luxury stuff.

it's not actually funny but it's kind of funny that I wrote a thing for my school paper (if I remember correctly) about larry summers being shitty...

... WHEN I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL

None of this was unclear! Social media didn't even exist, I wasn't a radio person, and I *still* knew that!!

No love lost for Nature as a publisher (independent of this work) but omg how is this not in Nature Italy (yes that’s a thing)