Daniel Dvorkin
banner
danielmedic.bsky.social
Daniel Dvorkin
@danielmedic.bsky.social
5.8K followers 510 following 1.7K posts
Bioinformaticist / biostatistician, veteran USAF medic and Army infantryman, armchair paleontologist, occasional science fiction author, long-ago kickboxer, oldbat goth, vaccinated liberal patriot.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I like lists. Checking off ... items ... is deeply satisfying.
Nobody deserves to die of an easily preventable disease. If anyone did, though, the people pushing this insanity would be at the top of the list.
I laughed. But more and more people believe this dangerous nonsense. Our ability to prevent and treat disease is under full-scale attack, and millions—tens or hundreds of millions—will die because of it. 🧪 ⚕️
Checklist time!

Good food: France ✅ Olympus Mons ❌
Good beer: France ❌ Olympus Mons ❌
The Louvre: France ✅ (kind of) Olympus Mons ❌
High peaks: France ✅ Olympus Mons ✅
Highest peak in Solar System: France ❌ Olympus Mons ✅
Cool fossils: France ✅ Olympus Mons ❌ (probably)

Hard decision, really.
Gee, Bernie, how many tours did you serve?
Oh, I'm sure it's licensed meth. They're *professionals*.
I think my direct deposit paperwork got screwed up.
Could be. Mostly I'm seeing it presented as a parable about how foolish we are to think we can control nature. Which is indeed foolish, but this isn't really an example of that.
Imagine thinking that sumd00d calling himself Bronze Age Pervert will ever have anything worthwhile to say, on any subject.
Imagine thinking that the triumph of the city, an ideal habitat for modern humans, is a bad thing.
“A good Bronze Age Pervert tweet..”-Ross Douthat, NYT’s resident intellectual conservative
Imagine thinking that sumd00d calling himself Bronze Age Pervert will ever have anything worthwhile to say, on any subject.
I love how when you open the listing, the description ends with, "Listing broker will arrange with city for licensed meth".
The HOA board is notoriously unresponsive to resident concerns.
STG. He was super-enthusiastic and really couldn't understand why I didn't jump at the chance to get in on this exciting business opportunity.

We were standing right next to the grill, and I think he had no idea how close I came to grabbing his head and pushing his face down on it.
[climbs out of acid bath] You mean I've been doing this wrong the whole time?
This reminds me of the guy I met at a party years ago who, upon learning I was a web developer, wanted to hire me to get around spam blockers so he could advertise his Brazilian sex-tour business.
"Making fun of #antivaxers isn't the best way to educate them."

"It is very difficult to educate mass murderers as to why mass murder is bad."

🧪 ⚕️
So I stand by my statement: climatologists, for as long as that job has existed, have never had a consensus prediction of cooling. Warming, though, they picked up on quite early.
That's interesting, and thanks for the link. But as the paper says, climatology as a field only goes back to the mid-19th century—by which time the Industrial Revolution was well underway, and establishing the link between CO2 and heat retention was a major step in its development.
If there's something here I'm missing, I'd appreciate you pointing it out. Otherwise you're just, you know, blowing hot air.
Climatologists generally agree that we *would* be in a cooling phase absent GHG emissions, but since we're happily pumping out CO2 and other GHGs, that's not what they're *predicting*. This has been the case ever since climatology existed as a field of study.
It looks to me like you're saying there was a time that climatologists *did* predict cooling instead of warming. And I'm saying there was no such time.