Damned Atheist
@damnedatheist.bsky.social
260 followers 170 following 3K posts
Heaven is full of paedophiles, rapists, and murderers. I think I’ll just go to hell.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Damned Atheist
Vegans ❤️ the people who produce healthful plant based foods 🌱
We don’t approve of the exploitation of animals who have been so cruelly diminished as livestock.
A grid of nine squares, with the outer squares showing various plant based foods, each containing a word from the sentence: Thank you for producing the food we eat; the centre Square Has a picture of a livestock farmer, standing in front of cows with the words: fuck off
I‘ve always loved this image 😂
You’re right, and farmers, unlike the majority of people who try to pretend they don’t, are quite open about feeding them silage…for example

m.youtube.com/watch?v=92Xi...
Feeding Grass Silage - Want 50kg more winter weight gain for no extra cost? - Virtual Beef Week
YouTube video by Teagasc
m.youtube.com
Right…so silage, just like this.
It’s probably a Mitloehner misinformation bot.
It’s attempted misdirection because their current line is failing.

The fact is that farmers farm for profit, not out of a sense of moral empathy…and this fool made it abundantly clear that I wasn’t wrong. Now they’re trying to shift away from it.
I prefer to let you know that while you happily exacerbate climate change, I’ll be doing the same in my own way.

The beauty is that, the excuses you use to “justify“ your continued emissions, are really easy to use to convince others to continue fossil fuel use…I know this first hand.
Because as you already made clear, they’re not held accountable for their actions; which is one of the prerequisites for moral agency.

In much the same way you would be held accountable for killing an infant, but bears are not. Not by us and not by them.
Oh do me a favour twatface. Are you a Mitloehner bot?

Stick to the facts…animal farmers are not in it because they somehow “care“ about their victims, the exploit animals purely for profit.
You’re not a bear AND bears are not moral agents. Since you’d brought up morality, you must believe that humans are
Ah right, so if you desire something from exploiting a victim, then you think i’s morally acceptable…

So if a rapist desires sexual exploitation of their victims, you believe it’s morally acceptable?
No they don’t, they care about profit. You’re literally making that case right now.

No one can claim they have someone’s wellbeing in mind, when their ONLY objective is their exploitation. It’s like a sex trafficker saying they care about the welfare of their victims because they don’t cage them.
You’re 100% correct, it is a marketing strategy. The term means nothing. Those dairy farmers, for example, can happily use the “grass fed” label. The cows might never see the outside of a barn or paddock, but they’re still fed grass.

It‘s marketing bullshit that’s proven lucrative for farmers
Of course you will. The label is a bullshit ploy to try to convince consumers that their choices are morally acceptable, that’s it, nothing more.

If farmers can legally slap on a term that increases their profits, they ABSOLUTELY will. You’d be naive not to believe that.
Exactly. The whole “grass fed” bullshit agenda is just a smokescreen to allow farmers to maintain the status quo.

People seem to honestly think cows stand around in green pasture all year round.
I honestly wouldn‘t be surprised if some people thought tha 😂
True!

And the idea that the same people who are happy to support the bullshit “grass fed”, i.e. standard industry agenda, won’t also be consuming dairy cows or dairy, is hilariously ignorant.
You expect everyone to fall in line with your preferred way of emitting, sort of like an eco-fascist, if you will.

So, tell you what, you let us emit the way we want to and you can emit the way you want to, without judgment, deal?
Yes you’re 100% a hypocrite, because the food you choose to consume has a much higher impact on the climate and environment than alternatives.

Much the same way that my fossil fuel consumption has a higher impact than electric…but I don’t bang on about climate change, you do
Who the hell are you to moan about climate change?!?

How about you let those of us who prefer to burn fossil fuel, emit our way for our pleasure, whilst you emit your way for your pleasure, you absolute hypocrite.
It’s a “crisis” you’re happy to cause. You climate moaners are all the same, expecting everyone else to eliminate their impact, while you exacerbate the problem for your own pleasure.

I’m happy to tell you hypocrites off, while I burn fossil fuel for my pleasure.
You’re like a smoker complaining about lung cancer...
What are they fed in winter then?
You’re not so stupid that you think dairy cows aren’t eaten, are you?

Do you think that ONLY dairy cows are given silage?!?
Reposted by Damned Atheist
The deep irony of people using Orwell’s Animal Farm to understand totalitarianism without even a glimmer of recognition of our brutal totalitarianism towards actual non-human animals.