Allan Faulds
@afaulds.bsky.social
1.2K followers 94 following 3.2K posts
Hello I used to Tweet but now I only tweet Massive poofter, mostly gayposting in response to a society that has gotten high on its own supply of howfin queerphobia
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
afaulds.bsky.social
Where treaties (not just CEDAW but also CRPD and CERD) exist that have a specific group focus, that focus is not to grant additional, special rights to those groups that others are not granted, but to recognise the specific need to address barriers to rights realisation that others do not face
afaulds.bsky.social
Whatever the rest of that MP's thread says is immaterial, it falls at that first hurdle because she evidently does not know the first thing about human rights!

The fundamental principle of human rights is they are universal! No group has more or fewer rights than another!
afaulds.bsky.social
There are no obligations under CEDAW to uphold "sex-based rights" as international human rights law does not include the concept of "sex-based rights" and indeed that concept is incompatible with the principles of human rights which are afforded to everyone on the basis of being human
jordanpfot.bsky.social
I agree that human rights cannot be applied selectively! This is why it was curious, to say the least, that the Supreme Court opted not to consider human rights at all in their judgment.
afaulds.bsky.social
Obviously, the time it'll take to get to the ECtHR is a pain, the ongoing risk to the UK's continued adherence to the ECHR itself is serious, things are shit and getting worse in the interim, but genuinely, there's hope here: the UK is so obviously in breach of human rights that it will not stand.
afaulds.bsky.social
Said it before and saying it again but there's no way the Supreme Court's anti-trans ruling survives contact with European/International human rights law, and here's yet another example of an actual human rights expert/body effectively setting the stage for that.

rm.coe.int/letter-to-pa...
rm.coe.int
afaulds.bsky.social
Mfer said "Liz Truzz"

Anyway what a perfect way to turn a good point - "SNP leadership turnover was chaotic and a bad sign for them" - into a reminder of how unfit you are for the job you have - "wow 3 leaders in 14 months! That's worse than the Tories who had, um, 3 in 3 months!"
afaulds.bsky.social
Gods Chris Mason really is just Not Good At This, is he. Chris, petal, if you have one Boris Johnson, one Liz Truzz, and one Rishi Sunak, how many Conservative Prime Ministers do you have? And if Johnson is August, Truss is September, and Sunak is October, how many months is that?
afaulds.bsky.social
Also the Lib Dems winning the Inverness inclusive Westminster seat is almost certainly down to the inclusion of large parts of what was once Kennedy Land; the Holyrood seat is much more Inverness and the rural bit is Nairn, not Kennedy Land!
afaulds.bsky.social
Yes, to be clear in this case I am throwing models out the window and just working on basis such as "look the Tories still won the Borders seat by 15% last year, no chance the Nats get it at Holyrood" and "the Lib Dems are the only established party clearly on the up and have CSR in the bag"
afaulds.bsky.social
I'm basically discounting list seats as an at all possible contributor to a majority: unless the SNP *beat their 2021 performance* they will not be proportionally due list seats *except* if they lose so many constituencies in a given region as to, in itself, make a majority impossible
afaulds.bsky.social
I was giving my boss this spiel on the bus back from SNP conference earlier, I'm very practiced at it today
afaulds.bsky.social
So they cannot afford to lose a single constituency beyond that. The new EdN? Lib Dems very good shot at winning. East Lothian? SNP so marginal over Labour in 2021 that even at this point a Labour win likely. Even Dumfriesshire, very unlikely to go SNP! In other words, I think they cap out circa 62.
afaulds.bsky.social
So to disagree with Mark slightly here I don't believe a majority is on the cards; the SNP can afford to not win 8 of the 73 constituencies.

The 4 LD ones? They'll hold. They'll also gain CSR. The 2 Lab ones? They've held so far and will again now. From Con? SNP are not winning ERB. That's the 8.
markmcgeoghegan.bsky.social
Something that's gone under the radar ahead of the 2026 Holyrood elections is the % of voters who are undecided, & who they are.

Around an eighth of likely voters don't know who they'd vote for. Over half of those voted SNP in 2021. If they go back to the SNP, a majority isn't off the cards.
afaulds.bsky.social
We had an hour between leaving SNP conference and getting the train back so I made my colleagues walk around Aberdeen city centre and ooh at things (my boss is actually from here so it wasn't like it was new to her!)
afaulds.bsky.social
Aberdeen: very grey, still, who knew
afaulds.bsky.social
Ha ha imagine Scotrail could run trains on time! Imagine! Imagine it ran basic suburban services in a timely manner so you could make your intercity trains! Lol. Lmao.
afaulds.bsky.social
Yes, and that was just with them being entitled, not being entitled *and* spending up to five years spitting in people's faces then expecting their vote as if the Greens and Lib Dems won't be an attractive alternative.
afaulds.bsky.social
Hello! Hello! Scotland calling! Are you aware of us? Have you ever paid any actual attention to us? Can I introduce you to Scottish Labour's 2011 campaign? A campaign that simply assumed their core voters would "come home to Labour?" Did you see 2015? Taking your core for granted can be fatal!
afaulds.bsky.social
I think "we need to be cautious about polling this far from the next UK election" is a reasonable warning; the number of centre-to-centre-right morons pairing it with "voters on the left will of course return to Labour if it's them or Reform" is absolutely flabbergasting.
afaulds.bsky.social
Am I generalising about takes I have somehow seen on the same day on this website? Yes, but also, when I use the term Yanks it is very much not intended to mean "any resident or citizen of the US" but instead "complete rockets who need to be put behind a Great Firewall for their own sake"
afaulds.bsky.social
Wasn't a fan of when he did the whole supernatural evil castle takeover thing mind you
afaulds.bsky.social
Smol bean people you started with 13 Colonies and ended with 50 States plus a bunch of far flung territories: you are as genocidal and imperialistic as the Euros

The US is evil people, us Euros spent hundreds of years perfecting antisemitism and xenophobia: I can assure you Nazism was not from you
afaulds.bsky.social
Yanks on Bluesky really need to find their Goldilocks point, so often you get takes that are either "poor us we are just smol bean oppressed former colony not like mighty Britain uwu" or, the other extreme, "we are the most evil state that ever existed and all evil since circa 1900 is rooted in us"
afaulds.bsky.social
(Risk for them in two directions; A, SNP never get a majority again, even an earned one, but have delegitimised Greens as contributing to justifying an IndyRef; B, winning an unearned majority on a Starmer-level fragile FPTP vote share means starting any IndyRef with fatally low political capital)