Scholar

Patrick O’Brien

Patrick John (Paddy) O'Brien, was an Australian political scientist and author, teaching in the political science department of the… more

H-index: 22
Economics 36%
Political science 31%
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
People who do Park Run, what’s the obsession with doing it on Saturday at 9am? Who hurt you? Is it something in your childhood?
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Of course! Might as well cut out the middle-man...
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Yes. I think this is much more careful and insightful than the original speech deserves, though. Really, I think the message is "I want to be allowed to appoint Ekins and that guy who says he does law not politics to the UKSC".
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Yes absolutely. I debated whether I should include a caveat like this in the original post. There were all sorts of unpalatable things about early 20th C LC decisions (eg religious quotas). But notwithstanding: in the modern era, there was never an LC that operated in the way he's suggesting.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Yes, entirely true. It's not really possible to put the old LC back together again without dealing with all these very complex outworkings from later evolution of the system.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
There may, in abstract, be an argument for greater political interest and input in judicial appointments as a means of enhancing trust. That this now invariably comes wrapped with a threat to appoint friends and dismiss enemies, however, shows the wisdom of removing politicians from these decisions.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
As with so much of the contemporary critique of the legal constitution, this golden age myth ignores the fact that politicians were subject to - and observed - conventions that controlled how they used their powers, including conventions about independence and political neutrality.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Obviously, this speech is crassly offensive in multiple ways, and does violence to judicial independence. But I think it's also important to recognise that there was never a 'golden age' when Lord Chancellors just appointed and sacked whoever they wanted as judges. This is an authoritarian fantasy.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Just because you give it to us straight, irascible but loveable Public Law journal account. It's a compliment...
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
(Because this is BlueSky I should probably make it clear that that was a joke.)
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
I think you're doing voter corruption the wrong way round...?
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
I think people who assume Gavin won't now get votes haven't spent enough time engaging with student politics and the popularity of RON (re-open nominations).
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Banter heuristic says Jim Gavin now wins the Irish presidential election as the Re-Open Nominations candidate.
patrickcobrien.bsky.social
Just in case Red Bull are reading, I'm willing to be fired from Red Bull for a 10% discount on whatever you're willing to be fired for. Not here to make friends.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 4m