Reposted by John C. Besley
Our guest raised (at least) as many interesting questions as he answered ❔ Thank you, @johnbesley.bsky.social, for your visit. We learned that scientists should clearly state why they conduct their research & how society can benefit from it. Until next time! 🔜
#sciencecommunication #trustworthiness
#sciencecommunication #trustworthiness
Thank you for the opportunity to visit. I really enjoyed the time spent chatting about trust and trustworthiness with your excellent team.
Reposted by John C. Besley
Scientific information does not flow into policy the way most scientists think. Twenty years after her jarring first day as a fisheries-biologist-turned-Senate-staffer, @sheril.bsky.social lays out what every scientist hoping to influence policy on the Hill needs to know: issues.org/information-...
by Mike S. Schäfer — Reposted by John C. Besley
📢 Looking for #postdoc researcher on #sciencecommunication
➡️ researching communicators and/or effects
➡️ quantitative methods, e.g. surveys or experiments
➡️ 3-year position, can likely be extended
➡️ Deadline & more: see below
It this appeals to you - do apply!
If not: Pls pass it on! 🙏
➡️ researching communicators and/or effects
➡️ quantitative methods, e.g. surveys or experiments
➡️ 3-year position, can likely be extended
➡️ Deadline & more: see below
It this appeals to you - do apply!
If not: Pls pass it on! 🙏
Why is it an either/or framing? Why alienate golfers? Land is not scarce in the US (or UK?). There’s plenty of room for both and I worry this kind of framing exacerbates polarization (i.e., stirs up a fight that doesn’t need to be fought).