Wolk
banner
wolksite.bsky.social
Wolk
@wolksite.bsky.social
He/him. Just your friendly neighborhood cloud!
Moderator at https://biosector01.com/
All opinions are my own. 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🏳️‍🌈
OK very much LOL. Here's a link to them instead: mega.nz/folder/m8NCG...
7.49 MB folder on MEGA
23 files
mega.nz
December 5, 2025 at 7:25 AM
I should also mention with the suffixes, sometimes they can have pretty significant skips. Sometimes it's just jumping from -03 to -05, but there's been a case of a jump from -15 to -50.
December 5, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Oh, and sometimes the tool stops delivering inventories. Just let it rest for a bit, it will come back online ;)
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Finally, you can cognate -01, -02, etc. to the LEGO number for some sets (particularily around the 2013-2017 year range) to get additional inventories. Some of these are prototypes, some are combiners. -01 appears to be the default, and typically also a prototype for these sets.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Currently, there is also a notable bug with that; what appears to be ABS parts in color 28 Dark Green are listed as "SAND GREEN".
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Plastics or measurements for cuts are sometimes included. "with Glitter" or "with Opal" is cognated onto the end, even for multicombination parts. This means you get things like "WARM GOLD WITH GLITTER", when it's really Co-injected Warm Gold + Transparent with Glitter.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
This means ink coating colors like Warm Gold, Drum Lacq. or Silver Ink are not listed, instead the base plastic color is. Multicombination parts are only listed with one of the used color (which is useful in itself), though which color varies from set to set.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Now, for LEGO color data: The data presented here is different from that you see on Pick a Brick or Customer Service (and subsequently, Brickset). That color data has a single color ID, but here it appears to be derived from a complex material data, which has additionally been processed by the API.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Don't forget that this is an inventory comparison tool, so you can compare two LEGO inventories, two Bricklink inventories, or a LEGO and a Bricklink inventory.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Widescreen mode also enables you to view the data of both inventories separately. Otherwise elements from the second set will just give you empty rows, if you are comparing to another set.

Always break Minifigures is also recommended for comparisons with Bricklink inventories.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Secondly, enable LEGO data. Without LEGO data, you are just getting what Bricklink recognizes the element ID to be (known on Bricklink as PCCs), which is not always correct, and often means you are getting empty rows for element IDs not on Bricklink.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
First of all, you can set both sources to LEGO data, which allows you to also set one of them to 0 (or any gibberish number) in order to get an empty inventory, which should ease things when looking at just one inventory.
December 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Of course, I have also noticed that people don't really seem to know how to use it properly, so I'll provide a little guide here.
December 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Of course, people now are calling these inventories "leaks", which I never have done, because it isn't a leak at all. Like I said in my other thread, I guess "leak" just generates clicks?
December 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
I was initially very cautious about it as the ability to access unreleased sets was something that might change if caught on to. However, I'm more confident now that it won't change.
December 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
An artist releasing their work on a franchise... might be a leak, might also not be. It depends on if they are in their right to do so, ultimately.
December 5, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Datamining a released build of a game is also not a leak, for that matter (although it may be spoilers). For instance, Mega Latios/Latias were in the data for XY, and that did spoil their introduction in ORAS, but it wasn't a leak.
December 5, 2025 at 6:38 AM
Here's the "leaked" Ninjago BAM figures, since the "leakers" aren't providing their source. Yes, these are just publically accessible documents. Literally nothing "leak" about them. "News" is a better word, maybe? :)
December 5, 2025 at 6:31 AM
Definitely makes a huge difference wow
December 5, 2025 at 6:21 AM