Another runway means higher emissions, more flights, and little economic benefit.

Instead of doubling down on airport expansion, the UK should focus on sustainable transport and policies that genuinely grow the economy without destroying the climate.

Sustainable aviation fuels are sold as a climate solution.

But the truth is: they’re costly, unscalable, and not ready for widespread use.

Instead of cutting emissions, they risk becoming a greenwashing excuse for dangerous airport expansion.

Local oil isn’t a strategy. It’s a distraction.

The government’s focus shouldn’t be on making fossil fuels last longer. It should be on moving faster toward a clean energy system.

More flights don’t mean a stronger economy.

The UK’s tourism spending deficit means that encouraging more flights actually sends money out of the country.

Far from damaging the economy, restricting flights would rebalance this, boosting growth where it matters: here.

The Chancellor says airport expansion will grow the economy.

But here’s the truth: business travel is flat, and more Brits fly out than tourists fly in.

So who’s benefiting? Mostly wealthy frequent flyers.

It’s time they paid for their pollution 👉 https://bit.ly/3FXQefR

Screen-free hands-on fun, anyone? We’ve got just the thing.

Fixperience Workshops, hosted at our Camden and Hackney Fixing Factories, are the perfect way to try something new this season.

🎟 Spaces are limited — reserve your spot today: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/cc/fixperience-workshops-3845323

Flying isn’t just a choice—it’s a demand engineered. Billions are spent advertising flights, selling holidays, status, and identity.

Yet aviation is one of the most polluting, least regulated sectors.

So, why are we still being sold something the planet can't afford?

Want to unlock extra annual leave? 🔓

Sign up to our FREE climate perks webinar to learn how you could get additional days off work.

🔗 https://action.wearepossible.org/page/119071/data/1

#ClimatePerks