First picture coming to mind, when I hear the term "barrier committee"...

💡Moving on to some of our most popular intel articles, first up we have James Ramsey and Andrew Macpherson, who asked "Is the academy equipping tomorrow’s intelligence
professionals to analyze data-centric threats?" Read it here & in our upcoming 20th bday collection! 🎉 ➡️ doi.org/10.1080/1833...

Definitely a line to try out at the bar next time: "hey babe, are you the structure of the port of Algiers? Call me Kent, the way I feel when I see you..."

me instantly trying to make out author/title of each of the books

No No No! Turn that shit up. Americans and Brits shouldn't be allowed to fancy Prussian military intellectualism, but not endure contemporary German shitposting. It's part of the deal!

Especially this post in particular. I need this tattooed into the eyeball of every "warfighter-lethality-dudebro" junior officer out there!

bsky.app/profile/carr...

Always ask yourself "what would be my point of breaking up?"/"what would be an order I couldn't act upon?"

Given how unpopular JD is, they're really going to take their shot at monarchy, aren't they? And SCOTUS is probably going to call it some shit like "hereditary unified presidentialism"...

(they mostly weren't), but they reflected heavily on all the issues how to behave in light of a highly illiberal and illegitimate political system, for example with regard to their oath. Long story short: people (esp military professionals) should read more stuff outside of their national borders

"how do we keep the military from turning rogue?" but in other countries there are schools of thought about the primary question "how should the military behave, if the state goes rogue?", which might be more applicable currently.
This is not to say that Stauffenberg et al were liberal
2/

I'm once again begging military intellectuals to study CivMilRelations outside the US, for example the military resistance of the Wehrmacht and the subsequent development of "Innere Führung" by Gen Baudissin in the Bundeswehr. I get that the primary question in the US has always been
1/

It might look like; and can you see how shiny some of it looks?; aren't we so smart for being intellectually open minded?"

Ironically, the whole article could have been written as a cautionary tale without changing its analytic core (his five models), but this is just as if the authors of "don't build the torment nexus" would've instead published "we don't know whether the torment nexus will come about, so here it what

The question of liberalism is not merely that of the rights of the weak. But that of the dignity of the strong.