Torben Andersen
@torbenandersen.bsky.social
CEO & Senior AI Advisor (Verdux.ai)
Digital strategist and entrepreneur. Sharing Nordic art @ ProjectNord.com. Used to be a serious player on Google+ 😎
Digital strategist and entrepreneur. Sharing Nordic art @ ProjectNord.com. Used to be a serious player on Google+ 😎
Det er en fantastisk måde, at få ryddet op i sine abonnementer 🤷 Der ligger den reelle besparelse ved at skifte bank gemt.
December 1, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Det er en fantastisk måde, at få ryddet op i sine abonnementer 🤷 Der ligger den reelle besparelse ved at skifte bank gemt.
This is the truth. It has become abundantly clear that nobody in the US will stand up to honor it's commitment to NATO. Putin knows this.
Fortunately European countries have forces on the ground in the Baltics.
Denmark currently has a combat battalion in Latvia.
www.forsvaret.dk/da/opgaver/i...
Fortunately European countries have forces on the ground in the Baltics.
Denmark currently has a combat battalion in Latvia.
www.forsvaret.dk/da/opgaver/i...
Letland – sikring af NATOs østlige flanke
Danmark leder NATO-hovedkvarteret Multinationale Division North i Letland. Danmark deployerer periodevis og i andet halvår af 2025 troppebidrag til Letland, hvor de bidrager til at sikre NATOs østlige...
www.forsvaret.dk
December 1, 2025 at 6:58 AM
This is the truth. It has become abundantly clear that nobody in the US will stand up to honor it's commitment to NATO. Putin knows this.
Fortunately European countries have forces on the ground in the Baltics.
Denmark currently has a combat battalion in Latvia.
www.forsvaret.dk/da/opgaver/i...
Fortunately European countries have forces on the ground in the Baltics.
Denmark currently has a combat battalion in Latvia.
www.forsvaret.dk/da/opgaver/i...
That is very simple. It would hurt us more.
The free world has based their entire economies on the friendship and alliance with the United States.
This betrayal was unimaginable and while sanctions on Russia has caused some problems in Europe, sanctions against the US would cripple our economies.
The free world has based their entire economies on the friendship and alliance with the United States.
This betrayal was unimaginable and while sanctions on Russia has caused some problems in Europe, sanctions against the US would cripple our economies.
December 1, 2025 at 6:50 AM
That is very simple. It would hurt us more.
The free world has based their entire economies on the friendship and alliance with the United States.
This betrayal was unimaginable and while sanctions on Russia has caused some problems in Europe, sanctions against the US would cripple our economies.
The free world has based their entire economies on the friendship and alliance with the United States.
This betrayal was unimaginable and while sanctions on Russia has caused some problems in Europe, sanctions against the US would cripple our economies.
Enig. Det bliver selvfølgelig en politisk beslutning om bias på en given platform er for slem til at man vil være der.
X har klart krydset den grænse for mig. TikTok er mindre åbenlys.
For TikTok gælder det mere, at brugernes primært vil underholdes. Så "alvorligt" indhold bliver ikke prioriteret.
X har klart krydset den grænse for mig. TikTok er mindre åbenlys.
For TikTok gælder det mere, at brugernes primært vil underholdes. Så "alvorligt" indhold bliver ikke prioriteret.
November 29, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Enig. Det bliver selvfølgelig en politisk beslutning om bias på en given platform er for slem til at man vil være der.
X har klart krydset den grænse for mig. TikTok er mindre åbenlys.
For TikTok gælder det mere, at brugernes primært vil underholdes. Så "alvorligt" indhold bliver ikke prioriteret.
X har klart krydset den grænse for mig. TikTok er mindre åbenlys.
For TikTok gælder det mere, at brugernes primært vil underholdes. Så "alvorligt" indhold bliver ikke prioriteret.
Deres analyse er helt forkert. TikTok mv. er ikke længere sociale medier. De er underholdningsplatforme. TikTok er mao. en leverance platform. Et medie.
Det er DR og TV2 ikke. De er (eller burde være) "content creators", som skal distribuere deres indhold via diverse platforme (inkl TikTok).
Det er DR og TV2 ikke. De er (eller burde være) "content creators", som skal distribuere deres indhold via diverse platforme (inkl TikTok).
November 29, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Deres analyse er helt forkert. TikTok mv. er ikke længere sociale medier. De er underholdningsplatforme. TikTok er mao. en leverance platform. Et medie.
Det er DR og TV2 ikke. De er (eller burde være) "content creators", som skal distribuere deres indhold via diverse platforme (inkl TikTok).
Det er DR og TV2 ikke. De er (eller burde være) "content creators", som skal distribuere deres indhold via diverse platforme (inkl TikTok).
Det primært kriterie for valide strikes bliver, at de ser cool ud på video... og at målene ser tilstrækkeligt solbrændt ud. Om det så foregår i Venezuela eller i Texas er mindre afgørende.
November 28, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Det primært kriterie for valide strikes bliver, at de ser cool ud på video... og at målene ser tilstrækkeligt solbrændt ud. Om det så foregår i Venezuela eller i Texas er mindre afgørende.
Det er jeg principielt enig i. Samtidig skal myndigheder forstå at håndtere balancen imellem faglige og politiske hensyn.
Som mit eksempel viser, rummer selv de sikreste IT-løsning reelle risici. Den risk/reward afvejning er en politisk beslutning - som nødvendigvis må tages på objektivt grundlag.
Som mit eksempel viser, rummer selv de sikreste IT-løsning reelle risici. Den risk/reward afvejning er en politisk beslutning - som nødvendigvis må tages på objektivt grundlag.
November 28, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Det er jeg principielt enig i. Samtidig skal myndigheder forstå at håndtere balancen imellem faglige og politiske hensyn.
Som mit eksempel viser, rummer selv de sikreste IT-løsning reelle risici. Den risk/reward afvejning er en politisk beslutning - som nødvendigvis må tages på objektivt grundlag.
Som mit eksempel viser, rummer selv de sikreste IT-løsning reelle risici. Den risk/reward afvejning er en politisk beslutning - som nødvendigvis må tages på objektivt grundlag.
Yes! The "Danish model" is the way. Ramping up European arms production is slow and expensive.
But we need to protect the Ukrainian production facilities from Russian attacks.
But we need to protect the Ukrainian production facilities from Russian attacks.
November 27, 2025 at 10:27 AM
Yes! The "Danish model" is the way. Ramping up European arms production is slow and expensive.
But we need to protect the Ukrainian production facilities from Russian attacks.
But we need to protect the Ukrainian production facilities from Russian attacks.
I don't disagree.
European security used to be a common goal we worked together to ensure. It was the foundation of NATO.
Europe has stepped up and is now the sole provider of support for Ukraine.
More is needed, but the type of "support" the US offers, we would rather be without.
European security used to be a common goal we worked together to ensure. It was the foundation of NATO.
Europe has stepped up and is now the sole provider of support for Ukraine.
More is needed, but the type of "support" the US offers, we would rather be without.
November 27, 2025 at 10:22 AM
I don't disagree.
European security used to be a common goal we worked together to ensure. It was the foundation of NATO.
Europe has stepped up and is now the sole provider of support for Ukraine.
More is needed, but the type of "support" the US offers, we would rather be without.
European security used to be a common goal we worked together to ensure. It was the foundation of NATO.
Europe has stepped up and is now the sole provider of support for Ukraine.
More is needed, but the type of "support" the US offers, we would rather be without.
That is a very solid point!
November 26, 2025 at 8:11 PM
That is a very solid point!
It is - unfortunately - not "overwhelmingly positive".
55% want to continue or increase support. Barely a majority.
And it doesn't even say anything about how important this is to them compared to domestic issues. Enough to influence the way they vote?
today.yougov.com/politics/art...
55% want to continue or increase support. Barely a majority.
And it doesn't even say anything about how important this is to them compared to domestic issues. Enough to influence the way they vote?
today.yougov.com/politics/art...
November 26, 2025 at 6:52 PM
It is - unfortunately - not "overwhelmingly positive".
55% want to continue or increase support. Barely a majority.
And it doesn't even say anything about how important this is to them compared to domestic issues. Enough to influence the way they vote?
today.yougov.com/politics/art...
55% want to continue or increase support. Barely a majority.
And it doesn't even say anything about how important this is to them compared to domestic issues. Enough to influence the way they vote?
today.yougov.com/politics/art...
NATO will do not such thing as long as the United States is a (leading) member.
The only actor which might intervene is the EU or individual states... but there is no unified command structure and fears angering Trump (and Putin).
The only actor which might intervene is the EU or individual states... but there is no unified command structure and fears angering Trump (and Putin).
November 26, 2025 at 6:45 PM
NATO will do not such thing as long as the United States is a (leading) member.
The only actor which might intervene is the EU or individual states... but there is no unified command structure and fears angering Trump (and Putin).
The only actor which might intervene is the EU or individual states... but there is no unified command structure and fears angering Trump (and Putin).
Low-key den klareste årsag til ikke at bruge LinkedIn.
November 26, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Low-key den klareste årsag til ikke at bruge LinkedIn.
What.the.actual.fuck!
Vi vader - med lukkede øjne og stor overbevisning- direkte i USAs fodspor.
Vi vader - med lukkede øjne og stor overbevisning- direkte i USAs fodspor.
November 26, 2025 at 6:27 PM
What.the.actual.fuck!
Vi vader - med lukkede øjne og stor overbevisning- direkte i USAs fodspor.
Vi vader - med lukkede øjne og stor overbevisning- direkte i USAs fodspor.
It may only be a minority that actively supports giving territory to Russia, but pool it with the people who do not care - and the conclusion is clear: supporting Ukraine is a minority opinion in the US.
A reality check for us in Europe, but European security is not a priority for the US public.
A reality check for us in Europe, but European security is not a priority for the US public.
November 26, 2025 at 3:04 PM
It may only be a minority that actively supports giving territory to Russia, but pool it with the people who do not care - and the conclusion is clear: supporting Ukraine is a minority opinion in the US.
A reality check for us in Europe, but European security is not a priority for the US public.
A reality check for us in Europe, but European security is not a priority for the US public.
Selvfølgelig kan Trump simpelthen erklære Kongressen for opløst eller demokraternes valg ugyldigt. Og Højesteret kan enten tie eller bakke ham op.
Men så åbenlyst et kup, vil nok være svært at forsvare. I sidste ende sidder enhver politiker/leder jo på basis af folkets vilje...
Men så åbenlyst et kup, vil nok være svært at forsvare. I sidste ende sidder enhver politiker/leder jo på basis af folkets vilje...
November 25, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Selvfølgelig kan Trump simpelthen erklære Kongressen for opløst eller demokraternes valg ugyldigt. Og Højesteret kan enten tie eller bakke ham op.
Men så åbenlyst et kup, vil nok være svært at forsvare. I sidste ende sidder enhver politiker/leder jo på basis af folkets vilje...
Men så åbenlyst et kup, vil nok være svært at forsvare. I sidste ende sidder enhver politiker/leder jo på basis af folkets vilje...
Jeg har været lidt nede i det kaninhul. Den gamle kongres ophører med at eksistere den 3. januar. Den nye kongres kommer automatisk i eksistens samme dag kl 12. Medlemmerne kan derefter selv organisere sig.
Kun den nye kongres kan bedømme valgets validitet. Ikke retten. Ikke den gamle kongres.
Kun den nye kongres kan bedømme valgets validitet. Ikke retten. Ikke den gamle kongres.
November 25, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Jeg har været lidt nede i det kaninhul. Den gamle kongres ophører med at eksistere den 3. januar. Den nye kongres kommer automatisk i eksistens samme dag kl 12. Medlemmerne kan derefter selv organisere sig.
Kun den nye kongres kan bedømme valgets validitet. Ikke retten. Ikke den gamle kongres.
Kun den nye kongres kan bedømme valgets validitet. Ikke retten. Ikke den gamle kongres.
Valgene afholdes og godkendes i staterne. Kongressen kan selvfølgelig forsøge samme trick som sidst, men det er anderledes end præsidentvalg. Kongressen opløses automatisk når valgperioden udløber.
MEN de kan nemt undertrykke valgdeltagelse ved at postere ICE ved blå valgsteder i sving-distrikter!
MEN de kan nemt undertrykke valgdeltagelse ved at postere ICE ved blå valgsteder i sving-distrikter!
November 25, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Valgene afholdes og godkendes i staterne. Kongressen kan selvfølgelig forsøge samme trick som sidst, men det er anderledes end præsidentvalg. Kongressen opløses automatisk når valgperioden udløber.
MEN de kan nemt undertrykke valgdeltagelse ved at postere ICE ved blå valgsteder i sving-distrikter!
MEN de kan nemt undertrykke valgdeltagelse ved at postere ICE ved blå valgsteder i sving-distrikter!
Hvordan er det overraskende, at medicin holder op med at virke, når man stopper med at tage medicinen?
November 25, 2025 at 6:04 AM
Hvordan er det overraskende, at medicin holder op med at virke, når man stopper med at tage medicinen?
I think you are kinda forgetting this list of military expenditure per country.
Venezuela will just join the list of countries attacked by the United States.
Of course, there might be attacks in the United States by irregular forces (i.e. terrorist attacks) - but only the US public can stop this.
Venezuela will just join the list of countries attacked by the United States.
Of course, there might be attacks in the United States by irregular forces (i.e. terrorist attacks) - but only the US public can stop this.
November 24, 2025 at 6:08 AM
I think you are kinda forgetting this list of military expenditure per country.
Venezuela will just join the list of countries attacked by the United States.
Of course, there might be attacks in the United States by irregular forces (i.e. terrorist attacks) - but only the US public can stop this.
Venezuela will just join the list of countries attacked by the United States.
Of course, there might be attacks in the United States by irregular forces (i.e. terrorist attacks) - but only the US public can stop this.