Tom Hollenstein
@tomhollenstein.bsky.social
Applying Developmental Pscyh theory and research on adolescent emotion & regulation, parent-child interaction dynamics to more robust and informative understanding of youth digital experiences
Such a great paper. I use it in my classes.
October 1, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Such a great paper. I use it in my classes.
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
Not surprisingly I have lots of thoughts on this. But in a nutshell, Yes, we should support teachers and no students should not be on their phones in class (unless they are integrated into the class plan or supporting learning), but, most teachers and schools had already solved this problem...
August 25, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Not surprisingly I have lots of thoughts on this. But in a nutshell, Yes, we should support teachers and no students should not be on their phones in class (unless they are integrated into the class plan or supporting learning), but, most teachers and schools had already solved this problem...
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
with phones in backpacks, lockers, or in holders at the back of the room. So the bans are doing little to change access to phones, are costing us lot of money (with these bizarre yonder pouches), time, and resources and are not solving any of the real problems that young people are facing - so...
August 25, 2025 at 5:27 PM
with phones in backpacks, lockers, or in holders at the back of the room. So the bans are doing little to change access to phones, are costing us lot of money (with these bizarre yonder pouches), time, and resources and are not solving any of the real problems that young people are facing - so...
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
the danger is that adults claim victory and believe they have saved the children, when in reality they have just kicked down an already open door and did nothing to support youth mental health (oh, and by the way, we are in the midst of an adult mental health crisis but keep pointing only at youth)
August 25, 2025 at 5:27 PM
the danger is that adults claim victory and believe they have saved the children, when in reality they have just kicked down an already open door and did nothing to support youth mental health (oh, and by the way, we are in the midst of an adult mental health crisis but keep pointing only at youth)
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
More details on [the program here](liminal-learning.com/program). Liminal Learning is a nonprofit, aiming to provide 30% of its places on scholarship over its lifetime.
Liminal Learning
Liminal Learning offers a comprehensive “world-readiness” program that prepares young people (ages ~18–24 years) to thrive. Young people need strong friendships, a sense of agency, and trusted mentors...
liminal-learning.com
August 25, 2025 at 5:39 PM
More details on [the program here](liminal-learning.com/program). Liminal Learning is a nonprofit, aiming to provide 30% of its places on scholarship over its lifetime.
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
The yearlong program helps young people find their way in work, study, and life. We start with a weeklong retreat in the wilderness (Quest), and continues with online and offline programming. Check out some of the testimonials from our last cohort: liminallearning.substack.com
The Liminal Post | Liminal Learning | Substack
News and community updates from Liminal Learning — a collective launch into purposeful adulthood. Click to read The Liminal Post, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers.
liminallearning.substack.com
August 25, 2025 at 5:39 PM
The yearlong program helps young people find their way in work, study, and life. We start with a weeklong retreat in the wilderness (Quest), and continues with online and offline programming. Check out some of the testimonials from our last cohort: liminallearning.substack.com
one of the best books I ever read. read it twice.
July 23, 2025 at 2:15 AM
one of the best books I ever read. read it twice.
Well I guess rivalries can be a force for good, eh?
July 14, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Well I guess rivalries can be a force for good, eh?
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
It's a distinction from @kph3k.bsky.social's Genetic Lottery. I used it before even without talking about genetics; it catches a lot of the misconceptions that student have about what it means to call something a cause. Those misconceptions also led to a blog post: www.the100.ci/2024/06/26/s...
July 7, 2025 at 1:44 PM
It's a distinction from @kph3k.bsky.social's Genetic Lottery. I used it before even without talking about genetics; it catches a lot of the misconceptions that student have about what it means to call something a cause. Those misconceptions also led to a blog post: www.the100.ci/2024/06/26/s...
rivalry schmivalry 😉, we're all on the same team doing what we can for the collective. This is just the beginning.
June 5, 2025 at 3:41 PM
rivalry schmivalry 😉, we're all on the same team doing what we can for the collective. This is just the beginning.
Reposted by Tom Hollenstein
If I am reading this correctly, this version with a rational x-axis provides evidence for a different conclusion than the paper seems to offer:
A (slight) majority of experts say that there is any evidence at all for only one of the 26 claims investigated.
bsky.app/profile/rube...
A (slight) majority of experts say that there is any evidence at all for only one of the 26 claims investigated.
bsky.app/profile/rube...
Here's a graph I made what it would look like if we took the maximal level of evidence everybody endorsed.
May 20, 2025 at 6:21 PM
If I am reading this correctly, this version with a rational x-axis provides evidence for a different conclusion than the paper seems to offer:
A (slight) majority of experts say that there is any evidence at all for only one of the 26 claims investigated.
bsky.app/profile/rube...
A (slight) majority of experts say that there is any evidence at all for only one of the 26 claims investigated.
bsky.app/profile/rube...