susiegoh.bsky.social
@susiegoh.bsky.social
She obviously hasn’t read The Beatitudes recently.
November 28, 2025 at 8:21 PM
She obviously hasn’t read The Beatitudes recently.
Not in the same category perhaps!
November 27, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Not in the same category perhaps!
Wasn’t it his ‘girl-friend’ who bought it?
November 27, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Wasn’t it his ‘girl-friend’ who bought it?
I could be wrong but didn’t that very same Starmer remove the Whip from backbenchers on the very same issue sometime back that is before he changed his mind?!?
Just posted this!
Just posted this!
November 27, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I could be wrong but didn’t that very same Starmer remove the Whip from backbenchers on the very same issue sometime back that is before he changed his mind?!?
Just posted this!
Just posted this!
Agree. See: Brexit Wish!
November 27, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Agree. See: Brexit Wish!
I have one, too.
November 27, 2025 at 2:53 PM
I have one, too.
I could be wrong but didn’t that very same Starmer remove the Whip from backbenchers on the very same issue sometime back that is before he changed his mind?!?
November 27, 2025 at 2:48 PM
I could be wrong but didn’t that very same Starmer remove the Whip from backbenchers on the very same issue sometime back that is before he changed his mind?!?
Thanks for this. No child’s development should be tampered with. I might have got this wrong but ‘conversion therapy’ comes to mind.
November 22, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Thanks for this. No child’s development should be tampered with. I might have got this wrong but ‘conversion therapy’ comes to mind.
This sounds appalling. I am a psychologist/psychotherapist. Is this some sort of genetic engineering? I may have misunderstood. I sincerely hope so. I was totally against the Tavistock. Is this a continuation?
November 22, 2025 at 3:05 PM
This sounds appalling. I am a psychologist/psychotherapist. Is this some sort of genetic engineering? I may have misunderstood. I sincerely hope so. I was totally against the Tavistock. Is this a continuation?
McSweeney/Starmer?
November 22, 2025 at 11:49 AM
McSweeney/Starmer?
It is a ridiculous ill-thought out premise. It makes no sense at all and shows little understanding of the general levels of English in a multi-cultural society where language and grammar have been modified over decades.
November 22, 2025 at 11:23 AM
It is a ridiculous ill-thought out premise. It makes no sense at all and shows little understanding of the general levels of English in a multi-cultural society where language and grammar have been modified over decades.
Personally, psychologically Reeves is coming across as ‘on the edge’. Like a lemming ‘making a headlong rush to destruction’. She is therefore not capable of making sensible decisions. She is attempting to save ‘herself’. All authority has gone. She needs to be relieved of her duties!
November 14, 2025 at 11:42 AM
Personally, psychologically Reeves is coming across as ‘on the edge’. Like a lemming ‘making a headlong rush to destruction’. She is therefore not capable of making sensible decisions. She is attempting to save ‘herself’. All authority has gone. She needs to be relieved of her duties!
Reeves’ lack of competency is absolute rubbish
November 14, 2025 at 10:39 AM
Reeves’ lack of competency is absolute rubbish
It has always come across to me that Starmer is the ‘MacSweeney Project’. A puppet even!
November 12, 2025 at 11:17 AM
It has always come across to me that Starmer is the ‘MacSweeney Project’. A puppet even!
Nandy was so much better in Opposition.
November 9, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Nandy was so much better in Opposition.
That’s beautiful!
October 25, 2025 at 6:48 PM
That’s beautiful!
Well done. I lit a candle. Works well. Sleep well tonight.
October 15, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Well done. I lit a candle. Works well. Sleep well tonight.
And….the Roman Catholics have their marriage Tribunal Court that decides on annulments which allows a RC to remarry in a sacramental setting
September 26, 2025 at 5:46 PM
And….the Roman Catholics have their marriage Tribunal Court that decides on annulments which allows a RC to remarry in a sacramental setting
It maybe that the problem is that Starmer has no views of his own or lacks confidence in his views and therefore relies on MacSweeney. A puppet comes to mind.
September 26, 2025 at 5:12 PM
It maybe that the problem is that Starmer has no views of his own or lacks confidence in his views and therefore relies on MacSweeney. A puppet comes to mind.