My last game was 3x Undertakers vs Balancers. We absolutely MELTED everything in front of us and had an absolute ball. We were able to do the main event of the map and clear out one of the legacy dungeons.

The N2 boss also got countered super hard by a thing I bought from Libra... so pay attention!

Her weapon affinity being maces is also seriously cool as it's a nice moveset, especially her 1 handed variation.

I also like the fact that she has enough faith to be dangerous with incants too, you get some nice combos with her playstyle. I don't know the good incants, so I have things to learn.

Gave Undertaker a spin on Adel, she's REALLY fun. Especially if you have two or more of her on the team since you just rain ults one after another after another.

Honestly... might be my new main for a while.

It just sucks we need to do so much self-censorship because these multinational corporations are afraid of areolas or too many scawwy words.

But in college I decided I was going to do the law thing since I felt like I was too dumb to make a career out of programming. One semester of classes made me realize that I was going to be miserable, so I decided to shoot my shot.

15ish years later and here I am. It was the right choice for sure.

As a kid I learned to program because I wanted to make a site like NG and/or make games. While I was never quite "successful" with either endeavor, each bit of iteration got me further and further down the road.

By end of HS I had a somewhat strange triad of TI-BASIC, Python, and PHP in my stable.

I've never seen any of these reporters ask a hardball question to anyone, but the second Mamdani steps into the Oval Office they suddenly discover that ability.

I'm not going to say I'm entirely satisfied with his responses, but strategically it makes sense I suppose. Overall he did well though.

Ageed.

The main arg is "well it's all public so nothing can stop alt appview indexing." Which is true, but the same applies to convo controls. Even if it isn't *perfect*, it's still *useful*.

I hope they can figure out private data though. That's just a massive improvement for the whole ecosystem.

Bluesky doesn't really let you make the same choice as in the last bit. You could maybe make do with a custom feed, but it's a lot of effort for something that could just be a "only show me open conversations" filter.

I think the more options people have, the better their experience.

If you saw two people at a bench, you wouldn't jump in between. If you walked into a park and saw a banner for an open event, you might consider walking up.

Likewise, if you knew that some restaurant was a popular date spot, you might consider choosing another venue if that wasn't your vibe today.

I am not disputing what you're staying here and I am in fact *affirming* it. I think it's extremely important to be able to send these signals and I think Bsky does a good job of outlining consent.

Where we disagree is that I believe it's also a healthy thing to allow people to filter on this.

One good thing with Bsky is that we can create the experience we want. I don't think anyone is better or worse for their preferences here.

Someone like you might value seeing these "limited" conversations in the public feed, someone like the other poster might not. The more options, the better!

This is an incredibly strange framing, I don't think most people want to "interrupt" anything. Some people value the discussion aspect of social media, others less so. If conversation is intentionally limited, why shouldn't people who value the open social component have the ability to filter?