No one of consequence
banner
stackman.bsky.social
No one of consequence
@stackman.bsky.social
Vell, just zis guy, you know?
Shh! You're saying the quiet part out lo...
Regulatory capture! We got regulatory capture in here!
a man wearing glasses and a hawaiian shirt says `` see , nobody cares ''
ALT: a man wearing glasses and a hawaiian shirt says `` see , nobody cares ''
media.tenor.com
November 26, 2025 at 7:50 PM
It's the same shit FB pulled. "Oooh oooh our algorithm is so dangerous it can impact elections and destabilize the world! We need regulation because anybody can use it an irresponsibly low price! Please, regulate away these AMAZING DEALS!"
November 26, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Back when that one dude from Google started telling everyone that they had a sentient AI there was much ballyhooing about its theoretical rights. Then ChatGPT dropped, people learned what an LLM was, and those concerns went pffft like a fart in the wind.
November 26, 2025 at 6:51 PM
I assume that the story's author's name is ironic.
November 26, 2025 at 6:47 PM
The replication crisis must be addressed but releasing a paper still provides the opportunity to replicate the results. Suggesting that results you dislike can't be trusted, that they won't be replicated because of the replication crisis, and not replicating them doesn't leave much room to learn.
November 26, 2025 at 4:26 PM
That's kind of the point of releasing the paper - so other people can test and replicate the results.
November 26, 2025 at 3:58 PM
9/10 scientists recommend an early morning dong crop to start your day.
November 26, 2025 at 3:46 PM
And yet you still have the Bootstrap Brigade defiantly challenging reality and hollering that avocado toast and lattes are the real culprit.
November 25, 2025 at 2:50 PM
There were disjoined set pieces that were compelling in isolation but the connective tissue was crap. It would have been better as an anthology series of early Rebel Alliance stories.
November 25, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Ice cream phone? Holy shit they did it. Those crazy bastards actually did it.
November 25, 2025 at 3:21 AM
We use spongy gooey bits, they use rigid metal bits. But hey, whatever floats your boat. I'm not gonna kink shame.
November 24, 2025 at 6:54 PM
It's notable that Turing himself replaced "think" with behavior because of the ambiguity inherent in the term.
November 24, 2025 at 6:51 PM
There is also the understanding that this knowledge means individuals will be held accountable for their actions. Suggesting that enlisted soldiers are unable to discern right from wrong is not only demeaning, it's ignorant. 2/2
November 24, 2025 at 6:05 PM
One real differentiator in US armed forces is the systemic respect for enlistees' ability to discern what is and is not a legal order. There is training on what is and is not a legal order because the oath uses SPECIFIC words that have CLEAR meanings, not in spite of it. 1/2
November 24, 2025 at 6:05 PM
It really would be worth your time to read the article. It's a little long-winded at parts but I doubt it would take you much time to get through.
Long story short, though - "buy a smaller home/rent/pay off debt, and save" is a naive suggestion for many households making 100k/yr.
November 24, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Yes, because costs are the same everywhere and everyone is in a circumstance that you, personally, can understand and judge.
November 24, 2025 at 3:57 PM
I'm making double that and looking for a house and... well... look, you might want to sit down because I have news that's not great...
November 24, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Wait wait wait hold up - you mean to say that people like stuff that's good? And that the way to make good stuff is to give talented people the resources they need and trust them to do their job? Holy. Fucking. Shitballs. That's amazing. Just... mind blown. Wow.
- someone at HBO, probably.
November 24, 2025 at 3:48 PM
It kind of sucks that we live in a time of such uncritical credulity that satire is effectively dead.
November 24, 2025 at 2:56 PM
That doesn't matter. They're not reliant on scraping the internet to create the models. Why do you think AI companies are making multi-year agreements with media organizations and sites like Reddit? To get a trove of up-to-date, structured data.
November 24, 2025 at 6:19 AM
I'm not sure if this is a misstatement or a misunderstanding, but it's incorrect. Once a model is trained it does not need any additional data to function.
November 24, 2025 at 6:09 AM
There is something cosmically pathetic about the wealthiest person in the history of our species being so unimaginably fragile that he needs his ego constantly fluffed by a soulless, mindless tool.
November 21, 2025 at 4:09 PM
I don't know, I think we'll look back fondly on the last true moment of stupid unity. Across the political aisle, from different backgrounds and states, from sea to shining sea, the government united to say, with one voice, "we don't understand this thing our kids like and that scares us."
November 21, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Yes, because it's the "criminal illegals" who are buying houses over asking, all cash, with no contingencies, doing a shoddy reno job and either flipping them or renting them at exorbitant rates. Curses to all you cash-flush illegals!!
November 20, 2025 at 9:58 PM
I think it's really Amazon that worries me. The old 24 episodes a season produced some real clunky shit, but it gave the characters room to breath. If they pump out an 8-episode season and don't nail the character beats, Amazon's liable to drop it faster than you can say Wheel of Time.
November 20, 2025 at 6:51 AM