Worse than too chickenshit to get into a gunfight with ice, he’s Canadian

I can’t even imagine the mindset of someone who lives here and can’t decide even a year out which party they plan to vote for. That’s more confusing to me than just always voting Republican (evil)

It’s easy to try to estimate that kind of person so badly you end up steering towards a worse choice

They’re at odds only if my estimation for what the electorate wants is accurate

But it repeatedly hasn’t been, so it’s less bad to just vote my heart rather than trying to be calculating

I think she’s too polarizing and less likely to win state wide, I will also still be voting for her in the primary because I like her more and what the hell do I actually know about the average voter

When you win a gun fight with ice you can come back and give this advice

Right now you’re just trying to put other peoples lives on the lines so they can maybe scare ice

Not even just legal ramifications here, if you’re surrounded by a half dozen ice agents and blast one odds are you aren’t making it to a court room no matter how justified you are

This also isn’t even really true, yes it does some concentrating, but the proportion of polluted water that ever even goes through the data center and the extent it gets concentrated sum to being barely more than negligible

If you removed every data center yesterday the problem would be identical

Look their kids can’t be expected to have to compete against the whole population, put most of the kids back in the factory and make sure their kid gets a locked in spot at the firm, competency be damned

The position I’ve come to in the past decade is that it should only be available for crimes committed while serving in the government

What Trump/hegseth/bradley have done is a worse crime than a random serial killer having killed the same number, ~80, people

Ryan reynolds really is the most Mr beast movie star

It has to be the expenses for the shoots rather than the prizes, they just aren’t that huge

years ago at under 1/10 his current size he was talking about how his whole strategy was to put everything the last video and more made into the next one

The most clear statement from the party is is “no invasion without congressional consent” not “no invasion” and given which party controls Congress it’s hard to see those as the same thing

The bigger thing with code pink imo is them being funded by China and their absolute defense of the treatment of Uyghurs in xinjiang

Is there even a text to look at or was it just a clip of Hawley talking about it?

Oh you already included this later down