Siya Shao
@siyashao.bsky.social
Postdoc in Lawrence Berkeley Lab & University of Arizona | Former postdoc in Hicks Pries Lab at Dartmouth and former PhD in McGill University | Ecosystem modeling, Plant-microbe-mineral interaction, Soil CNP cycles, Nature-based solutions
Thanks Ben for your support and guidance along the way!
October 25, 2025 at 4:36 AM
Thanks Ben for your support and guidance along the way!
Big shout out to all my co-authors: Zachary Shortt (once Dartmouth undergrad, now PhD @ WSU), and my amazing supervisors: Prof. Caitlin Hicks Pries and @bsulman.bsky.social
October 23, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Big shout out to all my co-authors: Zachary Shortt (once Dartmouth undergrad, now PhD @ WSU), and my amazing supervisors: Prof. Caitlin Hicks Pries and @bsulman.bsky.social
We found mixed mycorrhizal forests had the lowest mycorrhizal C cost — and potentially greater growth — compared to AM- or ECM-dominated forests.
We also found that warming and N deposition reduced mycorrhizal C costs (favoring AM), while elevated CO₂ increased them (favoring ECM).
We also found that warming and N deposition reduced mycorrhizal C costs (favoring AM), while elevated CO₂ increased them (favoring ECM).
October 23, 2025 at 7:46 PM
We found mixed mycorrhizal forests had the lowest mycorrhizal C cost — and potentially greater growth — compared to AM- or ECM-dominated forests.
We also found that warming and N deposition reduced mycorrhizal C costs (favoring AM), while elevated CO₂ increased them (favoring ECM).
We also found that warming and N deposition reduced mycorrhizal C costs (favoring AM), while elevated CO₂ increased them (favoring ECM).