https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6SuW5HhQoc
Russia's crushing of the Chechens already showed it is down but not out.
Russia's crushing of the Chechens already showed it is down but not out.
A sad day for Ukraine, but at least they didn't go down without a fight.
Ukrainians aside, it's you emotionalists who will suffer most from this, I simply tried to warn you.
A sad day for Ukraine, but at least they didn't go down without a fight.
Ukrainians aside, it's you emotionalists who will suffer most from this, I simply tried to warn you.
Military-aged population size.
We won't know until the end of the war what effect drones had, but it's unlikely to significantly change the equation.
Military-aged population size.
We won't know until the end of the war what effect drones had, but it's unlikely to significantly change the equation.
But surely they must cohere *somewhat* to have lasted this long!
Money alone cannot bring coherence.
Hence why it is likely Ukraine will lose, like the Confederacy, as long as the Russians are willing to fight as much and as long as necessary.
But surely they must cohere *somewhat* to have lasted this long!
Money alone cannot bring coherence.
Hence why it is likely Ukraine will lose, like the Confederacy, as long as the Russians are willing to fight as much and as long as necessary.
Seismologists can tell when an earthquake is coming, even if there is little precision on when.
Peter never claims 100% precise foreknowledge.
Seismologists can tell when an earthquake is coming, even if there is little precision on when.
Peter never claims 100% precise foreknowledge.
Or are you seriously expecting the Russians to abide by such principles out of the goodness of their hearts?
Or are you seriously expecting the Russians to abide by such principles out of the goodness of their hearts?
This is not solely because of feeling, but because of their numerical advantages, which Ukraine, for the most vital mobilizable population, lacks)
This is not solely because of feeling, but because of their numerical advantages, which Ukraine, for the most vital mobilizable population, lacks)
The reason Ukraine loses is simple: a great disparity in the military capacities of the adversaries.
It matters not if you're a fool who believes that feelings are likely to beat cold hard math.
The reason Ukraine loses is simple: a great disparity in the military capacities of the adversaries.
It matters not if you're a fool who believes that feelings are likely to beat cold hard math.
Maybe one day this will be conducted more peacefully, as stated above, both a common enemy & common gain increase asabiya & industry allows non-militaristic common gain, a potential sportman-like order.
But global cooperation requires global identity, not there yet.
Maybe one day this will be conducted more peacefully, as stated above, both a common enemy & common gain increase asabiya & industry allows non-militaristic common gain, a potential sportman-like order.
But global cooperation requires global identity, not there yet.
Primarily American client states.
bsky.app/profile/mars...
Primarily American client states.
bsky.app/profile/mars...
It's horrible deal, but Ukraine is in a horrible position.
And we are partly the ones who put them there by half-assing our support & weakening ourselves/the Western alliance with Neoliberalism.
It's horrible deal, but Ukraine is in a horrible position.
And we are partly the ones who put them there by half-assing our support & weakening ourselves/the Western alliance with Neoliberalism.
Having more shells does not inherently make them less lethal, but an abundance of shells can lead to tactics that decrease the average lethality per shell in a conflict.
However, what's important here is having enough weapons to sustain operations.
Having more shells does not inherently make them less lethal, but an abundance of shells can lead to tactics that decrease the average lethality per shell in a conflict.
However, what's important here is having enough weapons to sustain operations.