If you're confused, I uploaded the presentation as well www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv7o...

Edinburgh comma,

If you are interested in joining a lively and supportive discussion space about sustainability & graphics research, please join our birds of a feather event on Tue Aug. 12 - 4PM, in East Building, Room 9 🌱

Co-organized with Felix Hähnlein, Chenxi Liu, Maria Larsson, and @rubenwiersma.nl

I agree. It would be a bandaid solution for a much deeper and complex underlying problem. Applying the bandaid shouldn’t lull us into thinking things are alright, but it’s frustrating to think that such blatant faults could slip through.

Friendlier implementation: add this as a check during submission and notify authors during submission + reviewers during review, similar to a plagiarism checks.

In an ideal world authors would not submit work they can't vouch for, but I've already heard multiple accounts of papers (under review and published) having non-existent citations. We also cannot expect reviewers to check this: automated writing scales, reviewer time has a limit.

Thank you!! I'm really sorry you couldn't make it, you were dearly missed!

If you have questions or feedback, I'd love to hear!

My hope is that it finds use in research: technical art history, computer graphics, creative tools, etc. If you find a good usecase or are interested in collaborating, please reach out, I'd love to learn about it! 3/3

The dataset contains hyperspectral scans of nine reconstructions of historical paintings and ten historic pigments. The code provides tools to process and load this data and utilities to work with hyperspectral data (e.g., stitching scans, conversion to RGB). 2/3

A human (who cared) might have actually centered the text in the text box 😒