Rob Hansen
@rjhansen.bsky.social
(An open letter to _The Dispatch._)
2/
2/
May 7, 2025 at 11:40 PM
(An open letter to _The Dispatch._)
2/
2/
"Could SecDef Hegseth really have implicitly declassified all the stuff he shared?"
No. _NYT v CIA_ (2nd Circuit) governs. Money quote is here. When there is a clearly specified EO regulating the declassification of material, everyone, even the President, must obey.
This argument is meritless.
No. _NYT v CIA_ (2nd Circuit) governs. Money quote is here. When there is a clearly specified EO regulating the declassification of material, everyone, even the President, must obey.
This argument is meritless.
March 26, 2025 at 2:16 AM
"Could SecDef Hegseth really have implicitly declassified all the stuff he shared?"
No. _NYT v CIA_ (2nd Circuit) governs. Money quote is here. When there is a clearly specified EO regulating the declassification of material, everyone, even the President, must obey.
This argument is meritless.
No. _NYT v CIA_ (2nd Circuit) governs. Money quote is here. When there is a clearly specified EO regulating the declassification of material, everyone, even the President, must obey.
This argument is meritless.
I love Rust up until the sheer %#$! amateurish, fly-by-night software ecosystem smacks me in the face. "Rust supports WebAssembly! There's a book and everything! Great tutorial projects!"
Stupid me, I fell for it again.
This screencap is the tip of the error iceberg.
1/
Stupid me, I fell for it again.
This screencap is the tip of the error iceberg.
1/
March 17, 2025 at 8:17 AM
I love Rust up until the sheer %#$! amateurish, fly-by-night software ecosystem smacks me in the face. "Rust supports WebAssembly! There's a book and everything! Great tutorial projects!"
Stupid me, I fell for it again.
This screencap is the tip of the error iceberg.
1/
Stupid me, I fell for it again.
This screencap is the tip of the error iceberg.
1/
It's been a long time since I've seen SCOTUS reasoning this shoddy. Let's look at it slowly, because there's a lot to unpack.
1/
1/
March 5, 2025 at 4:25 PM
It's been a long time since I've seen SCOTUS reasoning this shoddy. Let's look at it slowly, because there's a lot to unpack.
1/
1/
I don't know about you, but I just pdflatex it, screenshot it, and embed the image. Works great for when the fam pings me asking about math homework. :)
(The full deriv, both as an example and if anyone's wondering:)
(The full deriv, both as an example and if anyone's wondering:)
February 28, 2025 at 8:48 PM
I don't know about you, but I just pdflatex it, screenshot it, and embed the image. Works great for when the fam pings me asking about math homework. :)
(The full deriv, both as an example and if anyone's wondering:)
(The full deriv, both as an example and if anyone's wondering:)
This is life-threatening. Immediately life-threatening.
January 28, 2025 at 10:33 PM
This is life-threatening. Immediately life-threatening.
Finally: I am not a lawyer, I am especially not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice. You might want to consider printing this on a business card and keeping it in your wallet, though.
January 27, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Finally: I am not a lawyer, I am especially not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice. You might want to consider printing this on a business card and keeping it in your wallet, though.
This Representative is suggesting an American citizen exercising her First Amendment rights to worship freely, speak freely, and petition her government, should be deported.
I lack words to express what a disgrace he is.
I lack words to express what a disgrace he is.
January 22, 2025 at 7:20 AM
This Representative is suggesting an American citizen exercising her First Amendment rights to worship freely, speak freely, and petition her government, should be deported.
I lack words to express what a disgrace he is.
I lack words to express what a disgrace he is.