If you post someone's art online without credit, there is a culture where at least one person will call you out on that. But when that art is available in print as part of a larger publication suddenly the origin of it just doesn't matter? It's still art! TELL ME WHO MADE IT.

And of course because this is a flashback these articles are citing the event and it's original depiction in the 1980s or 1990s but NOT the artist who drew this clearly in a modern comic. Sorry I'm just actually mad like you can't get away with this CITE YOUR SOURCES

Every lead I get on finding the source of this image is broken by someone not citing their sources. Obviously the video breaks it but then I tried to cross reference with another image from the video which looked like it was the same artists and found three separate articles all of which don't cite

Like I get it comics aren't viewed as a medium that warrants like. Scholarly sources and shit. But I think it is if you're going to be making a video on it! I came to you for information and you are telling it to me without citing your sources? This is like 5th grade research paper shit cmon now

"Did you know, in the comics..." *proceeds to say shit he read off a screenrant article that are wildly out of context or straight up never happened and don't exist*

Like to be clear! If you are someone who didn't know she used to dress like that, I don't care one bit. It's the people, often men, who sit in front of their LED lights and yap like they're god's gift to comic factoids that make me feel insane constantly