Huh! So in Finnish it’s ‘on Helsinki’ but ‘in Stockholm’?

Sometimes my devices misunderstand my (arguably not so heavy) Hungarian accent and Siri activates when I say "see..." but it never activates in the rare occasions when I do intend to use Siri. Which is for entertainment purposes, not timers. Siri is quite good at telling dad jokes.

I've been wondering about this myself too, also more broadly in the context of any intellectual property (eg artistic outputs). Afaik the law in general places more weight on completed & published outputs than to initiated but unfinished ones. Not sure if lay intuitions overlap though.

Read the full paper here:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... 4/4

We find evidence for a model where cues and commonly known norms trigger different readings of ownership & moral judgements via mental state attribution. Also, moral judgements don't correlate with ownership judgements 100% ("he *owns* it but it is wrong"). 3/4

We might have a hunch that a box of stuff next to a trash can is abandoned and therefore free game, but the same box next to a car is not. Similarly, in some US cities with abundant parking spots, even a piece of cardboard is widely understood as a reservation
(cf www.minethebook.com). 2/4

How do people know that what is owned in the absence of explicit information? Do people make inferences on ownership based on contextual cues, incl others' beliefs and knowledge of norms? 1/4

From Questions to Answers? From Questions to Understanding? + the subtitle, which is great imo

I was having trouble logging in yesterday but today it works ok. Maybe this is a +ve sign of troubleshooting

Hats off to Reddit mods who handled the case very well.
www.reddit.com/r/changemyvi...

this is a great paper, Zach! Really enjoyed reading it. Congrats!