reed eliot 🤌 🤌
@reedeliot.bsky.social
queer as fuck.
abolitionist.
decriminalize gender now!
everyone deserves everything they need to survive, even if they suck.
minneapolis & chicago based freak shooting photos, cooking, and joyfully rebelling against fascism every day
DM me for alt ;)
abolitionist.
decriminalize gender now!
everyone deserves everything they need to survive, even if they suck.
minneapolis & chicago based freak shooting photos, cooking, and joyfully rebelling against fascism every day
DM me for alt ;)
Reposted by reed eliot 🤌 🤌
This spring, MN Republicans sought to exempt athletics entirely from the Minnesota Human Rights Act - trying to end run around legally required trans inclusive policies.
Around the same time, IA Republicans removed gender identity from civil right protections *entirely*.
That's no coincidence.
Around the same time, IA Republicans removed gender identity from civil right protections *entirely*.
That's no coincidence.
December 1, 2025 at 6:19 PM
This spring, MN Republicans sought to exempt athletics entirely from the Minnesota Human Rights Act - trying to end run around legally required trans inclusive policies.
Around the same time, IA Republicans removed gender identity from civil right protections *entirely*.
That's no coincidence.
Around the same time, IA Republicans removed gender identity from civil right protections *entirely*.
That's no coincidence.
Reposted by reed eliot 🤌 🤌
tbh you probably COULD religiously persecute me. it’d take me long as hell to say anything. not bc i’m ok with being persecuted. but bc last time i thought i was being persecuted it turned out the bus driver just didnt see me running. i am often wrong. i guess not everyone thinks they’re often wrong
December 1, 2025 at 4:44 PM
tbh you probably COULD religiously persecute me. it’d take me long as hell to say anything. not bc i’m ok with being persecuted. but bc last time i thought i was being persecuted it turned out the bus driver just didnt see me running. i am often wrong. i guess not everyone thinks they’re often wrong
Reposted by reed eliot 🤌 🤌
because let me tell you i have gotten some F’s and i’ve lost some swim meets and you better believe id rather drink nail polish remover than make the details available to the news media and the legal discovery process
December 1, 2025 at 4:36 PM
because let me tell you i have gotten some F’s and i’ve lost some swim meets and you better believe id rather drink nail polish remover than make the details available to the news media and the legal discovery process
We can, legally, call her a killer.
She fucking killed a kid.
She fucking killed a kid.
November 27, 2025 at 2:58 AM
We can, legally, call her a killer.
She fucking killed a kid.
She fucking killed a kid.
Love this for you, my friend
November 27, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Love this for you, my friend
Jesus fucking Christ
November 27, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Jesus fucking Christ
Like she can't even be fucking bothered to show up???
November 26, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Like she can't even be fucking bothered to show up???
This needs to take down Cyndy but also everyone is senior leadership who was aware of this issue and not only defended Cyndy but attacked and harassed many other people out of the party on her behalf.
How on earth can this party maintain any semblance of credibility
How on earth can this party maintain any semblance of credibility
November 26, 2025 at 4:30 PM
This needs to take down Cyndy but also everyone is senior leadership who was aware of this issue and not only defended Cyndy but attacked and harassed many other people out of the party on her behalf.
How on earth can this party maintain any semblance of credibility
How on earth can this party maintain any semblance of credibility
It's weird. Her blood drug screening report came back negative for opiates. Who fucking knows what happened here really. It's just an outlandish thing to say she deserves "due process" when her own official story is that she drove under the influence, thought she hit something, and drove away.
November 26, 2025 at 4:29 PM
It's weird. Her blood drug screening report came back negative for opiates. Who fucking knows what happened here really. It's just an outlandish thing to say she deserves "due process" when her own official story is that she drove under the influence, thought she hit something, and drove away.
It's all in Taylor's blog post. Cyndy's defense against accusations of drunk driving were that she said she was not drunk, but that she had taken hydrocodone.
November 26, 2025 at 4:23 PM
It's all in Taylor's blog post. Cyndy's defense against accusations of drunk driving were that she said she was not drunk, but that she had taken hydrocodone.
She is acting like this young man's death is an inconvenience for her!
She fucking killed someone with her vehicle. She says she was on hydros while behind the wheel and that caused her to hit someone! Like that is her story! How is that, in and of itself, not disqualifying? What due process???
She fucking killed someone with her vehicle. She says she was on hydros while behind the wheel and that caused her to hit someone! Like that is her story! How is that, in and of itself, not disqualifying? What due process???
November 26, 2025 at 4:13 PM
She is acting like this young man's death is an inconvenience for her!
She fucking killed someone with her vehicle. She says she was on hydros while behind the wheel and that caused her to hit someone! Like that is her story! How is that, in and of itself, not disqualifying? What due process???
She fucking killed someone with her vehicle. She says she was on hydros while behind the wheel and that caused her to hit someone! Like that is her story! How is that, in and of itself, not disqualifying? What due process???