Robin (fka Jade) Nolan 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈🇮🇪🇪🇺
@redjade.bsky.social
Sapphic/bi, trans fem, artist. Also a programmer.🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
And btw - Safari on iPhone doesn’t let you use Bravesearch, you have to choose between these options.
November 26, 2025 at 11:29 AM
And btw - Safari on iPhone doesn’t let you use Bravesearch, you have to choose between these options.
We taking their shoes as well?
November 20, 2025 at 2:26 PM
We taking their shoes as well?
Guess they all left.
October 20, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Guess they all left.
Heather Humphries takes credit for essentially hobbling the gender recognition act for non binary people and under 16’s. I’m livid about this.
October 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Heather Humphries takes credit for essentially hobbling the gender recognition act for non binary people and under 16’s. I’m livid about this.
Hans… are we the baddies?
October 3, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Hans… are we the baddies?
Hans, I think we might be the baddies?
October 3, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Hans, I think we might be the baddies?
We finally found our answer for this problem.
September 12, 2025 at 10:28 PM
We finally found our answer for this problem.
He even smiles like a demon, Christ.
September 12, 2025 at 4:29 PM
He even smiles like a demon, Christ.
You would have to expand the number of countries to beyond just those two.
September 7, 2025 at 10:18 PM
You would have to expand the number of countries to beyond just those two.
If you want us in your party- Get. This. Man. Out.
September 1, 2025 at 9:37 PM
If you want us in your party- Get. This. Man. Out.
There is no benefit and no doubt.
September 1, 2025 at 9:34 PM
There is no benefit and no doubt.
Cis people will post shit like this and say “trans ally” in bio
August 24, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Cis people will post shit like this and say “trans ally” in bio
Take the comment above this one.
“I supplied some context you might have missed then disagreed on tactics”.
Firstly this assumes that a) she didn’t know the context b) there’s *any* context that we would accept as an excuse for staying in a book award with a man who calls trans women rapists 1/
“I supplied some context you might have missed then disagreed on tactics”.
Firstly this assumes that a) she didn’t know the context b) there’s *any* context that we would accept as an excuse for staying in a book award with a man who calls trans women rapists 1/
August 15, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Take the comment above this one.
“I supplied some context you might have missed then disagreed on tactics”.
Firstly this assumes that a) she didn’t know the context b) there’s *any* context that we would accept as an excuse for staying in a book award with a man who calls trans women rapists 1/
“I supplied some context you might have missed then disagreed on tactics”.
Firstly this assumes that a) she didn’t know the context b) there’s *any* context that we would accept as an excuse for staying in a book award with a man who calls trans women rapists 1/
This was happening the entire time. This is not a trump thing.
July 25, 2025 at 11:48 AM
This was happening the entire time. This is not a trump thing.
This was the vote from 2024; you’re taking smoke about the vote from last week.
Google is free!
Legit though, this is just disingenuous to act like it was this other vote we were mad about. This is Fetterman levels of crashing tf out.
Google is free!
Legit though, this is just disingenuous to act like it was this other vote we were mad about. This is Fetterman levels of crashing tf out.
July 22, 2025 at 9:06 AM
This was the vote from 2024; you’re taking smoke about the vote from last week.
Google is free!
Legit though, this is just disingenuous to act like it was this other vote we were mad about. This is Fetterman levels of crashing tf out.
Google is free!
Legit though, this is just disingenuous to act like it was this other vote we were mad about. This is Fetterman levels of crashing tf out.
She didn’t vote no because of that though, she actually didn’t mention mtg being an anti semite at all.
She nailed her colours to the mast by saying the money is *explicitly* about defending Israel, not opposing antisemitism.
We don’t have to speculate as to why she voted no, she told us.
She nailed her colours to the mast by saying the money is *explicitly* about defending Israel, not opposing antisemitism.
We don’t have to speculate as to why she voted no, she told us.
July 22, 2025 at 9:04 AM
She didn’t vote no because of that though, she actually didn’t mention mtg being an anti semite at all.
She nailed her colours to the mast by saying the money is *explicitly* about defending Israel, not opposing antisemitism.
We don’t have to speculate as to why she voted no, she told us.
She nailed her colours to the mast by saying the money is *explicitly* about defending Israel, not opposing antisemitism.
We don’t have to speculate as to why she voted no, she told us.
That wasn’t what she said in her mea cupla about why she voted for it, she said it’s explicitly about keeping money open for “defending” Israel.
Now if she had said that she was voting no BECAUSE of the billions of dollars in offensive aid in the amendment, she would not be in this shitshow.
Now if she had said that she was voting no BECAUSE of the billions of dollars in offensive aid in the amendment, she would not be in this shitshow.
July 22, 2025 at 8:58 AM
That wasn’t what she said in her mea cupla about why she voted for it, she said it’s explicitly about keeping money open for “defending” Israel.
Now if she had said that she was voting no BECAUSE of the billions of dollars in offensive aid in the amendment, she would not be in this shitshow.
Now if she had said that she was voting no BECAUSE of the billions of dollars in offensive aid in the amendment, she would not be in this shitshow.
Can’t believe you’re doubling down on this but let’s clarify - we all knew the amendment was going to fail anyway so it doesn’t matter which way you voted on it.
But the issue we have is not just the way you voted, it’s the way you tried to defend the vote afterwards.
But the issue we have is not just the way you voted, it’s the way you tried to defend the vote afterwards.
July 22, 2025 at 8:24 AM
Can’t believe you’re doubling down on this but let’s clarify - we all knew the amendment was going to fail anyway so it doesn’t matter which way you voted on it.
But the issue we have is not just the way you voted, it’s the way you tried to defend the vote afterwards.
But the issue we have is not just the way you voted, it’s the way you tried to defend the vote afterwards.
The phrase from their platform is “freedom for all incarcerated people” - and then it follows up in their manifesto with this list of specific demands.
When they say “freedom” they mean freedom in the sense that people in prison have rights, not that we’re literally going to free them from jail.
When they say “freedom” they mean freedom in the sense that people in prison have rights, not that we’re literally going to free them from jail.
July 21, 2025 at 1:26 PM
The phrase from their platform is “freedom for all incarcerated people” - and then it follows up in their manifesto with this list of specific demands.
When they say “freedom” they mean freedom in the sense that people in prison have rights, not that we’re literally going to free them from jail.
When they say “freedom” they mean freedom in the sense that people in prison have rights, not that we’re literally going to free them from jail.
Dublin is making me proud to be Irish today <3
July 19, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Dublin is making me proud to be Irish today <3