Rachel Ungar
banner
raungar.bsky.social
Rachel Ungar
@raungar.bsky.social
Postdoc at @StanfordBioethx
Genetics PhD @StanfordMed, BS @UArkansas
elsi / rna-seq / rare disease / multi-omics / chronic illness / x-chromosome
Reposted by Rachel Ungar
This survey was put together by several fellow trainees and friends who are dedicated to the ethical conduct of human genetics research. Tagging some below! @christacaggiano.bsky.social @roshnipatel.bsky.social @raungar.bsky.social @dianexue.bsky.social @jpflores.rbind.io
June 2, 2025 at 5:37 PM
This was the first project I started when I joined the Montgomery lab over five years ago, and I really grew up scientifically with this project. I am extra lucky that Stephen developed this project specifically with my personal scientific interests in mind.
January 24, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Many thanks to my second author Taibo Li, who was wonderful to work with and even helped finish this project even after returning to the MD side of his MD-PhD. I am also grateful for the mentorship of @sbmontgom.bsky.social throughout this project.
January 24, 2025 at 4:04 PM
We saw that many of these sex-biased variants were enriched for being in motifs that recruited transcription factors with known sex biases.
January 24, 2025 at 4:02 PM
We show these sex-biased variants are enriched for being in pharmacogenes with adverse-drug reactions, including those with known sex-biased adverse drug reactions. To my knowledge no study had previously looked at pharmacogenetic implications of sex-biased rare variants.
January 24, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Sex differences are often overstated, so I want to be clear. Males and females are more similar than they are different. We identified just 0.04% of total rare variants to have a difference by sex.
January 24, 2025 at 4:01 PM
We (Taibo Li) then trained a Bayesian model to predict variants with different functional effects by sex. We identified 753 variants with a predicted sex bias across 464 genes.
January 24, 2025 at 4:00 PM
We then wanted to understand the functional impact of rare variants, both with and without sex-stratification. In males, but not females, we found that rare variants had a stronger functional impact when on the X-chromosome as compared to the autosomes.
January 24, 2025 at 4:00 PM
This project actually started as one trying to understand the impact of sex-stratification on expression outlier discovery. We saw a small change (0.1-0.2% genes changed outlier status), but one that indicated a reduction in false outliers.
January 24, 2025 at 4:00 PM